The naphthaleman family, a set of uniquely designed visual molecular structures comprising multisubstituted naphthalenes, was synthesized utilizing regiocontrolled benzannulation as a key step. The naphthaleman family possesses a common naphthalene body with a head comprising the 3,4-methylenedioxy group, symmetrical or unsymmetrical right and left arms, and two alkynyl legs. The synthesis involves six C-C bond-forming reaction sequences. (i) syn-Stereoselective gem-dichlorocyclopropanation of methyl angelate (86%). (ii) Acylation with ArMgBr (three examples, 60-91% yield). (iii) Stereocontrolled introduction of the 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl group (three examples, 67-92% yield). (iv) Crucial regiocontrolled benzannulation to construct a common body segment (71-73% yield). (v) Two Suzuki-Miyaura cross-couplings to install the right or left arms (first-stage route: four examples, 77-93% and second-stage route: four examples, 42-90% yield). (vi) Double alkynylation to insert two legs (first-stage route: four examples, 61-77% yield and second-stage route: sole example, 83% yield). The four core members were produced through both first-stage and second-stage routes, with the second-stage approach demonstrating superiority over the first-stage approach. One of the members was alternatively synthesized by switching the installation order of the right and left arms, and identical twin members were produced by high-performance liquid chromatography chiral separation. The most stable conformations of two naphthaleman family members were calculated by Spartan software.
The naphthaleman family, a set of uniquely designed visual molecular structures comprising multisubstituted naphthalenes, was synthesized utilizing regiocontrolled benzannulation as a key step. The naphthaleman family possesses a common naphthalene body with a head comprising the 3,4-methylenedioxy group, symmetrical or unsymmetrical right and left arms, and two alkynyl legs. The synthesis involves six C-C bond-forming reaction sequences. (i) syn-Stereoselective gem-dichlorocyclopropanation of methyl angelate (86%). (ii) Acylation with ArMgBr (three examples, 60-91% yield). (iii) Stereocontrolled introduction of the 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl group (three examples, 67-92% yield). (iv) Crucial regiocontrolled benzannulation to construct a common body segment (71-73% yield). (v) Two Suzuki-Miyaura cross-couplings to install the right or left arms (first-stage route: four examples, 77-93% and second-stage route: four examples, 42-90% yield). (vi) Double alkynylation to insert two legs (first-stage route: four examples, 61-77% yield and second-stage route: sole example, 83% yield). The four core members were produced through both first-stage and second-stage routes, with the second-stage approach demonstrating superiority over the first-stage approach. One of the members was alternatively synthesized by switching the installation order of the right and left arms, and identical twin members were produced by high-performance liquid chromatography chiral separation. The most stable conformations of two naphthaleman family members were calculated by Spartan software.
Aromatic
compounds containing unique visual molecular structures
have attracted the attention of many chemists over the past few decades,
from not only a scientific but also an educational standpoint. The
pioneering synthesis of “nanokid” and his family, introduced
by Chanteau and Tour,[1] caused quite sensation
for both chemists and students due to their fascinating structures
(Figure ). The subsequent
syntheses of nanocar,[2] molecular motor,[3] and penguinone[4] as
representative bewitched molecules with distinct aromatic structures
have also attracted considerable attention.
Figure 1
Representative visual
compounds: nanokid, nanocar, molecular motor,
and penguinone.
Representative visual
compounds: nanokid, nanocar, molecular motor,
and penguinone.Inspired by these unique molecular
structures and in close connection
with our longstanding studies of the transformation of gem-dihalocyclopropanes,[5] we present here
the synthesis of a uniquely designed “naphthaleman family”
with several charming members that are composed of fully substituted
naphthalene structures (Figure ). They resemble human forms and familiar objects and may
evoke images of “a side-throwing pitcher”, “a
football keeper”, “a tennis player”, “a
flying bird”, or “a swimming frog”. The family
comprises four naphthaleman core members 1a–1d, a clone of 1c by an alternative synthesis, and identical
twins S-1d and R-1d by optical resolution.
Figure 2
Naphthaleman family members.
Naphthaleman family members.
Results and Discussion
Retrosyntheses
Regiocontrolled benzannulation
strategies
provide distinctive constructions for highly substituted and elaborated
α-arylnaphthalenes, which have useful applications as reagents,
catalysts, biologically active natural products, pharmaceuticals,
and functionalized materials due to their core structural scaffolds.[6] Our continuing investigations on nonregioselective,[5a,5b] regiocontrolled,[5c] chirality exchange,[5d] and large-scale[5e] benzannulations, and the relevant cyclopropane transformations[6] or derivatizations,[7] led us to envision the synthesis of a “naphthaleman family” 1 possessing a common naphthalene body with a head comprising
the 3,4-methylenedioxy group, symmetrical or unsymmetrical right and
left arms, and two alkynyl legs. Retrosynthetic pathways for the synthesis
of 1 are classified as either the first-stage approach
or the second-stage approach (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Two Retrosynthetic Approaches for Naphthaleman Family 1
Common body segment 6 was conveniently prepared following
the reported practical procedures.[5e] Three
contiguous functional groups in 6 were effectively utilized
for the construction of 1. Two contiguous benzylic positions
were transformed to two legs by dibromination and successive ethynylation.
On the other hand, the pendant 1-chloro group was coupled with four
arms by Suzuki–Miyaura cross-couplings to produce naphthaleman
family 1 with uniquely substituted head, hands, and legs.The first stage approach consists of six C–C bond-forming
reactions to construct the naphthaleman family 1. (i) Syn-stereoselective gem-dichlorocyclopropanation
of methyl angelate leading to the formation of acid chloride 3. (ii) Acylation of 3 with PhMgBr leading to
the formation of phenyl ketone 4. (iii) Stereocontrolled
introduction of 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl groups to 4 leading
to the formation of [S*-(1S*,3S*)]-phenyl(3,4-methylenedioxypheny)-2,2-dichlorocyclopropylmethanol 5. (iv) Crucial regiocontrolled benzannulation of 5 affording 1-phenyl-4-chloronaphthelene 6 as a common
body segment. (v) Suzuki–Miyaura cross-couplings using acceptor 6 leading to the formation of 1-aryl-4-phenyl-2,3-dimethylnaphthalenes 7a–7d. (vi) Double alkynylation of dibromide 8a–8d derived from 7a–7d producing
the target naphthaleman family 1a–1d.In
contrast, the second-stage approach involves another sequence
of six C–C bond-forming reactions. The first four steps (i)–(iv)
are the same as those for the linear approach. The double alkynylation
step of 6 precedes Suzuki–Miyaura cross-couplings
using common scaffold 10. The convergent approach is
apparently superior to the linear approach from the standpoint of
total efficiency to produce family members 1a–1d.
Construction of the Common Body Segment
Scheme shows the construction of
the common “body” segment 6 for not only
the linear approach but also the convergent approach. Methyl angelate
was converted to acid chloride 3 by syn-stereoselective gem-dichlorocyclopropanation and
two conventional transformations (hydrolysis and acid chloride formation)
according to the reported method.[5c] Phenylation
of 3 with PhMgBr at 0–5 °C afforded 2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl
phenyl ketone 4 in 81% yield. Subsequent Cram rule-stereocontrolled
3,4-methylendioxyphenyl group addition to the predominant s-trans conformer of 4 proceeded smoothly to
afford [S*-(1S*,3S*)]-stereodefined (3,4-methylendioxy)(phenyl)(2,2-dichlorocyclopropyl)methanol 5 in 92% yield.[5b] The key regiocontrolled
benzannulation using 5 successfully produced the common
body segment 6 in 72% yield with excellent regioselectivity.[5c] The regiocontrolled pathway can be rationalized
by the reported chelation mechanism fixing the conformation during
the cyclopropane cleavage.
Scheme 2
Construction of Common Body Segment 6
First-Stage Approach for
the Synthesis of the Naphthaleman Family
With the body segment 6 in hand, we next examined
Suzuki–Miyaura cross-couplings of α-chloronaphthalenes 6 to install four “right arm” parts (Scheme ). Despite the sterically
congested and less reactive α-chloro position in 6, coupling with ArB(OH)2 (5.0 equiv) proceeded well to
afford the desired full-body precursors 7a–7d in
77–93% yield using (1,3-diisopropylimidazol-2-ylidene)(3-chloropyridyl)palladium(II)dichloride
(PEPPSI-IPr)[8] (0.20 equiv)-K2CO3 (5.0 equiv) catalysis under somewhat harsh conditions
(i.e., molar ratio, temperature, and time; optimization of PEPPSI-IPr-K2CO3 catalysis using 6: see the Supporting Information). The two leg parts were
introduced by the following sequences: 7a–7d were
dibrominated using NBS/cat, AIBN to afford 8a–8d in 75–90% yield, and subsequent double alkynylation with
the lithium salt of 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yn provided the four members
of the naphthaleman family 1a–1d in 75–86%
yield.
Scheme 3
Syntheses of Naphthaleman Family 1 by the First-Stage
Approach
Second-Stage Approach for
the Synthesis of the Naphthaleman
Family
After developing the first-stage approach, we turned
our attention to a more straightforward approach. Treatment of body
segment 6 with NBS/cat. AIBN under identical conditions
afforded dibrominated product 9 in 93% yield (Scheme ). A similar double
ethynylation by the lithium salt of 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yn provided
the common α-chloronaphthalene scaffold 10 in 89%
yield. Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of 10 with
ArB(OH)2 using a similar PEPPSI-IPr catalysis, however,
led to the formation of complex mixtures under the conditions described
in Scheme because
the two alkynyl groups in the legs did not tolerate the identical
conditions to give complex mixtures.
Scheme 4
Syntheses of Naphthaleman
Family 1 by the Second-Stage
Approach
Fortuitously, the use of ArB(OH)2 (1.5 equiv) using
a more reactive Pd(OAc)2 (0.04 equiv)–SPhos (0.06
equiv)–K3PO4 (2.0 equiv) catalysis[9] instead of PEPPSI-IPr catalysis solved the problem
with the toleration of the alkynyl moiety to produce the four family
members of 1a–1d in 42–90%. Notably, these
cross-couplings were implemented under more mild conditions (i.e.,
better molar ratio, lower catalyst loading, lower temperature, and
shorter time).
Alternative Synthesis of Naphthaleman Family 1c by the Switching Route
To expand the scope of
this project,
we envisaged an alternative synthetic route for synthesizing the naphthaleman
family 1c′ (= 1c) (Scheme ). The 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl
“left arm” group was initially installed by acylation
with acid chloride 3 to afford ketone 11 in 60% yield. Next, the 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl “right arm”
group was added to 11 to afford alcohol 12 in 86% yield with high stereoselectivity. Alcohol 12 smoothly underwent regiocontrolled benzannulation to produce alternative
body segment 13 in 73% yield. Notably, the reaction sequences
follow the reported total synthesis of dehydrodesoxypodophyllotoxin,
an unsymmetrically substituted lignan lactone.[5c]
Scheme 5
Synthesis of the Naphthaleman Family 1c′ (= 1c)
Sha’s group pointed out that the inherent reactivity order
during the Friedel–Crafts-type reaction was 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl
group >3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl group due to the favorable planar
π-electron overlap of the 3,4-dimethoxy group.[8] Nonetheless, the present regiocontrolled benzannulation
proceeded smoothly toward the less-reactive 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl
group, probably because the chelation-controlled mechanism functioned
effectively (see Scheme ). Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling of 13 using
PEPPSI-IPr-K2CO3 catalysis afforded clone precursor 7c (see Scheme ). Subsequent dibromination and dialkynylation sequences using 7c successfully produced the target naphthaleman family 1c′ (= 1c). Eventually, the introduction
order of the right and left arms was switched conversely.
Synthesis of
“Identical Twins” by Optical Resolution
Family
member 1d is composed of the body naphthalene
connected with the right arm or left arm between the α- and
α′- positions, in which axial chirality should emerge
(Scheme ). Actually,
chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis revealed
that 1d was formed as a racemate (two enantiomeric mixtures)
(vide infra).
Scheme 6
Synthesis of “Identical Twins” of Naphthaleman 1d via an Alternative Route
With this result in hand, we implemented an alternative shorter
synthesis of 1d than the conventional route, as shown
in Scheme ; parent
ester 2 was employed instead of acid chloride 3 for the acylation step (Scheme ). Ketone 14 was obtained in good yield
(67%) by the acylation of 2 with (1-naphthyl)MgBr, in
which the use of a stereocongested (1-naphthyl)MgBr nucleophile completely
prevented further undesirable addition. The addition of 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl
lithium to 14 also afforded alcohol 15 in
better 76% yield, which was
subjected to regiocontrolled benzannulation to produce novel body
segment 16 in 71% yield. Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling
of 16 with PhB(OH)2, catalyzed by Pd(OAc)2–SPhos–K2PO4, successfully
furnished 7d in 70% yield. As described in the linear
approach procedure of the First-Stage Approach
for the Synthesis of the Naphthaleman Family, a formal synthesis
of the desired family member 1d was completed. In a series
of α-naphthyl(naphthalene) compounds (A), axial
chirality induced geminal couplings of 1H NMR between Ha and Hb due to the inequivalency.
Chiral HPLC analysis of 1d resulted in the separation
of the identical twins (a couple of enantiomers) and with high resolution
(a chart of the clear separation is addressed in the Supporting Information).The most stable conformations
of naphthaleman family members 1a and 1d were calculated by Spartan software
(Wavefunction, Inc. ver. ’18 1.1.0) (Figure ). In both compounds, the two legs were located
not in parallel but rather spreading at ca. 130° due to the steric
repulsion: not standup style but running style. In contrast, the two
arms were located perpendicular and parallel to the naphthalene body,
the result of which is in good accordance with the reported X-ray
structure of the relevant and fundamental 4-chloro-2-methyl-1-phenylnaphthalene.[5b]
Figure 3
Spartan calculation drawing of naphthaleman 1a and
“identical twin” of naphthaleman 1d.
Spartan calculation drawing of naphthaleman 1a and
“identical twin” of naphthaleman 1d.
Conclusions
We developed the synthesis
of the naphthaleman family, a set of
uniquely designed visual molecular structures comprising multisubstituted
naphthalenes, utilizing regiocontrolled benzannulation as the key
step. The naphthaleman family possesses a common naphthalene body
having a head comprising a 3,4-methylenedioxy group, symmetrical or
unsymmetrical right and left arms, and two alkynyl legs. The synthetic
approaches are classified as either a first-stage approach, catalyzed
by PEPPSI-IPr–K2CO3 or a superior second-stage
approach, catalyzed by Pd(OAc)2–SPhos–K2PO4. The four core members were produced through
both routes, with the convergent approach demonstrating superiority
over the linear approach (i.e., milder conditions, better molar ratio,
and lower catalyst loading). One of the members was alternatively
synthesized by switching the installation order of the right and left
arms, and identical twin members were produced by chiral HPLC separation.
The most stable conformations of two naphthaleman family members were
calculated by Spartan software; the two legs were spreading and the
two arms were located perpendicular and parallel to the naphthalene
body.We are now planning an asymmetric synthesis of twin members
by
utilizing chirality-transfer benzannulation (a distinctive chiral
version) to provide the audience, particularly students, interested
in this organic chemistry. The result will be presented in the future.
BuLi (1.58
M in hexane, 2.24 mL, 3.53 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of
3,4-methylenedioxy-1-bromobenzene (712 mg, 2.36 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran
(THF) (8 mL) at −78 °C under an Ar atmosphere, and the
mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 0.5 h. Ketone 4 (574 mg, 2.36 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added to the mixture
at the same temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The
mixture was poured into ice and maintained. NH4Cl aqueous
solution was extracted twice with Et2O. The combined organic
phase was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude oil was purified by
SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 100:1 to 50:1)
to give the desired product 5 (788 mg, 91%, small amounts
of inseparable impurities were contained).Colorless oil; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ
1.19 (s, 3H), 1.53 (q, J = 6.9
Hz, 1H), 1.76 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 2.78 (brs, 1H,
−OH), 5.96 (s, 2H), 6.57 (dd, J = 1.8 Hz, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.2
Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), and 7.34–7.52
(m, 5H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.1,
27.2, 36.3, 38.3, 73.8, 83.8, 101.0, 107.0, 108.9, 122.0, 127.9, 128.2,
128.8, 140.8, 144.6, 146.5, and 147.1; IR (neat) νmax: 3570, 2928, 1489, 1444, 1321, 1271, 1240, 1198, 1036, and 934 cm–1.
SnCl4 (261 mg, 1.0 mmol) was
added to a stirred solution of alcohol 5 (365 mg, 1.0
mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL, ca. 0.05 M) at 80 °C under
an Ar atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature
for 1 h. The mixture was filtered through the Celite with a glass
filter, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure.
Sat. NaHCO3 aqueous solution was added to the residue which
was extracted by CHCl3, and the separated organic phase
was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude solid was purified by recrystallization
(CHCl3) to give the desired product 6 (225
mg, 72%).Colorless crystals; mp 160–161 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.11 (s, 3H), 2.56
(s, 3H), 5.98 (s, 2H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 7.15–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.44
(m, 1H), 7.46–7.50 (m, 2H), and 7.66 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.0, 18.8, 101.1, 101.3,
103.2, 126.5, 127.1, 128.5 (2C), 129.3, 130.0, 130.1 (2C), 131.5,
132.1, 136.9, 140.3, 147.1, and 147.7; IR (neat) νmax: 2907, 1611, 1501, 1464, 1397, 1310, 1242, 1200, 1041, and 945 cm–1.
PEPPSI-IPr (68 mg, 0.1 mmol) and K2CO3 (346 mg, 2.5 mmol) were successively added
to a stirred
solution of PhB(OH)2 (305 mg, 2,5 mmol) in i-PrOH (1.3 mL) at 80 °C under an Ar atmosphere, and the mixture
was stirred at the same temperature for 10 min. A solution of 1-chloronaphthalene 6 (155 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (5 mL) was added to the
mixture, which was stirred at the same temperature for 10 h. The mixture
was quenched with water, which was filtered through the Celite with
a glass filter, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure.
The residue was extracted twice with CHCl3. The combined
organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude product was
purified by SiO2-column chromatography (hexane: AcOEt =
1:0 to 50:1) to give the desired product 7a (146 mg,
83%).Colorless crystals; mp 277–278 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.13 (s, 6H), 5.88
(s, 2H), 6.64 (s, 2H), 7.28–7.29 (m, 4H), and 7.39–7.55
(m, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.3
(2C), 100.8, 103.0 (2C), 127.0 (2C), 128.4 (2C), 128.6 (4C), 130.3
(4C), 131.5 (2C), 137.5 (2C), 141.2 (2C), and 146.5 (2C); IR (neat)
νmax: 3023, 2903, 1497, 1464, 1238, 1038, 1017, 945,
862, and 752 cm–1.
NBS (182 mg, 1.0 mmol) and AIBN (4 mg,
0.02 mmol) were successively added to a stirred solution of 2,3-dimethylnaphthalene 7a (157 mg, 0.45 mmol) in benzene (7.2 mL) at 20–25
°C under an Ar atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred at 80
°C for 1 h. The mixture was quenched with 1 M aqueous HCl, which
was extracted twice with CHCl3. The combined organic phase
was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude product was purified by SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 1:0 to 50:1) to give
the desired product 8a (172 mg, 75%).Colorless crystals; mp 261–262 °C; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.67 (s, 4H), 5.93
(s, 2H), 6.63 (s, 2H), 7.38–7.46 (m, 4H), and 7.47–7.61
(m, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.5,
101.3, 103.7, 128.0, 128.6, 129.9, 130.1, 130.4, 138.2, 140.7, and
148.1; IR (neat) νmax: 3058, 2915, 1497, 1472, 1250,
1200, 1071, 1038, 947, and 853 cm–1.
BuLi (1.3
mL 2.0 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yne
(164 mg, 2.0 mmol) in THF (0.2 mL) at −78 °C under an
Ar atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature
for 0.5 h. A solution of 8a (51 mg, 0.1 mmol) in hexamethylphosphoramide
(HMPA) (0.4 mL) and THF (0.3 mL) was added to the mixture, which was
stirred at the same temperature for 1 h. The mixture was quenched
with aqueous sat. NH4Cl solution was extracted twice with
CHCl3. The combined organic phase was washed with water
and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated.
The obtained crude product was purified by SiO2-column
chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 50:1 → 10:1) to give the desired
product 1a (42 mg, 81%).
Following the procedure for the preparation
of 1a, the reaction using BuLi (1.3 mL, 2.0 mmol) and 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yne (164 mg, 2.0 mmol), 8b (54 mg, 0.1 mmol), gave the desired product 1b (41 mg, 75%).
Following the procedure for the preparation
of 1a, the reaction of BuLi
(0.6 mL 1.0 mmol), 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yne (82 mg, 1.0 mmol), 1c (51 mg, 0.1 mmol), gave the desired product 1c (52 mg, 86%).
Following the procedure for the preparation
of the reaction of 1a, the reaction of BuLi (0.6 mL, 1.0 mmol) and 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yne (82 mg, 1.0
mmol), 8d (54 mg, 0.1 mmol), gave the desired product 1d (44 mg, 77%).
BuLi (42 mL, 66 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 3,3-dimethylbut-1-yne
(5.99 g, 73 mmol) in THF (15 mL) at −78 °C under an Ar
atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for
0.5 h. A solution of bis(bromomethyl)naphthalene 9 (3.43
g, 7.3 mmol) in HMPA (7.3 mL) and THF (22 mL) was added to the mixture,
which was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h, followed by stirring
at 20–25 °C for 1 h. The mixture was quenched with water,
which was extracted twice with hexane. The combined organic phase
was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude solid was purified by SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 50:1) to give the desired
product 10 (2.16 g, 67%).Paled yellow crystals;
mp 159–161 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.14 (s, 9H), 1.16
(s, 9H), 3.41 (s, 2H), 4.03 (s, 2H), 6.00 (s, 2H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 7.32–7.33
(m, 2H), 7.44–7.50 (m, 3H), and 7.70 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz; CDCl3): δ 21.0, 21.5, 27.3, 27.4,
31.1 (3C), 31.2 (3C), 75.0, 76.6, 89.3, 89.7, 101.3, 101.5, 103.5,
127.2, 127.5, 128.3 (2C), 130.1, 130.3 (2C), 130.4, 131.6, 132.5,
137.5, 139.1, 147.7, and 148.1; IR (neat) νmax: 2966,
2899, 2866, 1483, 1456, 1238, and 758 cm–1.HRMS (DART) m/z: calcd for C31H32ClO2 [M + H]+, 471.2091; found, 471.2065.
To a stirred
solution of (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)magnesium bromide prepared from
Mg (48 mg, 2.0 mmol) and 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-bromobenzene (494 mg,
2.0 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL), acid chloride 3 (201 mg, 1.0
mmol) in THF (1.0 mL) was added at 0–5 °C. The mixture
was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h. Sat. NH4Cl
aqueous solution was added to the mixture, which was extracted twice
with ether. The combined organic phase was washed with water and brine,
dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained
crude oil was purified by SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt
= 10:1) to give the desired product 11 (200 mg, 91%).Colorless oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ
1.41 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 1.68
(q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.68 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H),
3.95 (s, 6H), and 7.28 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3): δ 11.6, 23.6, 35.2, 39.5, 56.2, 61.0, 68.6, 105.2,
107.1, 142.9, 153.0, and 193.8; IR (neat) 3570, 2928, 1489, 1444,
1321, 1271, 1240, 1198, 1036, and 934 cm–1.
BuLi (1.58 M in hexane, 1.40 mL, 2.21 mmol) was added
to a stirred solution of 3,4-methylenedioxy-1-bromobenzene (578 mg,
2.34 mmol) in THF (5 mL) at −78 °C under an Ar atmosphere,
and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 0.5 h. Ketone 11 (520 mg, 1.56 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added to the mixture
at the same temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The
mixture was poured into ice and maintained. NH4Cl aqueous
solution was extracted twice with Et2O. The combined organic
phase was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude oil was purified by
SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 100:1 to 50:1)
to give the desired product 12 (610 mg, 86%).Colorless amorphous solid; 1H NMR (400
MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.19 (s, 3H), 1.56 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 2.73 (brs,
1H, -OH), 3.86 (s, 6H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 5.96
(d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (d, J =
1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 2.0 Hz, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (s,
2H), and 6.81 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3): δ 11.1, 27.1, 36.4, 38.5, 56.3,
60.9, 74.3, 83.9, 101.1, 106.2, 107.1, 108.8, 122.0, 139.9, 140.5,
146.6, 147.2, and 152.7; IR (KBr) νmax: 3569, 1591,
1487, and 1238 cm–1.
Following the procedure for the preparation of α-chloronaphthalene 6, the reaction of alcohol 12 (610 mg, 1.34 mmol)
and SnCl4 (1 M solution: 1.34 mL, 1.34 mmol) gave the desired
product 13 (368 mg, 73%).Colorless crystals; mp
181–186 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3): δ 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.25
(s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 6H), 5.91 (s, 2H), 6.51 (s, 2H), 6.65
(s, 1H), and 6.75 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ
14.4, 16.1, 56.1 (2C), 60.8, 101.2, 103.2, 104.7, 106.3 (2C), 121.9,
125.7, 128.7, 130.8, 132.3, 136.2, 136.4, 138.1, 147.2, 149.5, and
153.1 (2C); IR (KBr) νmax: 1464, 1252, and 1107 cm–1.
Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of 13 Affording 7c
Following the procedure
for the preparation of
α-chloronaphthalene 7b, the reaction of alcohol 13 (80 mg, 0.20 mmol) gave the desired product 7c (65 mg, 73%).
BuLi (1.58
M in hexane, 47 mL, 75 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 1-bromonaphthalene
(15.5 g, 75 mmol) in THF (50 mL) at −78 °C under an Ar
atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for
0.5 h. Ester 4 (9.85 g, 50 mmol) in THF (50 mL) was added
to the mixture at the same temperature, and the mixture was stirred
for 2 h. The mixture was poured into ice and maintained. NH4Cl aqueous solution was extracted twice with Et2O. The
combined organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated. The obtained crude oil
was purified by SiO2-column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt
= 50:1) to give the desired product 14 (11.1 g, 76%).Colorless oil; 1H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3): δ
1.46 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.72–1.76
(m, 4H), 7.53–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.65 (m, 2H), 7.89–7.91
(m, 1H), 8.05–8.07 (m, 1H), 8.10–8.11 (m, 1H), and 8.92–8.94
(m, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.9, 24.3,
36.4, 41.3, 69.1, 124.5, 125.8, 126.5, 128.5, 128.6, 131.2, 131.3,
131.5, 134.1, 134.2, and 197.9; IR (neat) νmax: 2899,
1610, 1465, 1240, 1041, 948, 908, 798, 777, and 734 cm–1; HRMS (DART) m/z: calcd for C16H15Cl2O1 [M + H]+, 293.0500; found, 293.0522.
Authors: Yasuhiro Shirai; Jean-François Morin; Takashi Sasaki; Jason M Guerrero; James M Tour Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2006-08-23 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Joanna Nasielski; Nilofaur Hadei; George Achonduh; Eric Assen B Kantchev; Christopher J O'Brien; Alan Lough; Michael G Organ Journal: Chemistry Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 5.236