Literature DB >> 3490131

Reactivity and tumorigenicity of bay-region diol epoxides derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

D M Jerina, J M Sayer, S K Agarwal, H Yagi, W Levin, A W Wood, A H Conney, D Pruess-Schwartz, W M Baird, M A Pigott.   

Abstract

During the past decade substantial progress has been made in elucidating factors that determine the tumorigenic activity of bay-region diol epoxides, major ultimate carcinogenic metabolites derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Neither high nor low chemical reactivity of the diol epoxides (as measured by rates of uncatalyzed solvolysis) is required for high tumorigenic response. In contrast, aspects of molecular structure such as conformation and absolute configuration strongly influence tumorigenic activity. The role of conformation is illustrated by the observation that those diol epoxides whose hydroxyl groups are pseudoaxial are weak or inactive as tumorigens. Absolute configuration is an important determinant of biological activity of bay-region diol epoxides: in all cases studied to date, the predominantly formed (R,S)-diol-(S,R)-epoxides are generally the most tumorigenic of the four metabolically possible configurational isomers. In the course of investigating the effects of structural factors on tumorigenic activity, we identified the (4R,3S)-diol-(2S,1R)-epoxide of benzo(c)phenanthrene as the most potent tumorigen (in initiation-promotion experiments on mouse skin) of the diol epoxides studied to date. Studies of all four configurationally isomeric diol epoxides derived from benzo(c)phenanthrene led to the striking observation that these diol epoxides exhibit an exceptionally high efficiency of covalent binding, relative to hydrolysis, when allowed to react with calf thymus DNA in aqueous solution. Thus, these diol epoxides should provide an excellent tool for the detailed study of such binding. When the four isomeric benzo(c)phenanthrene diol epoxides are compared, there appears to be no simple correlation between tumorigenic response and either the extent of binding to DNA or the major types of deoxyribonucleoside adducts formed. Deoxyribonucleoside adducts of benzo(c)phenanthrene diol epoxide have also been identified from the DNA of cultured rodent embryo cells after treatment of the cells with tritium-labeled benzo(c)phenanthrene. The distribution of adducts is consistent with predominant metabolic formation of the (4R,3S)-diol-(2S,1R)-epoxide; deoxyadenosine is the major site in the cellular DNA attacked by this epoxide, just as it is in DNA in solution. Further experiments are in progress which we hope will identify more subtle aspects of the DNA binding of benzo(c)phenanthrene diol epoxides that may be uniquely correlated with their tumorigenic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3490131     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5134-4_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of 5-methylchrysene and its 1,2-dihydrodiol in V79MZ cells modified to express human CYP1A1 or CYP1B1, in the presence or absence of human GSTP1 coexpression.

Authors:  Sarfaraz Ahmad; Sandra L Kabler; Lisa Rudd; Shantu Amin; Johannes Doehmer; Charles S Morrow; Alan J Townsend
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Stereoselective metabolism of the environmental mammary carcinogen 6-nitrochrysene to trans-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydro-6-nitrochrysene by aroclor 1254-treated rat liver microsomes and their comparative mutation profiles in a laci mammary epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Yuan-Wan Sun; Joseph B Guttenplan; Michael Khmelnitsky; Jacek Krzeminski; Telih Boyiri; Shantu Amin; Karam El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Mechanisms underlying the varied mammary carcinogenicity of the environmental pollutant 6-nitrochrysene and its metabolites (-)-[R,R]- and (+)-[S,S]-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydro-6-nitrochrysene in the rat.

Authors:  Yuan-Wan Sun; Joseph B Guttenplan; Timothy Cooper; Jacek Krzeminski; Ceaser Aliaga; Telih Boyiri; Wieslawa Kosinska; Zhong-Lin Zhao; Kun-Ming Chen; Arthur Berg; Shantu Amin; Karam El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  Repair-Resistant DNA Lesions.

Authors:  Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.739

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.