| Literature DB >> 34901214 |
Bolun Li1, Xiaomin Song1, Wenjun Guo1, Yangfeng Hou1, Huiyuan Hu1,2, Weipeng Ge1, Tianfei Fan1, Zhifa Han1,3, Zhiwei Li1, Peiran Yang4, Ran Gao1, Hongmei Zhao1, Jing Wang1.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is potentially life-threatening in aging population due to the risk of aortic rupture and a lack of optimal treatment. The roles of different vascular and immune cells in AAA formation and pathogenesis remain to be future characterized. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on an angiotensin (Ang) II-induced mouse model of AAA. Macrophages, B cells, T cells, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells were identified through bioinformatic analyses. The discovery of multiple subtypes of macrophages, such as the re-polarization of Trem2 + Acp5 + osteoclast-like and M2-like macrophages toward the M1 type macrophages, indicates the heterogenous nature of macrophages during AAA development. More interestingly, we defined CD45+COL1+ fibrocytes, which was further validated by flow cytometry and immunostaining in mouse and human AAA tissues. We then reconstituted these fibrocytes into mice with Ang II-induced AAA and found the recruitment of these fibrocytes in mouse AAA. More importantly, the fibrocyte treatment exhibited a protective effect against AAA development, perhaps through modulating extracellular matrix production and thus enhancing aortic stability. Our study reveals the heterogeneity of macrophages and the involvement of a novel cell type, fibrocyte, in AAA. Fibrocyte may represent a potential cell therapy target for AAA.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; cell atlas; cell therapy; fibrocytes; single cell sequencing
Year: 2021 PMID: 34901214 PMCID: PMC8652037 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.753711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Aortic and aneurysmal cell populations revealed by scRNA-seq. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) representation of the aligned gene expression data from saline-treated (control, n = 7,914, in blue) and Ang II-treated (AAA, n = 9,338, in red) aortae of apolipoprotein E (ApoE−/−) mice, showing partition of 15 distinct clusters (left panel) and cell identities (right panel). (C) The expression of marker genes exhibited on UMAP plot (gene expression log-normalized by Seurat). (D) UMAP representation of cells showing cellular origins. (E) Stacked column chart of the proportion of each identified cell type in control and AAA group individually (Control vs. AAA). (F) Heatmap of key genes differentially expressed after Ang II infusion (in the left panel) and the associated Gene Ontology (GO) pathway enrichment (in the right panel). Heatmap showed the relative expression level in each cluster. (G) Pie chart of the proportion of fibroblast subtypes in control and AAA groups (Control vs. AAA). SMC: smooth muscle cell.
Figure 2Heterogeneity and re-polarization of macrophage subtypes in AAA. (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) representation of the aligned gene expression data in macrophages separated from Figure 1B. (B) Heatmap of highly expressed genes (HEGs) from three subtypes of macrophages in (A). (C) Heatmap of key genes differentially expressed (in the left panel) after Ang II infusion and the associated GO pathway enrichment (in the right panel). Heatmap showed the relative expression level in each cluster of macrophages. (D) Pseudo-time plot by trajectory analysis of three clusters of macrophages (Cluster 0: Trem2+Acp5+ macrophages; Cluster 1: Mrc1+Cbr2+ M2-like macrophages; Cluster 2: Il1b+Ccr2+ M1-like macrophages). (E) The expression of key genes in pseudo-time plot.
Figure 3Identification of fibrocytes that were distinct from macrophages in AAA. (A) Heatmap of highly expressed genes (HEGs) from three subtypes of macrophages and fibrocytes (Cluster 3), The HEGs of fibrocytes compared with macrophage subtypes were labeled (lower part), and the HEGs of macrophage subtypes (upper part) were the same as Figure 2B. (B) Bar plot of Gene Ontology (GO) pathway enrichment of the HEGs in fibrocytes. (C) Pseudo-time plot by trajectory analysis of three clusters of macrophages (Cluster 0: Trem2+Acp5+ macrophages; Cluster 1: Mrc1+Cbr2+ M2-like macrophages; Cluster 2: Il1b+Ccr2+ M1-like macrophages; Cluster 3: Cd34+Col1a2+ fibrocytes).
Figure 4Identification and function of fibrocytes in AAA pathogenesis. (A) Dot plot showing the expression of classic fibrocyte markers and the top 5 highly expressed genes compared with macrophages. (B) The ROC curve identifying the sensitivity and specificity of the co-expression of distinct marker genes. (C) Violin plots of the expression levels of the classic marker genes that identify fibrocytes during Ang II infusion. (D) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of fibrocytes during Ang II infusion. (E) Bar plot of Gene Ontology (GO) pathway enrichment of DEGs in fibrocytes. (F) Dot plot showing the expression of 10 shared DEGs in Ang II model and human ATAA.
Figure 5Validation and localization of fibrocytes in AAA. (A) Representative images of H&E staining and the immunofluorescence images of normal aorta and AAA tissue from mice stained with COL1 (green) and CD45 (red). (B) Quantification of the number of fibrocytes per aortic area (/mm2). The quantitative data were shown as mean ± SEM, and the difference between the groups was evaluated by Mann-Whitney test. (Saline: n = 5; Ang II: n = 10). (C) Representative images of H&E staining and the immunofluorescence images of normal aorta and AAA tissue from human stained with COL1 (green) and CD45 (red). (D) Quantification of the number of fibrocytes per aortic area (/mm2). The quantitative data were shown as mean ± SEM, and the difference between the groups was evaluated by Mann-Whitney test. *p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.001. (non-AAA: n = 3; AAA: n = 5).
Figure 6Alleviation of Ang II-induced AAA formation by reconstitution of fibrocytes. (A) Schematic diagram of the fibrocytes reconstitution experiment. (B) Survival curves of control and Ang II-infused mice with or without fibrocytes reconstitution [Fibrocyte (–): n = 5 for control mice and n = 25 for Ang II-infusion mice; Fibrocyte (+): n = 5 for control mice and n = 15 for Ang II-infusion mice]. (C) The incidence rate of AAA in control and Ang II-infused mice with or without fibrocytes reconstitution. Fisher exact method was used to test for statistical significance. (D) Representative images of whole aortae. (E) Quantification of AAA diameter (mm). (F) Representative images of H&E staining of abdominal aortae. Scale bar = 250 μm. (G) Representative images of elastin staining in four groups of mice. Scale bar = 25μm. (H) Quantification of the elastin score. The quantitative data were shown as mean ± SEM, and the difference between multiple groups was evaluated by two-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. [Fibrocyte (–): n = 5 for control mice and n = 14 for Ang II-infusion mice; Fibrocyte (+): n = 5 for control mice and n = 13 for Ang II-infusion mice].