| Literature DB >> 34900931 |
Malihe Zeraati1, Ali Mohammadi2, Somayeh Vafaei3, Narendra Pal Singh Chauhan4, Ghasem Sargazi5.
Abstract
In this paper, we have reported an innovative greener method for developing copper-metal organic frameworks (Cu-MOFs) using caffeic acid (CA) as a linker extracted from Satureja hortensis using ultrasonic bath. The density functional theory is used to discuss the Cu-MOF-binding reaction mechanism. In order to achieve a discrepancy between the energy levels of the interactive precursor orbitals, the molecules have been optimized using the B3LYP/6-31G method. The Taguchi method was used to optimize the key parameters for the synthesis of Cu-MOF. FT-IR, XRD, nitrogen adsorption, and SEM analyses are used to characterize it. The adsorption/desorption and SEM analyses suggested that Cu-MOF has a larger surface area of 284.94 m2/g with high porosity. Cu-MOF has shown anticancer activities against the human breast cancer (MDA-MB-468) cell lines, and it could be a potent candidate for clinical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Cu-MOF; Satureja hortensis; anticancer; green synthesis; lignin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900931 PMCID: PMC8660856 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.722990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
SCHEME 1Proposed structures (1 and 2) of Cu-MOF.
Selected controlling factors and their level.
| Controlling factors | Levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Reactant ratio (extract/CuNO3) | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 65 | 75 | 85 | 95 |
| Time of reaction (min) | 65 | 75 | 85 | 95 |
| Feed rate (ml/min) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
FIGURE 1Optimized structure of Cu(NO3)2 and CA precursors along with their HOMO and LUMO.
The experimental design with computed selectivity and their corresponding S/N ratios.
| No. | Controlling factors | BET surface area (m2/g) | S/N ratios | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactant ratio (extract/CuNO3) | Time of reaction (min) | Temperature (°C) | Feed rate (ml/min) | |||
| 1 | 1 | 65 | 45 | 1 | 946 | 59.51 |
| 2 | 1 | 75 | 60 | 2 | 302 | 49.6 |
| 3 | 1 | 85 | 75 | 3 | 220 | 46.84 |
| 4 | 1 | 95 | 90 | 4 | 859 | 52.88 |
| 5 | 1.5 | 65 | 60 | 3 | 441 | 58.67 |
| 6 | 1.5 | 75 | 45 | 4 | 12.04 | 54.88 |
| 7 | 1.5 | 85 | 90 | 1 | 1,204 | 10.75 |
| 8 | 1.5 | 95 | 75 | 2 | 555 | 21.61 |
| 9 | 2 | 65 | 75 | 4 | 1,172 | 61.37 |
| 10 | 2 | 75 | 90 | 3 | 33 | 45.34 |
| 11 | 2 | 85 | 45 | 2 | 1,642 | 30.37 |
| 12 | 2 | 95 | 60 | 1 | 2,416 | 64.3 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 65 | 90 | 2 | 2,322 | 67.31 |
| 14 | 2.5 | 75 | 75 | 1 | 1,965 | 65.86 |
| 15 | 2.5 | 85 | 60 | 4 | 185 | 66.44 |
| 16 | 2.5 | 95 | 45 | 3 | 2,100 | 67.66 |
Calculated S/N ratios and the contribution of each controlling factor.
| Level | Reactant ratio (extract/CuNO3) | Temperature (°C) | Time of reaction (min) | Feed rate (ml/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33.66 | 40.28 | 32.97 | 43.66 |
| 2 | 27.75 | 21.86 | 33.87 | 39.03 |
| 3 | 35.93 | 34.53 | 37.25 | 29.14 |
| 4 | 41.24 | 41.92 | 34.49 | 26.75 |
| Delta | 13.49 | 20.06 | 4.27 | 16.91 |
FIGURE 2(A) Average value of the S/N ratio and (B) mean at four levels for each parameter.
FIGURE 3The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of Cu(NO3)2 and CA.
FIGURE 4Typical FTIR spectrum of Cu-MOF.
FIGURE 5BET isotherm of the Cu-MOF at 77 K.
FIGURE 6SEM image of the Cu-MOF.
FIGURE 7The X-ray diffraction pattern of Cu-MOF.
FIGURE 8Cytotoxicity of various concentrations of herbal extraction and Ag-MOF (0–100 μM) against human breast cancer cells after incubation for 24 and 48 h (A, B).