| Literature DB >> 34900857 |
Yingzhi Zhou1,2, Yi He1,2, Yunan Chang1,2, Xiaorong Peng1,2, Ruiqiu Zhao1,2, Mingli Peng3, Peng Hu3, Hong Ren3, Min Chen3, Hongmei Xu1,2.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The immune status of children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in different phases is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the phenotype and cytokine-producing ability of natural killer (NK) and T cells and to better understand the immune characteristics of children with different phases of CHB.Entities:
Keywords: NK cell; T cell; children; chronic hepatitis B; immune response; natural history
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900857 PMCID: PMC8656424 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.736023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 6.89 (3.59, 9.84) | 6.10 (4.05, 10.99) | 5.18 (4.53, 5.18) | 6.98 (4.60, 8.87) | 0.953 |
| Gender (male/female), | 26/29 | 26/19 | 9/3 | 10/6 | 0.305 |
| ALT/ULN, median (IQR) | 0.87 (0.69, 1.16) | 3.40 (2.03, 8.32) | 0.49 (0.41, 0.72) | 0.40(0.38, 0.49) |
|
| Log10 HBV DNA (IU/ml), median (IQR) | 8.25 (7.96, 8.46) | 7.81 (6.78, 8.52) | 2.60 (2.60–2.80) | NA |
|
| HBsAg ( | 55/0 | 45/0 | 12/0 | NA | NA |
| HBsAb ( | 2/53 | 2/43 | 1/11 | NA | 0.649 |
| HBeAg ( | 55/0 | 45/0 | 2/10 | NA |
|
| HBeAb ( | 0/55 | 3/42 | 10/2 | NA |
|
| Genotype (B/C), | 10/7 | 24/17 | 2/0 | NA | 0.701 |
: 2 children had weakly positive HBeAg.
IT, immune-tolerant phase; IA, immune-active phase; IC, immune-control phase; IQR, interquartile range; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; NA, not applicable. The bold values mean p < 0.05.
Figure 1Phenotypes of natural killer (NK) cells in different clinical phases. (A) Representative flow histogram plots of NKp30, NKp46, and HLA-DR on NK cells. (B) Frequencies of NKp30, NKp46, and HLA-DR on NK cells. The p-values below the abscissa represent the results of the Kruskal–Wallis test of the four groups. Numbers above the lines represent the p-values of the multiple pairwise comparison with statistical significance. A value of p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Phenotypes of T cells in different clinical phases. (A) Representative flow histogram plots (left) and frequencies (right) of CD38 on CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. (B) Frequencies of CD38 on CD4+ and CD8+ memory T subsets. The p-values below the abscissa represent the results of the Kruskal–Wallis test of the four groups. Numbers above the lines represent the p-values of the multiple pairwise comparison with statistical significance. A value of p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Cytokine-producing ability of NK cells and T cells in different clinical phases. (A) Representative flow dot plots of IFNγ and TNFα produced by NK cells and CD8+ T cells. (B) Frequencies of IFNγ and TNFα produced by NK cells and CD8+ T cells. The p-values below the abscissa represent the results of the Kruskal–Wallis test of the four groups. Numbers above the lines represent the p-values of the multiple pairwise comparison with statistical significance. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 4Forest plot of multivariate logistic regression analysis comparing the immune-active (IA) phase with the immune-tolerant (IT) phase (IT phase is the reference group).
Figure 5Correlation of activation markers with alanine transaminase (ALT) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels.
Figure 6Correlation matrix of different immune cell phenotypes.
Factors associated with NK cells secreting cytokines in multivariate linear regression analysis.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 0.40 (−0.11, 0.92) | 0.16 | 0.125 | 0.26 (−0.01, 0.53) | 0.19 | 0.058 | |
| Gender (male vs. female) | −1.23 (−4.87, 2.40) | −0.07 | 0.502 | −0.47 (−2.45, 1.51) | −0.05 | 0.636 | |
| ALT/ULN | 0.72 (0.30, 1.14) | 0.37 |
| 0.31 (0.09, 0.54) | 0.29 |
| |
| HBV DNA (log10 IU/ml) | −0.24 (−1.80, 1.33) | −0.05 | 0.764 | −0.40 (−1.25, 0.44) | −0.15 | 0.346 | |
| HBeAg ( | −2.23 (−12.31, 7.86) | −0.07 | 0.662 | 0.33 (−5.14, 5.80) | 0.02 | 0.904 | |
| Genotype (genotype C is the reference group) | B | −1.71 (−6.84, 3.43) | −0.08 | 0.511 | −2.29 (−5.02, 0.44) | −0.22 | 0.099 |
| N | 0.11 (−4.81, 5.03) | 0.01 | 0.964 | −0.70 (−3.42, 2.03) | −0.07 | 0.612 | |
| NK/lymphocyte (%) | 0.27 (−0.10, 0.63) | 0.19 | 0.153 | 0.11 (−0.09, 0.31) | 0.14 | 0.287 | |
| CD56dim/NK (%) | −0.47 (−0.91, −0.04) | −0.26 |
| −0.19 (−0.43, 0.05) | −0.19 | 0.121 | |
| NKp30+/NK (%) | −0.09 (−0.22, 0.04) | −0.19 | 0.173 | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.03) | −0.15 | 0.298 | |
| NKp46+/NK (%) | 0.22 (0.09, 0.36) | 0.47 |
| 0.05 (−0.02, 0.13) | 0.21 | 0.163 | |
| HLA-DR+/NK (%) | 0.01 (−0.12, 0.14) | 0.01 | 0.886 | 0.05 (−0.02, 0.12) | 0.14 | 0.182 | |
NK.
N, not detected; CI, confidence interval; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. The bold values mean p < 0.05.
Factors associated with T-cell-secreting cytokines in multivariate linear regression analysis.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 1.99 (0.68, 3.31) | 0.73 |
| 0.54 (−0.08, 1.16) | 0.42 | 0.088 | |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 2.62 (−2.40, 7.63) | 0.13 | 0.301 | 0.14 (−2.22, 2.51) | 0.02 | 0.904 | |
| ALT/ULN | 2.62 (−2.40, 7.63) | 0.24 | 0.071 | 0.28 (0.01, 0.55) | 0.27 |
| |
| HBV DNA (log10 IU/ml) | 0.53 (−0.05, 1.10) | 0.35 | 0.099 | 0.31 (−0.75, 1.37) | 0.12 | 0.561 | |
| HBeAg ( | 1.88 (−0.36, 4.12) | −0.26 | 0.202 | −1.01 (−7.38, 5.36) | −0.06 | 0.752 | |
| Genotype (genotype C is the reference group) | B | −8.70 (−22.2, 4.81) | −0.30 | 0.058 | −1.42 (−4.53, 1.70) | −0.14 | 0.367 |
| N | −6.40 (−13.01, 0.21) | 0.11 | 0.537 | 1.47 (−1.79, 4.73) | 0.16 | 0.370 | |
| CD8+T/lymphocyte (%) | 2.14 (−4.77, 9.05) | −0.02 | 0.886 | −0.03 (−0.21, 0.14) | −0.05 | 0.717 | |
| Tcm/CD8+T (%) | 0.30 (−0.18, 0.77) | 0.20 | 0.218 | 0.06 (−0.16, 0.29) | 0.09 | 0.585 | |
| Tem/CD8+T (%) | −0.17 (−0.86, 0.51) | −0.07 | 0.612 | 0.27 (−0.05, 0.59) | 0.22 | 0.099 | |
| Teff/CD8+T (%) | 0.18 (−0.08, 0.43) | 0.24 | 0.164 | 0.14 (0.02, 0.26) | 0.40 |
| |
| CD38+/CD8+T (%) | 0.41 (0.05, 0.77) | 0.55 |
| 0.05 (−0.12, 0.22) | 0.15 | 0.539 | |
| CD4+T/lymphocyte (%) | −0.37 (−0.85, 0.11) | −0.25 | 0.128 | −0.02 (−0.24, 0.21) | −0.03 | 0.878 | |
| Tcm/CD4+T (%) | −0.33 (−1.01, 0.36) | −0.28 | 0.343 | −0.21 (−0.54, 0.11) | −0.38 | 0.190 | |
| Tem/CD4+T (%) | −1.56 (−2.75, −0.37) | −0.66 |
| −0.31 (−0.87, 0.26) | −0.28 | 0.280 | |
| Teff/CD4+T (%) | 0.44 (−2.35, 3.23) | 0.04 | 0.753 | 0.00 (−1.31, 1.32) | 0.00 | 0.997 | |
| CD38+/CD4+T (%) | −0.25 (−1.02, 0.52) | −0.28 | 0.515 | −0.11 (−0.48, 0.25) | −0.27 | 0.536 | |
CD8+Tnaive and CD4+Tnaive cells were excluded from the regression model due to multicolinearity.
N, not detected; CI, confidence interval; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBeAg, HBV e antigen. The bold values mean p < 0.05.