| Literature DB >> 34900856 |
Niels Lodeweyckx1, Kristien Wouters2, Kristien J Ledeganck3, Dominique Trouet1,3.
Abstract
Background: In this study, the profile of urinary EGF excretion (uEGF/uCreat) was mapped in children presenting with prolonged proteinuria or with nephrotic syndrome refractory to or dependent of steroids. We investigated whether uEGF/uCreat could be linked to the underlying biopsy result, taking into account its response to immunosuppressive medication and to ACE inhibition, as well as genetic predisposition.Entities:
Keywords: ACE-inhibition; diagnostic biomarker; genetic predisposition; minimal change disease; urinary epidermal growth factor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900856 PMCID: PMC8657767 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.727954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Overview of patients' characteristics, clinical presentation, results of histology, and genetic screening.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 118 (100%) | 91(100%) | ||
| Male | 73/118 (62%) | 58/91 (64%) | ||
| Female | 45/118 (38%) | 33/91 (36%) | ||
|
| 118 (100%) | 91 (100%) | ||
| Mean (SD) | 11 (4.4) | |||
| Median (min–max) | 11 (3–19) | |||
|
| 118 (100%) | 91 (100%) | ||
| Nephrotic syndrome | 75/118 (64%) | 54/91 (59%) | ||
| Proteinuria | 8/118 (7%) | 6/91 (7%) | ||
| Isolated hematuria | 20/118 (18%) | 17/91 (19%) | ||
| Proteinuria + hematuria | 14/118 (12%) | 14/91 (15%) | ||
|
| 110 (93%) | 87 (96%) | ||
| Minimal change | 45/110 (41%) | 31/87 (36%) | ||
| FSGS | 20/110 (18%) | 18/87 (21%) | ||
| IgA nephropathy | 17/110 (15%) | 17/87 (20%) | ||
| Alport | 20/110 (18%) | 15/87 (17%) | ||
| Other glomerulopathy | 8/110 (7%) | 6/87 (7%) | ||
|
| 87 (74%) | 69 (76%) | ||
| No genetic cause | 45/87 (52%) | 37/69 (54%) | ||
| Causal mutation | 21/87 (24%) | 15/69 (22%) | ||
| Mutation, unclear significance | 21/87 (24%) | 17/69 (25%) | ||
In the left panel, an overview is provided of all patients included into this study. The right panel shows an overview of the patients from whom at least one urine sample was collected and for whom uEGF values are thus available.
FSGS, Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis; SD, standard deviation; uEGF, urinary epidermal growth factor; uCreat, urinary creatinine.
Figure 1Mosaic plots visualizing the relation between (A) presentation and biopsy, (B) presentation and genetics, and (C) biopsy and genetics.
Comparison of uEGF/uCreat between different subgroups.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Nephrotic syndrome vs. healthy children | 54 (135) | −0.62 (0.097) | −46% (−56 to −35%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Proteinuria vs. healthy children | 20 (46) | −0.15 (0.13) | −14% (−33 to 11%) | 0.24 | 0.73 |
|
| |||||
| Minimal change vs. healthy children | 31 (79) | −0.57 (0.12) | −44% (−56 to −28%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN vs. healthy children | 41 (99) | −0.44 (0.11) | −36% (−48 to −20%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Alport vs. healthy children | 15 (27) | −0.012 (0.16) | −1% (−28 to 36%) | 0.94 | 1.00 |
|
| |||||
| No genetic cause vs. healthy children | 37 (89) | −0.54 (0.11) | −42% (−53 to −28%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Causal mutation vs. healthy children | 15 (30) | −0.37 (0.15) | −31% (−49 to −6%) | 0.017 | 0.068 |
| Significance unclear vs. healthy children | 17 (41) | 0.027 (0.14) | 3% (−22 to 35%) | 0.85 | 1.00 |
|
| |||||
| ACE vs. healthy children | 70 (157) | −0.32 (0.10) | −28% (−41 to −11%) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| No ACE vs. healthy children | 21 (53) | −0.66 (0.13) | −49% (−60 to −33%) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparisons are based on linear mixed effects models with outcome log(uEGF/uCreat), random intercept, fixed effect for age, and one explanatory factor at a time (Presentation, Biopsy, Genetics, and ACE).
Reference group is healthy children: 49 children, uEGF/uCreat measured once.
Number of patients, between brackets total number of uEGF/uCreat measurements in this subgroup.
Percentage difference compared to healthy.
Bonferroni–Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons (over all comparisons in this table).
Comparisons based on linear mixed effects models with outcome log(uEGF/uCreat), random intercept, fixed effect for age, Cyclosporine/Tacrolimus, and MMF/Rituximab.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| CNI vs. no CNI | −0.44 (0.11) | −36% (−48 to −20%) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| MMF/Rituximab vs. no MMF/Rituximab | −0.11 (0.10) | −11% (−27 to 9%) | 0.27 |
CNI, calcineurin inhibitor.
Biopsy results in relation to the treatment regimen.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporine/Tacrolimus | 17 (55%) | 15 (37%) | 0.19 |
| MMF/Rituximab | 10 (32%) | 18 (44%) | 0.45 |
In this crosstab, the biopsy results are displayed according to the treatment regimen, hereby providing the absolute numbers and the percentage (%).
Nephrotic patients and non-nephrotic proteinuria in relation to the treatment regimen.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporine/Tacrolimus | 30 (56%) | 2 (10%) | 0.001 |
| MMF/Rituximab | 18 (33%) | 9 (45%) | 0.51 |
In this crosstab, nephrotic patients and patients with non-nephrotic proteinuria are displayed according to the treatment regimen, hereby providing the absolute numbers and the percentage (%).
The effect of ACE inhibition on uEGF/uCreat according to the biopsy diagnosis.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Total: ACE vs. No ACE | 0.30 (0.11) | 30% | 0.007 | 0.044 |
| MCD: ACE vs. No ACE | −0.15 (0.16) | −14% | 0.34 | 0.68 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN: ACE vs. No | 0.58 (0.16) | 78% | <0.001 | 0.003 |
|
| ||||
| MCD vs. | 0.45 (0.20) | 57% | 0.026 | 0.11 |
| MCD vs. | −0.49 (0.15) | −38% | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN vs. | −0.93 (0.17) | −61% | <0.001 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| MCD vs. | −0.28 (0.13) | −24% | 0.039 | 0.12 |
| MCD vs. | −0.66 (0.18) | −48% | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN vs. | −0.38 (0.16) | −32% | 0.019 | 0.096 |
| MCD vs. | −0.64 (0.13) | −47% | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN vs. | −0.36 (0.11) | −30% | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Alport vs. | 0.026 (0.16) | 3% | 0.87 | 0.87 |
Comparisons based on linear mixed effects models with outcome log(uEGF/uCreat), random intercept, fixed effect for age, and combination of biopsy result and ACE inhibition.
Bonferroni–Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons (over all comparisons in this table).
Figure 2Graphical compilation visualizing the absolute values of U EGF/uCreat for age, according to the different clusters of biopsy results, comparing patients treated with ACE inhibitor to those without ACE inhibition.
Comparisons based on linear mixed effects models with outcome log(uEGF/uCreat), random intercept, fixed effect for age, and combination of biopsy result and ACE inhibition.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Total: ACE vs. No ACE | 0.16 (0.13) | 17% | 0.23 | 0.69 |
| Min Change: ACE vs. No | −0.11 (0.18) | −10% | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| FSGS/IgA/GN: ACE vs. No | 0.61 (0.21) | 84% | 0.004 | 0.021 |
|
| ||||
| MCD vs. | −0.037 (0.20) | −4% | 0.85 | 1.00 |
|
| ||||
| MCD vs. | 0.68 (0.26) | 98% | 0.009 | 0.039 |
Bonferroni–Holm adjustment for multiple comparisons (over all comparisons in this table).