| Literature DB >> 34900653 |
Zeinab Ghaderi1, Fatemeh Nazari2, Vahid Shaygannejad3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) on the severity of fatigue among women with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture points; complementary therapies; fatigue; multiple sclerosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900653 PMCID: PMC8607895 DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_188_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res ISSN: 1735-9066
Figure 1CONSORT flow of participant through the study
Comparison of demographic characteristics and clinical data of the participants in the two groups
| Variable | Case group ( | Sham* group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.44 (8.52) | 36.00 (8.38) | 0.85 |
| Duration of MS** (years) | 9.28 (5.67) | 7.74 (5.53) | 0.34 |
| Level of Education | 0.08 | ||
| Under diploma | 4 (16) | 8 (32) | |
| Diploma | 11 (44) | 12 (48) | |
| Collegiate | 10 (40) | 5 (20) | |
| Marital status | 0.73 | ||
| Married | 20 (80) | 19 (76) | |
| Single | 5 (20) | 6 (24) | |
| Occupational status | 0.42 | ||
| Housewife | 20 (80) | 23 (92) | |
| Employed | 5 (20) | 2 (8) | |
| Pattern of disease | |||
| Relapsing-remitting | 22 (88) | 25 (100) | 0.23 |
| Secondary progressive | 3 (12) | 0 (0) |
*Sham is “a treatment or procedure that is performed as a control and that is similar to, but omits a key therapeutic element of the treatment or procedure under investigation”. **Multiple sclerosis
Comparison of the mean fatigue intensity score at different time periods in the two groups
| Time | Case group Mean (SD) | Sham* group Mean (SD) | Statistical test | Mean Difference | Std. Error Difference | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Before the intervention | 5.48 (0.75) | 5.39 (0.71) | 0.42 | 0.67 | 0.08 | 0.20 | -0.33 | 0.50 |
| Immediately after the intervention | 3.05 (0.89) | 5.15 (0.94) | -8.08 | <0.001 | -2.09 | 0.25 | -2.61 | -1.57 |
| Four weeks after the intervention | 3.10 (0.81) | 5.59 (0.57) | -12.54 | <0.001 | -2.49 | 0.19 | -2.89 | -2.09 |
| Repeated measures ANOVA | ||||||||
| | 160.70 | 7.42 | ||||||
| | <0.001 | 0.002 | ||||||
*Sham is “a treatment or procedure that is performed as a control and that is similar to, but omits a key therapeutic element of the treatment or procedure under investigation”
Paired comparison of mean fatigue intensity scores at different time periods using LSD* follow-up test in the two groups
| Groups | Time | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Before and immediately after | Before and 4 weeks after | Immediately and 4 weeks after | |
| Case | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.66 |
| Sham** | 0.053 | 0.057 | 0.002 |
*LSD: Least significant difference, ** Sham is “a treatment or procedure that is performed as a control and that is similar to, but omits a key therapeutic element of the treatment or procedure under investigation”