| Literature DB >> 34900180 |
Li Zhu1, Yueqiu Gong1.
Abstract
Objective: Breast milk is the best food for newly born infants because it is more digestible and can relieve infants' gastrointestinal burdens. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application effect of abdominal acupoint massage on feeding intolerance in premature infants.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900180 PMCID: PMC8660219 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2883597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparison of the general information between the two groups ( ± s).
| Group | Experimental group | Control group |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 33.52 ± 2.04 | 33.90 ± 2.00 | 0.67 | 0.51 |
| Birth time (d) | 5.37 ± 1.66 | 5.41 ± 1.27 | 0.10 | 0.92 |
| Body mass (kg) | 2.88 ± 0.93 | 2.81 ± 0.99 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Height (cm) | 26.51 ± 6.24 | 26.38 ± 6.08 | 0.07 | 0.94 |
| Gender (male/female) | 13/12 | 14/11 | 0.08 | 0.78 |
| First parturition (cases) | 23 | 22 | 0.22 | 0.64 |
| Family heredity history | 0 | 0 | ||
| Congenital disease | 0 | 0 |
Comparison of the incidence of feeding intolerance of the premature infants between the two groups.
| Group | Gastric retention | Abdominal distension | Vomiting | Total incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 0 | 4 | 0 | 16% |
| Control group | 2 | 8 | 5 | 60% |
|
| 10.27 | |||
|
| 0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of the MNA nutritional status score between the two groups. Note: the abscissa represented the experimental group and control group, while the ordinate represented the MNA score. The comparison of the MNA score between the experimental group of 25.26 ± 2.06 points and the control group of 20.14 ± 2.33 points, with statistical significance, t = 8.23, and P < 0.001.
Comparison of the body mass and development state of the premature infants between the two groups ( ± s).
| Group | Changes of body mass (kg) | Changes of height (cm) | Changes of head circumference (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 3.61 ± 1.03 | 5.57 ± 2.04 | 3.37 ± 0.48 |
| Control group | 1.39 ± 1.25 | 4.00 ± 1.37 | 1.28 ± 0.33 |
|
| 6.85 | 3.19 | 17.94 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
Figure 2Comparison of the length of hospital stay of the premature infants between the two groups. Note: the abscissa represented the experimental group and control group, while the ordinate represented the length of hospital stay (LOS, d). The comparison of the length of hospital stay between the experimental group of 30.16 ± 3.54 d and the control group of 35.29 ± 4.08 d, with statistical significance, t = 4.75, and P < 0.001.
Comparison of the response rate between the two groups.
| Group | Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total response rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 16 | 6 | 3 | 88% |
| Control group | 6 | 9 | 10 | 60% |
|
| 5.09 | |||
|
| 0.02 |