| Literature DB >> 34900162 |
Zahra Davoudi1, Amirhossein Taromchi2, Bahram Kazemi3, Mojgan Bandehpour1,3, Nariman Mosaffa4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immunization is a promising strategy to combat against the life-threatening infections by Multi Drug Resistance Acinetobacter baumannii. In this study, we directed to design and evaluate the efficacy of a recombinant multi-epitope protein against this pathogen.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; BAM complex; Multi drug resistant; OmpA; Recombinant multi-epitope protein (rMEP)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34900162 PMCID: PMC8629821 DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v13i5.7429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Microbiol ISSN: 2008-3289
Predicted and selected linear B-cell and T-cell – MHC I and II Binding epitopes of OmpA, Bam A, Bam B, Bam C, Bam D, Bam E of A. baumannii via IEDB server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OmpA | LGYTFQDSQHKVAEKLSEYP | 1.133 | MLVAAPLAAADASRL | 0.54 |
| BamA | ALVSAMAAVQQAYAADDFVV | 1.104 | NAVKQLLLRKYGNAG | 0.19 |
| DANGDSQYDTEKGECKVPEE | 1.035 | KSGIKYQLSALPLGG | 0.7 | |
| BamB | PVVLGSDLIVGDLDGVLHLI | 1.124 | VAAYRGKQRLWEKKV | 1.14 |
| TTAFGAAVVGGDNGRVSA | 1.520 | |||
| BamC | YKITMLALSLGVASAFVGCS | 1.099 | KGEVAAYRGKQRLWE | 1.48 |
| SSSEAPSASPADNEADDAAQ | 1.302 | KSATDAANAAQNR | 1.21 | |
| BamD | SGKEETEETTNTPVEAPKSE | 1.092 | QNFVDLIRRFPSSQY | 0.13 |
| YKITMLALSLGVASAFVGCS | 1.230 | YQNFVDLIRRFPSSQ | 0.78 | |
| BamE | KLVLTLFVTSLLAGCSIFGV | 1.136 | FQQVRFLLGSPTVTD | 1.48 |
IEDB B-cell epitope scores show antigenicity, accessibility, flexibility, hydrophilicity of prediction epitopes. High score is better.
IEDB T-cell epitope scores show IC50 values for peptides binding to specific MHC molecules. Low score is reliable.
Fig. 1.rMEP 3D structure analysis. A) Ramachandran for validation geometry quality of multi-epitope protein structure. B) The Z plot of this model was −1.5 that was in the range of native conformations. C) Prediction of the 3D structure of multi-epitope protein using I-TASSER server with C-score 2.66, Estimated TM-score 0.41 ± 0.14 and Estimated RMSD 13.3 ± 4.1Å
Fig. 2.Double digestion of the recombinant plasmid using BamHI and HandIII restriction enzymes. lane 1, Undigested pET26b-rMEP; lane 2, 100bp DNA Ladder; lane 3, Double digestion of the pET26b- rMEP sequence, insertion size is ∼1128bp.
Fig. 3.SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of multi-epitope protein. (A) Expression analysis of rMEP. lane 1: induced BL21-rMEP 45.5KDa; lane 2 un induced cells lysates, lane 3 control; lane 4: Standard protein marker. (B) Western blot analysis of rMEP using anti His tag antibody. lane1: rMEP with MW ∼45.5KDa, Lane 2: un induced E. coli BL21 lysate. Lane 3: Standard protein marker. (C)Interaction of the rMEP and positive sera by Western blot analysis. Lane 1. Standard protein marker; lane 2. induced cells lysates. (D) Purification analysis of protein. lane 1: Standard protein marker; lane 2: Washed buffer; lane 3: Eluted protein 45.5KDa
The compared secondary structure of the purified protein predicted using GOR4 server with the secondary structure that revealed by Circular Dichroism
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| GOR4 predicted | 41.93 | 13.01 | 45.06 |
| Circular Dichroism | 40.8 | 21.1 | 38.1 |
Fig. 4.ELISA analysis. A) The specific total antibody titer in different dilution of ICU staff, patients and healthy group sera in reaction with A. baumannii using ELISA assay. B) Comparative analysis of specific total antibody titer of sera in reaction with A. baumannii, recombinant multiepitope protein(rMEP) and control group using ELISA assay. Data signifies Mean of the OD450 ± SD with P> 0.001.