Literature DB >> 34900061

Effect of Synaid on cognitive functions and mood in elderly subjects with self-perceived loss of memory after COVID-19 infection.

Marilisa Bove1, Federica Fogacci2, Silvia Quattrocchi1, Maddalena Veronesi1, Arrigo F G Cicero2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is growing attention towards the possible long-term effect of COVID-19 on neuropsychiatric disorders.
METHODS: We tested the effect of a combined nutraceutical (Synaid) with known nootropic effects in 40 elderly patients with self-perceived cognitive decline after SARS-CoV-2 infection, treated at home or in hospital.
RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, Synaid significantly improved functional status, MMSE and the main psychological disorders associated with mild cognitive impairment, both in patients previously cared for at home and in hospital because of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Synaid was well tolerated and effective in improving cognitive function and psychosocial parameters after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Copyright:
© 2021 Termedia & Banach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; cognitive function; dietary supplement; nutraceutical

Year:  2021        PMID: 34900061      PMCID: PMC8641516          DOI: 10.5114/aoms/141502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Acute consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection have gained great attention in the scientific literature, particularly regarding respiratory and cardiovascular effects [1]. Nonetheless, there has been noted increasing consideration towards the possible long-term effect of COVID-19 on neurological and psychiatric disorders, as well. Some reports have shown that cognitive impairments can also begin in patients recovered from COVID-19, which is likely to be linked to the underlying inflammatory processes [2]. In fact, severely affected COVID-19 patients experienced high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute respiratory dysfunction, and they often required assisted ventilation. Straightforward negative effects of the immune reaction, an acceleration or an aggravation of pre-existing cognitive deficits, or a new induction of a neurodegenerative disease could cause cognitive decline [3]. In particular, the hippocampus seems to be more vulnerable to coronavirus infections, which increase the probability of post-infection memory impairment and acceleration of neurodegenerative disorders associated with cognitive decline [4]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Italy was one of the Western countries most severely hit [5]. Consequently, we expect a considerable number of long-term health consequences in the coming years. In this pilot study, we aimed to demonstrate the positive effect of a combined nutraceutical with known nootropic effects [6] in patients with self-perceived cognitive decline after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

For this purpose, we enrolled 40 elderly subjects (mean age: 68 ±3) with an MMSE score at baseline between 20 and 27, recovered from COVID during the last 6 months, and with subjective cognitive decline after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exclusion criteria were: Previous diagnosis of cognitive decline or dementia, Confirmed diagnosis of dementia at the enrolment visit, Personal history of cardiovascular diseases or diabetes, Blood pressure or LDL cholesterol values out of target, Any pharmacological treatment potentially affecting cognitive performance. Patients could have experienced hospital care or home care. All patients were treated with Synaid, a combined nutraceutical, containing Bacopa monnieri dry extract 320 mg (bacosides 80 mg), L-theanine 100 mg, saffron 30 mg (crocin 1.5 mg), vitamin B6 9.5 mg, vitamin D 25 µg, copper 2 mg, biotin 450 µg, folic acid 400 µg, and vitamin B12 33 µg (INPHA Duemila Srl, Milano, Italy), 1 capsule per day, for 12 weeks. The following questionnaires were submitted at the baseline and at the end of the study: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) Index, and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SRDS). Participants were tested during a morning visit in a peaceful room by neuro-psychologically trained research assistants who were not directly involved in the study. Cognitive testing was evaluated by MMSE, a widely used screening tool for cognitive impairment that covers 5 areas of cognitive function (orientation, attention, calculus, recall and language), with a score ranging from 0 to 30. MMSE was adjusted by age and education. The value of 27 of the MMSE score has been typically considered the threshold of normal cognitive function [7]. Then, the PSQ Index [8] and SRDS [9] were administered to the same subjects at the beginning and at the end of the study, as well. Finally, participants had to complete the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale, which has become a validated tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19 [10]. Synaid tolerability was also tested at the end of the trial with a semi-quantitative scale. Throughout the study, we instructed patients to take the first dose of the new product the day after the study product’s delivery. At the same time, all unused products were retrieved for inventory. Product compliance was acquired by counting the number of the product’s doses returned at the time of specified clinic visits.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by intention to treat using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows. We compared characteristics and changes in questionnaire scores between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Normally distributed baseline characteristics of the population were compared using unpaired Student’s t test, non-normally distributed ones by Mann-Whitney-U test. Questionnaire scores were compared by Wilcoxon rank test. All data are shown as means and SD. A p level of < 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.

Results

At the baseline, the two patient groups were comparable in main clinical and laboratory parameters (Table I). Moreover, all participants were treated with ACE inhibitors/sartans and statins.
Table I

Main clinical and laboratory parameters of the enrolled patients

ParameterHospitalized (N = 19)Home-cared (N = 21)ParameterHospitalized (N = 19)Home-cared (N = 21)
Age [years]68.9 ±3.368.2 ±3.5Total cholesterol [mg/dl]237.8 ±21.7238.3 ±23.0
Waist circumference [cm]90.7 ±4.588.3 ±7.1HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]46.5 ±4.544.1 ±3.7
Body mass index [kg/m2]23.7 ±1.722.8 ±2.2LDL cholesterol [mg/dl]144.7 ±17.9151.4 ±16.5
Systolic blood pressure [mm Hg]137.3 ±4.8136.5 ±5.6Non-HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]191.4 ±20.7194.7 ±21.4
Diastolic blood pressure [mm Hg]88.7 ±3.287.6 ±5.2Triglycerides [mg/dl]235.4 ±23.7216.8 ±16.1
Serum uric acid [mg/dl]5.3 ±0.95.4 ±0.8gGT [mg/dl]34.3 ±4.432.9 ±4.5
Serum creatinine [mg/dl]0.7 ±0.30.7 ±0.4CPK [U/ml]141.3 ±31.3154.7 ±29.2
Main clinical and laboratory parameters of the enrolled patients Each enrolled subject completed the study. Two patients conveyed an unpleasant aftertaste after nutraceutical intake. Compliance to products was similar between patient groups: 96% in hospitalized patients, 92% in home-cared ones (p > 0.05). On a scale from 1 to 10, the mean acceptability was 9 for both groups. The main results of the trial are reported in Table II. MMSE, PSQ Index, SRDS and PCFS scale significantly improved in both patient groups.
Table II

Modification of the biometric test carried out on the volunteers in both treatment groups

ParameterHospitalized (N = 19)Home-cared (N = 21)
Pre-treatmentPost-treatmentPre-treatmentPost-treatment
MMSE24.1 ±1.024.9 ±0.7*23.9 ±0.925.0 ±0.9*
PSQ Index2.8 ±0.52.1 ±0.6*2.9 ±0.62.3 ±0.7*
SRDS43.9 ±5.536.2 ±4.9*44.5 ±5.337.8 ±5.7*
PCFS Scale3.2 ±0.42.8 ±0.4*3.1 ±0.32.7 ±0.2*

MMSE – Mini-Mental State Examination, PSQ – Perceived Stress Questionnaire, SRDS – Self-Rating Depression Scale, PCFS – Post-COVID-19 Functional Status.

P < 0.05 vs. baseline.

Modification of the biometric test carried out on the volunteers in both treatment groups MMSE – Mini-Mental State Examination, PSQ – Perceived Stress Questionnaire, SRDS – Self-Rating Depression Scale, PCFS – Post-COVID-19 Functional Status. P < 0.05 vs. baseline.

Discussion

The main limitations of the study are the small sample size and the relatively short-term observation. Therefore, the observed results should be confirmed in larger and long-term studies. In particular, since Synaid was never tested in this specific kind of patients it was not possible to estimate an adequate sample size. Anyway, the improvements observed are in line with those measured in our previous investigation on patients with known cognitive decline [6]. Moreover, the effects were also those expected considering the antioxidant, cholinesterase inhibition and serotonin-reuptake inhibition effects of the Synaid components [6, 11]. Then, we applied a limited number of tests. Further investigations may indicate that cognitive, anxiety or depression components are more significantly improved by the tested product. However, the improvement of the PCFS scale could be particularly interesting due to the increased worrying about the long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we did not measure the level of proinflammatory cytokines, which could have contributed to the post-COVID memory impairment [12]. However, we selected patients recovered from COVID with mild neurological symptoms where probably the residual systemic inflammation was not so relevant. In conclusion, the tested combined nutraceutical can significantly improve functional status, MMSE and the main psychological disorders associated with mild cognitive improvement versus baseline after Sars-Cov-2 infection, both in hospitalized patients and in home-cared patients, without side effects.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  12 in total

1.  A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE.

Authors:  W W ZUNG
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1965-01

2.  Short-Term Impact of a Combined Nutraceutical on Cognitive Function, Perceived Stress and Depression in Young Elderly with Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  A F Cicero; M Bove; A Colletti; M Rizzo; F Fogacci; M Giovannini; C Borghi
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017

Review 3.  Botanicals and phytochemicals active on cognitive decline: The clinical evidence.

Authors:  Arrigo F G Cicero; Federica Fogacci; Maciej Banach
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 7.658

4.  The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples.

Authors:  Herbert Fliege; Matthias Rose; Petra Arck; Otto B Walter; Rueya-Daniela Kocalevent; Cora Weber; Burghard F Klapp
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level.

Authors:  R M Crum; J C Anthony; S S Bassett; M F Folstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A brewing storm: The neuropsychological sequelae of hyperinflammation due to COVID-19.

Authors:  Thomas P Cothran; Suzanne Kellman; Shifali Singh; Jonathan S Beck; Karina J Powell; Corey J Bolton; Joyce W Tam
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 7.  Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease.

Authors:  Michael T Heneka; Douglas Golenbock; Eicke Latz; Dave Morgan; Robert Brown
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.982

8.  The battle against COVID-19: mortality in Italy.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; Aldo P Maggioni; Luigi Tavazzi; Claudio Rapezzi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  The landscape of cognitive function in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Hetong Zhou; Shaojia Lu; Jingkai Chen; Ning Wei; Dandan Wang; Hailong Lyu; Chuan Shi; Shaohua Hu
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19.

Authors:  Frederikus A Klok; Gudula J A M Boon; Stefano Barco; Matthias Endres; J J Miranda Geelhoed; Samuel Knauss; Spencer A Rezek; Martijn A Spruit; Jörg Vehreschild; Bob Siegerink
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is cognitive ability a factor in explaining differences in physiological and psychological stress responses?

Authors:  Burcu Koksal
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.