| Literature DB >> 34899888 |
Tianwang Lei1, Yao Lu1, Chong Zhang2, Jing Wang1, Qi Zhou2.
Abstract
With the rapid development of the economy and society, geological disasters such as landslides, collapses, and mudslides have shown an intensifying trend, seriously endangering the safety of people's lives and property, and affecting the sustainable development of the economy and society. Aiming at the problems of merging different data layers and determining the weighting of data stacking in the statistical analysis model based on GIS technology in the evaluation of the risk of geological disasters, this study proposes a logistic regression model combined with the RBFNN-GA algorithm, that is, the determination of the occurrence of geological disasters. The fusion coefficient (CF value) with the RBFNN-GA algorithm model, and with the help of SPSS statistical analysis software, solves the problem of factor selection, heterogeneous data merging, and weighting of each data layer in the risk assessment. In the experimental stage, this study adopts the method of geological hazard certainty coefficients to carry out the sensitivity analysis of the geological hazards in the study area. Using homogeneous grid division, the spatial quantitative evaluation of the risk of geological disasters is realized, and at the same time, the results of the spatial quantitative evaluation of the risk of geological disasters are tested according to the latest landslide points in the region. The existing classification mainly depends on the acquisition of land use/cover information or the processing method of the acquired information, but the existing information acquisition will be limited by time, space, and spectral resolution. The results show that the number of landslide points per unit area in the extremely unstable zone and the unstable zone is 0.0395 points/km2 and 0.0251 points/km2, respectively, which is much higher than 0.0038 points/km2 in the stable zone, indicating the evaluation results and actual landslide conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899888 PMCID: PMC8660228 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2677453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Hierarchical topology of GIS technology.
Figure 2Fan-shaped diagrams of geological hazard factors.
Figure 3RBFNN-GA algorithm architecture.
Figure 4Quantitative histogram of the susceptibility of geological disasters.
Figure 5RBFNN network evaluation index normalized comparison line chart.
Figure 6TheGIS system geological hazard influence curvature distribution.
Normalized processing of GIS disaster indicators
| Indicator index | Raster calculator | Weight | Curvature (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Landslides | 0.32 | 13.5 |
| 2 | Collapses | 0.17 | 22.1 |
| 3 | Slopes | 0.42 | 31.2 |
| 4 | Mudslides | 0.09 | 26.4 |
| 5 | Cracks | 0.11 | 19.6 |
Figure 7Gray value interpolation of output pixel fitting.
Figure 8The standard deviation line chart of the RBFNN network band.