| Literature DB >> 34899851 |
Jiayi Wan1,2,3,4, Mingyang Hu1,2,3,4, Ziming Jiang1,2,3,4, Dongwei Liu1,2,3,4, Shaokang Pan1,2,3,4, Sijie Zhou1,2,3,4, Zhangsuo Liu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy is considered one of the most common microvascular complications of diabetes and the pathophysiology involves multiple factors. Progressive diabetic nephropathy is believed to be related to the structure and function of the tubular epithelial cells in the kidney. However, the role of lysine acetylation in lesions of the renal tubular epithelial cells arising from hyperglycemia is poorly understood. Consequently, in this study, we cultured mouse renal tubular epithelial cells in vitro under high glucose conditions and analyzed the acetylation levels of proteins by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. We identified 48 upregulated proteins and downregulated 86 proteins. In addition, we identified 113 sites with higher acetylation levels and 374 sites with lower acetylation levels. Subcellular localization analysis showed that the majority of the acetylated proteins were located in the mitochondria (43.17%), nucleus (28.57%) and cytoplasm (16.19%). Enrichment analysis indicated that these acetylated proteins are primarily associated with oxidative phosphorylation, the citrate cycle (TCA cycle), metabolic pathways and carbon metabolism. In addition, we used the MCODE plug-in and the cytoHubba plug-in in Cytoscape software to analyze the PPI network and displayed the first four most compact MOCDEs and the top 10 hub genes from the differentially expressed proteins between global and acetylated proteomes. Finally, we extracted 37 conserved motifs from 4915 acetylated peptides. Collectively, this comprehensive analysis of the proteome reveals novel insights into the role of lysine acetylation in tubular epithelial cells and may make a valuable contribution towards the identification of the pathological mechanisms of diabetic nephropathy.Entities:
Keywords: acetyltransferase; diabetic nephropathy; lysine acetylation; proteome; renal tubular epithelial cells
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899851 PMCID: PMC8657754 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.767135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Analysis of the global proteome and acetylated proteome. (A) Western blotting of proteins in TKPT cells with anti-lysine acetylation antibodies. The two lanes represent NG (normal glucose: 5.6 mM) and HG (high glucose: 40 mM) conditions. Short exposure and long exposure, respectively. (B) The distribution of acetylated proteins based on the number of acetylation sites. (C) The global proteome was searched and analyzed in a MS/MS mass spectrometry database. (D) The acetylated proteome was searched and analyzed in a MS/MS mass spectrometry database.
FIGURE 2The differential analysis and subcellular localization of global proteome and acetylated proteome. (A) Volcano map of differentially expressed proteins in global proteome. (B) Volcano map of differentially expressed proteins in acetylated proteome. (C) Histograms showing differentially expressed proteins in global proteome. (D) Histograms showing differentially expressed acetylated proteins. (E) Venn diagrams showing differentially expressed proteins in global proteome and acetylated proteome. (F) Rose plots showing the subcellular localization of differentially expressed proteins in global proteome. (G) Rose plots showing the subcellular localization of differentially expressed acetylated proteins.
FIGURE 3Gene ontology (GO) functional classification of differentially expressed proteins between the global proteome and acetylated proteome. (A) GO enrichment analysis bubble diagram for the global proteome. (B) GO enrichment analysis bar diagram for the acetylated proteome.
FIGURE 4Protein domain and KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins in global proteome and acetylated proteome. (A) Domain enrichment analysis of the global proteome. (B) Domain enrichment of the acetylated proteome. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the global proteome. (D) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the acetylated proteome. (E) Network map of specific KEGG pathways in the global proteome. (F) Network map of specific KEGG pathways in the acetylated proteome.
FIGURE 5Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of differentially expressed proteins in global proteome and acetylated proteome. (A) STRING and Cytoscape software were used to create a PPI network for the global proteome. (B) Four modules of the global proteome. The four modules are based on the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm; “Degree Cutoff” was set to “4”. (C) STRING and Cytoscape software were used to create a PPI network for the acetylated proteome. (D) Four modules of the acetylated proteome. The four modules are based on the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm; “Degree Cutoff” was set to “4.”
FIGURE 6Properties of the acetylated peptides. (A) Distribution of acetylated proteins based on the numbers of acetylation sites. (B) Sequence probabilities of significantly enriched acetylation site motifs with 10 amino acids around the lysine acetylation site. (C) Heat map showing acetylation motif enrichment. (D) Secondary structure distribution of lysine acetylation sites. (E) Surface predictive accessibility of acetylation sites.
FIGURE 7The apoptosis signaling pathway and P53 signaling pathway in the renal tubular epithelial cells under high glucose conditions. Purple represents proteins with lower levels of acetylation, red represents proteins with higher levels of acetylation, and yellow represents proteins with no significant difference in acetylation levels.