| Literature DB >> 34899745 |
Thais Cristina Tirado1, Larine Lowry Moura1, Patrícia Shigunov2, Fabiano Borges Figueiredo1.
Abstract
Background: Trypanosomatids are protozoa responsible for a wide range of diseases, with emphasis on Chagas Disease (CD) and Leishmaniasis, which are in the list of most relevant Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) according to World Health Organization (WHO). During the infectious process, immune system is immediately activated, and parasites can invade nucleated cells through a broad diversity of receptors. The complement system - through classical, alternative and lectin pathways - plays a role in the first line of defense against these pathogens, acting in opsonization, phagocytosis and lysis of parasites. Genetic modifications in complement genes, such as Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), can influence host susceptibility to these parasites and modulate protein expression.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas Disease; complement system; expression levels; leishmaniasis; polymorphism; susceptibility; systematic review; trypanosomatids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899745 PMCID: PMC8656155 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.780810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Index terms used in the literature search conducted at the PubMed and Google Scholar databases (top) and inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to select the studies (bottom).
| Index Terms | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Conditions used to evaluate the studies included in this review.
|
Study on the genetic variants and expression levels of complement genes in conditions caused by trypanosomatids; Assessment of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in the sample; Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) in SNPs; Evaluation of more than one complement pathway; Evaluation of the entire CoDing Sequence (CDS) region and gene regulation; Randomization and inclusion of gender and ethnicity diversity in experimental groups; Sample size determination; Demonstration of suitable diagnosis methodology; Sample suitability for testing; Use of appropriate control groups; Application of adequate and up-to-date techniques. | |||||||||
Figure 1Flowchart summarizing the process used to select the papers for this systematic review in three steps: identification, screening, and inclusion.
Main characteristics of the studies included in this systematic review upon topic, target, methodology and conclusion aspects.
| Reference | Main topic | Disease | Location | Control sample size | Patient sample size | Genes | Target* | Genetic variants analysis tools* | Expression levels analysis tools* | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) | India | 225 | 218 |
| Promoter; Exon 8 | Sequencing (Sanger) | ELISA | Genetic variants were associated with VL patients. |
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) | India | 215 | 218 |
| Promoter | Sequencing (Sanger) | ELISA |
|
| Sandri et al., 2019 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 108 | 251 |
| Exon 7 | Sequencing (Sanger) | ELISA | Genetic variants were associated with CD patients; |
| Assaf et al., 2012 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) | Syria | 286 | 226 |
| Promoter; Exon 8 | Promoter: TaqMan Real-Time PCR | ELISA | Genetic variants were associated with CL patients; |
| Messias-Reason et al., 2003 ( | Genetic variants (allotypes) | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 100 | 100 |
|
| HVAGE | NA |
|
| Boldt et al., 2011 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 300 | 208 |
| Exons 3, 8, 10, 12 | PCR-SSPs | ELISA | Genetic variants were associated with CD patients; |
| Luz et al., 2016 ( | Genetic variants | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 202 | 196 |
| Promoter; Exon 1 | Sequencing (Sanger) | NA | Genetic variants may be associated with CD |
| Sandri et al., 2018 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 104 | 232 |
| Exon 29 | Sequencing (Sanger) | ELISA | Genetic variants were associated with CD patients; |
| Luz et al., 2013 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Chagas Disease (CD) | Brazil | 305 | 243 |
| Promoter; Exon 8 | Patients: FRET based Real-Time PCR; PCR-SSPs | ELISA | Patients presented lower FCN2 plasma levels than controls; individuals with moderate forms had higher FCN2 levels than the severe forms. |
| Alonso et al., 2007 ( | Genetic variants and expression levels | Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) | Brazil | 76 | 159 (69 = symptomatic; |
| Promoter; Exon 1 | SNaPshot Multiplex kit | Double-antibody immune assay | Genetic variants were associated with VL patients; |
| Weitzel et al., 2012 ( | Genetic variants | Chagas Disease (CD) | Chile | 45 | 125 (64 = symptomatic; |
| Promoter; | RFLP | NA | Low-producer |
| Asgharzadeh | Genetic variants | Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) | Iran | 120 | 58 |
|
| PCR-SSPs | NA | High-producer MBL2*A genotypes are more common in VL patients. |
*WT, Wild-Type; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; SSP, Sequence-Specific Primers; FRET, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer; HVAGE, High-Voltage Agarose Gel Elecrophoresis; RFLP, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism; ELISA, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; NA, Not Applicable.
Evaluation of the studies included in this systematic review.
| Reference | Criterion number | Final Score (_/11) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 9 |
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 9 |
| Sandri et al., 2019 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8.5 |
| Assaf et al., 2012 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 |
| Messias-Reason et al., 2003 ( | 0.5 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 8 |
| Boldt et al., 2011 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 7.5 |
| Luz et al., 2016 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 7.5 |
| Sandri et al., 2018 ( | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 7.5 |
| Luz et al., 2013 ( | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 6.5 |
| Alonso et al., 2007 ( | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 6 |
| Weitzel et al., 2012 ( | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 5.5 |
| Asgharzadeh et al., 2007 ( | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 5 |
Captions: 1 – 11: criterion number according to and as described in the Methodology section. Scores: 0 = study in full disagreement with the criteria; 0.5 = study in partial agreement with the criteria; 1 = study in full agreement with the criteria; NA, not applicable (score = 1).
Figure 2Susceptibility profile for CD (A) and VL (B) according to serum protein expression levels reported in the articles included in this systematic review. (A) CD patients (red) and healthy individuals (dark blue) serum levels were measured by ELISA assay. (B) VL patients (green) and healthy individuals (dark blue) serum levels were measured by ELISA assay. The arrows indicate the increase (↑) or decrease (↓) protein level in the serum of patients compared to the healthy control group.
Main gene and protein alterations associated with disease progression found by articles included in this systematic review.
| Reference | Gene | Target | Genetic variants associated with disease | Protein levels associated with disease | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutation/Haplotype* | NCBI rsSNP | Amino acid change | ||||
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( |
| Exon 8 | +6359C>T | rs17549193T | T236M | High |
| Mishra et al., 2015 ( |
| Promoter | − | − | − | High |
| − | − | − | ||||
| Sandri et al., 2019 ( |
| Exon 7 | +39617A>G | rs7567833G | − | Low |
| +39617AG | rs7567833AG | |||||
| +39617GG | rs7567833GG | − | ||||
| GGCG | − | − | ||||
| Assaf et al., 2012 ( |
| Promoter, Exon 1-8 |
| − | − | − |
| Exon 8 | − | − | − | |||
| Messias-Reason et al., 2003 ( |
| Exon 3 | +40495G>A,C,T | rs2230199 | A80G | − |
| Boldt et al., 2011 ( |
| Promoter, Exon 3, |
| − | − | High |
| Luz et al., 2016 ( |
| Exon 1 | − | − | − | − |
| Sandri et al., 2018 ( |
| Exon 29 | +113244A>G | rs17047660G | Low | |
| +113277A>G | rs17047661G | − | ||||
| +113319A>G | rs6691117G | |||||
| +113277AG | rs17047661AG | |||||
| +113277GG | rs17047661GG | |||||
| +113319AG | rs6691117AG | |||||
| +113319GG | rs6691117GG | − | ||||
|
| − | − | ||||
| Luz et al., 2013 ( |
| Promoter, | -4A>G | rs17514136G | − | Low |
| Éxon 8 | +6424G>T | rs7851696T | A258S | |||
| Alonso et al., 2007 ( |
| Promoter, Exon 1 | − | − | − | High |
| Weitzel et al., 2012 ( |
| Exon 1 | +3339C>T ( | rs1800450 | G54D | − |
| Asgharzadeh et al., 2007 ( |
| Exon 1 |
| − | − | − |
*WT, Wild-Type.