| Literature DB >> 34899501 |
Abstract
Place attachment has been identified as effective marketing strength to enhance destination competitiveness. However, little research explored the formation mechanism of the place attachment of potential tourists and the role of celebrity endorsers. This study aims to identify the influence mechanism of the credibility of endorsers on place attachment. Various theories from different research fields were introduced to explore the mediating effect of destination attitude, para-social relationships, and destination source credibility between endorser credibility and the place attachment of potential tourists. The famous destination endorser in China, Tenzin, was chosen as the case. A quantitative method was adopted. The research model was examined by a survey sampling size of 367 respondents. The covariance-based structural equation model analysis revealed that the credibility of the endorser exerts a positive influence on the destination attitude of potential tourists, para-social relationship with the endorser, and destination source credibility. These three constructs have a positive effect on their place attachment. The results showed that the credibility of the endorser has a significant indirect influence on place attachment. This study extends the current literature of forming the place attachment of potential tourists from the perspective of the personal characteristics of the destination endorser. The findings shed light on how the credibility of the endorser could form place attachment through enhancing the destination attitude, credibility, and para-social relationships of potential tourists. This study provides several practical implications for destination marketing.Entities:
Keywords: destination attitude; destination source credibility; endorser credibility; para-social relationship; place attachment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899501 PMCID: PMC8661452 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1CE = destination endorser credibility; DA = destination attitude; PSR = para-social relationship; DSC = destination source credibility; PA = place attachment.
Sample profile.
| Variable | Frequency ( | % | |
| Gender | Female | 202 | 55 |
| Male | 165 | 45 | |
| Marital Status | Married | 125 | 34.1 |
| Other | 242 | 65.9 | |
| Age | 18–25 | 127 | 34.6 |
| 26–35 | 148 | 40.3 | |
| 36–45 | 79 | 21.5 | |
| 46–55 | 9 | 2.5 | |
| 56 or above | 4 | 1.1 | |
| Education | High school or below | 48 | 13.1 |
| Undergraduates | 235 | 64.1 | |
| Graduates or above | 84 | 22.8 | |
| Occupation | Working | 140 | 38.2 |
| Student | 140 | 38.2 | |
| Housewife | 21 | 5.7 | |
| Retired | 3 | 0.8 | |
| Others | 63 | 17.1 |
Reliability, convergent validity, and normality assessment.
| Items | Factor loadings | Cronbach’s alpha | CR | AVE | skewness | kurtosis |
|
| ||||||
| I feel Tenzin was honest | 0.930 | 0.969 | 0.969 | 0.887 | –0.772 | 0.708 |
| I consider Tenzin trustworthy | 0.945 | –0.693 | 0.474 | |||
| I feel Tenzin was truthful | 0.952 | –0.718 | 0.441 | |||
| I consider Tenzin earnest | 0.940 | –0.820 | 0.618 | |||
|
| ||||||
| I consider Tenzin very attractive | 0.933 | 0.958 | 0.958 | 0.852 | –0.321 | –0.405 |
| I consider Tenzin very stylish | 0.910 | –0.119 | –0.581 | |||
| I think Tenzin is good looking | 0.909 | –0.301 | –0.590 | |||
| I think Tenzin is sexy | 0.940 | –0.280 | –0.646 | |||
|
| ||||||
| I feel Tenzin knows a lot about the travel destination | 0.828 | 0.938 | 0.939 | 0.795 | –0.471 | 0.077 |
| I feel Tenzin is competent to make assertions about the travel destination | 0.917 | –0.228 | –0.275 | |||
| I consider Tenzin an expert on the travel destination | 0.903 | –0.118 | –0.111 | |||
| I consider Tenzin sufficiently experienced to make assertions about the travel destination | 0.915 | –0.353 | –0.177 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Attitude toward the destination: | ||||||
| Very bad- very good | 0.940 | 0.918 | 0.923 | 0.802 | –0.360 | –0.109 |
| Very unfavorable – very favorable | 0.950 | –0.359 | –0.164 | |||
| Very negative – very positive | 0.787 | –0.601 | 0.448 | |||
|
| ||||||
| I look forward to watching Tenzin on his channel | 0.875 | 0.968 | 0.969 | 0.794 | –0.315 | –0.475 |
| If Tenzin appeared on another program, I would watch that video | 0.894 | –0.102 | –0.658 | |||
| When I’m watching Tenzin, I feel as if I am part of his group | 0.913 | –0.045 | –0.793 | |||
| I think Tenzin is like an old friend | 0.910 | 0.094 | –0.631 | |||
| I would like to meet Tenzin in person | 0.899 | 0.094 | –0.792 | |||
| If there were a story about Tenzin in a newspaper or magazine, I would read it | 0.879 | –0.320 | –0.532 | |||
| Tenzin makes me feel comfortable as if I am with friends | 0.924 | –0.152 | –0.654 | |||
| When Tenzin shows me how he feels about the destination, it helps me make up my own mind about the destination | 0.830 | –0.584 | –0.235 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Information claims from the destination are believable. | 0.934 | 0.975 | 0.975 | 0.886 | –0.370 | 0.031 |
| The destination is committed to delivering on its claims. | 0.931 | –0.530 | 0.044 | |||
| The destination has a name you can trust. | 0.950 | –0.359 | –0.134 | |||
| The destination has the ability to deliver what it promises. | 0.948 | –0.424 | –0.026 | |||
| The destination would deliver what it promises. | 0.944 | –0.410 | –0.085 | |||
|
| ||||||
| I am very attached to the destination | 0.830 | 0.927 | 0.932 | 0.821 | –0.058 | –0.215 |
| This place is very special to me. | 0.943 | –0.110 | –0.555 | |||
| The place means a great deal to me. | 0.940 | 0.067 | –0.403 | |||
|
| ||||||
| I wouldn’t substitute any other place for the type of experience I can have in the destination | 0.905 | 0.971 | 0.972 | 0.896 | –0.142 | –0.545 |
| I enjoy visiting the destination more than any other place | 0.960 | –0.070 | –0.472 | |||
| Visiting the destination is more important than visiting any other place | 0.964 | –0.037 | –0.621 | |||
| I can get more satisfaction out of visiting the destination than from visiting any other place | 0.956 | –0.097 | –0.517 | |||
Fornell-Larcker criterion.
| CE-TR | CE-AT | CE-EX | DA | PSR | DSC | PA-PI | PA-PD | |
| CE-TR | 0.942 | |||||||
| CE-AT | 0.748 | 0.923 | ||||||
| CE-EX | 0.661 | 0.714 | 0.892 | |||||
| DA | 0.723 | 0.643 | 0.646 | 0.896 | ||||
| PSR | 0.712 | 0.797 | 0.710 | 0.614 | 0.891 | |||
| DSC | 0.709 | 0.692 | 0.694 | 0.726 | 0.762 | 0.941 | ||
| PA-PI | 0.584 | 0.669 | 0.670 | 0.621 | 0.760 | 0.688 | 0.906 | |
| PA-PD | 0.601 | 0.677 | 0.671 | 0.616 | 0.795 | 0.743 | 0.769 | 0.947 |
CE-TR = credibility – trustworthiness; CE-AT = credibility – attractiveness; CE-EX = credibility – expertise; DA = destination attitude; PSR = para-social relationship; DSC = destination source credibility; PA-PI = place attachment - place identity; PA-PD = place attachment - place dependence.
Hypotheses test.
| Hypotheses | β |
| |||
| Endorser credibility | ⇒ | Destination attitude | 0.785 | 15.918 | < 0.001 |
| Endorser credibility | ⇒ | Para-social relationship | 0.871 | 17.364 | < 0.001 |
| Endorser credibility | ⇒ | Destination source credibility | 0.853 | 18.023 | < 0.001 |
| Destination attitude | ⇒ | Place attachment | 0.139 | 2.938 | < 0.01 |
| Para-social relationship | ⇒ | Place attachment | 0.602 | 10.874 | < 0.001 |
| Destination source credibility | ⇒ | Place attachment | 0.262 | 4.576 | < 0.001 |