| Literature DB >> 34899404 |
Jing Song Wang1, Jing Lin Liu1, Jun Zhang2, Jun Tan3, Ting Huang1, Chun Xia Lu1, Xi Yang Peng1, Yin Guo1, Lan Zheng1.
Abstract
Purpose: This study explored the association between peripheral blood oxytocin (OT) and social anxiety disorder (SAD) and cue-induced cravings in female heroin addicts. The effect of exercise on alleviation of SAD and OT levels was also explored.Entities:
Keywords: DDQ; SAD; VAS; craving; exercise; oxytocin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899404 PMCID: PMC8663167 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.624993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1A flowchart of the participant screening process.
Demographic characteristics of heroin addicts.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | 40.26 ± 4.86 | 38.36 ± 5.69 | 39.55 ± 5.55 | |
| Height (cm) | 160.21 ± 4.53 | 160.82 ± 4.69 | 159.32 ± 5.15 | |
| Weight (kg) | 58.93 ± 6.11 | 59.93 ± 6.81 | 56.35 ± 5.15 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.71 ± 5.01 | 22.19 ± 1.60 | 23.21 ± 2.90 | |
| Waist (cm) | 81.89 ± 6.70 | 82.50 ± 8.38 | 77.64 ± 4.35 | |
| Culture | Primary school or less | 4 (21.1) | 3 (13.6) | 3 (13.6) |
| Junior high school | 7 (36.8) | 9 (40.9) | 13 (59.1) | |
| Senior middle school | 5 (26.3) | 5 (22.7) | 6 (27.2) | |
| College or above | 3 (15.8) | 5 (22.7) | 0 (0) | |
| Occupation | Unemployed | 2 (10.5) | 10 (45.5) | 15 (68.2) |
| Self-employed | 4 (21.1) | 7 (31.8) | 3 (13.6) | |
| Service | 5 (26.3) | 2 (9.1) | 2 (9.1) | |
| Manual worker | 4 (21.1) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.5) | |
| General staff | 4 (21.1) | 2 (9.1) | 1 (4.5) | |
| Marital status | Married | 10 (52.6) | 4 (18.2) | 2 (9.1) |
| Single | 8 (42.1) | 15 (68.2) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Widowed | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.5) | |
| Divorced | 1 (5.3) | 3 (13.6) | 9 (40.9) | |
| Regions | Urban | 12 (63.2) | 10 (45.5) | 10 (45.5) |
| Rural | 7 (36.8) | 12 (54.5) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Drug data | ||||
| Heroin use at one time (g) | 0.52 ± 0.33 | 0.56 ± 0.33 | 0.45 ± 0.23 | |
| Times per month | 20.46 ± 10.42 | 19.68 ± 11.52 | 21.25 ± 10.68 | |
| Duration (months) | 116.41 ± 61.54 | 116.71 ± 64.35 | 12.34 ± 71.66 | |
| Relapse times | 1.15 ± 0.57 | 1.58 ± 0.71 | 2.16 ± 1.17 | |
The effect of exercise on LSAS score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-SAD control | 22.11 ± 2.87 | 21.58 ± 3.31 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| SAD control | 70.45 ± 7.44 | 69.00 ± 7.00 | |||
| SAD exercise | 71.59 ± 6.41 | 44.86 ± 12.02 |
p < 0.01, compared with the Non-SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with the SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with pre-exercise.
The effect of exercise on VAS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-SAD control | 24.47 ± 8.02 | 24.47 ± 9.31 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| SAD control | 41.72 ± 14.35 | 39.55 ± 11.49 | |||
| SAD exercise | 37.91 ± 13.19 | 25.59 ± 9.36 |
p < 0.01, compared with the Non-SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with the SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with pre-exercise.
The effect of exercise on DDQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desire and Intention | Non-SAD control | 3.79 ± 0.92 | 3.95 ± 0.98 | 0.604 | <0.05 | <0.01 |
| SAD control | 4.19 ± 1.24 | 4.07 ± 0.93 | ||||
| SAD exercise | 4.34 ± 1.02 | 3.52 ± 0.91 | ||||
| Negative reinforcement | Non-SAD | 4.39 ± 0.96 | 4.20 ± 1.10 | 0.063 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
| SAD control | 4.21 ± 1.09 | 4.21 ± 0.91 | ||||
| SAD exercise | 4.23 ± 0.93 | 3.41 ± 0.79 | ||||
| Control | Non-SAD control | 3.63 ± 1.56 | 3.71 ± 1.18 | 0.228 | 0.276 | 0.958 |
| SAD control | 2.97 ± 1.49 | 3.14 ± 1.26 | ||||
| SAD exercise | 3.02 ± 1.29 | 3.16 ± 1.15 |
p < 0.01, compared with the Non-SAD control group;
p < 0.05, compared with the SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with pre-exercise.
The effect of exercise on plasma OT levels (pg/ml).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-SAD control | 60.74 ± 3.91 | 58.93 ± 3.94 | <0.001 | 0.332 | <0.001 |
| SAD control | 55.58 ± 5.35 | 54.01 ± 6.40 | |||
| SAD exercise | 56.80 ± 4.62 | 62.61 ± 5.86 |
p < 0.05, compared with the Non-SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with the Non-SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with the SAD control group;
p < 0.01, compared with pre-exercise.
Figure 2Correlation analysis of plasma OT levels and the LSAS, VAS, and DDQ scores. Interpretation of r-value: 0 = no relationship; 0.01–0.19 = no/negligible relationship; 0.20–0.29 = weak positive correlation; 0.30–0.39 = moderate positive correlation; 0.40–0.69 = strong positive correlation; 0.70 or higher = very strong relationship. (A) LSAS, Liebowitz social anxiety disorder scale; (B) VAS, Visual Analog Scale; (C) Desire and Intention, desire for heroin; (D) Negative reinforcement, repeated use of heroin to relieve withdrawal symptoms; (E) Control, the ability to control heroin.
Figure 3Correlation analysis results of LSAS and the VAS, as well as DDQ scores. Interpretation of r-value: 0 = no relationship; 0.01–0.19 = no/negligible relationship; 0.20–0.29 = weak positive correlation; 0.30–0.39 = moderate positive correlation; 0.40–0.69 = strong positive correlation; 0.70 or higher = very strong relationship. (A) VAS, Visual Analog Scale; (B) Desire and Intention, desire for heroin; (C) Negative reinforcement, repeated use of heroin to relieve withdrawal symptoms; (D) Control, the ability to control heroin.