| Literature DB >> 34899289 |
Qian-Hui Zhang1, Hao-Zhou Huang1, Min Qiu1, Zhen-Feng Wu2, Zhan-Chang Xin3, Xin-Fu Cai4,5, Qiang Shang4,5, Jun-Zhi Lin6, Ding-Kun Zhang1, Li Han1.
Abstract
The current Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a global challenge, and although vaccines have been developed, it is expected that mild to moderate patients will control their symptoms, especially in developing countries. Licorice, not only a food additive, but also a common traditional Chinese herbal medicine, which has several pharmacological effects, such as anti-inflammation, detoxification, antibacterial, antitussive, and immunomodulatory effects, especially in respiratory diseases. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, glycyrrhizin, glycyrrhizin diamine and glycyrrhizin extract have been widely studied and used in COVID-19 clinical trials. Therefore, it is a very interesting topic to explore the material basis, pharmacological characteristics and molecular mechanism of licorice in adjuvant treatment of COVID-19. In this paper, the material basis of licorice for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is deeply analyzed, and there are significant differences among different components in different pharmacological mechanisms. Glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetinic acid inhibit the synthesis of inflammatory factors and inflammatory mediators by blocking the binding of ACE 2 to virus spike protein, and exert antiviral and antibacterial effects. Immune cells are stimulated by multiple targets and pathways to interfere with the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Liquiritin can prevent and cure COVID-19 by simulating type I interferon. It is suggested that licorice can exert its therapeutic advantage through multi-components and multi-targets. To sum up, licorice has the potential to adjuvant prevent and treat COVID-19. It not only plays a significant role in anti-inflammation and anti-ACE-2, but also significantly improves the clinical symptoms of fever, dry cough and shortness of breath, suggesting that licorice is expected to be a candidate drug for adjuvant treatment of patients with early / mild COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; licorice; mechanism of action; pharmacological effects; traditional uses
Year: 2021 PMID: 34899289 PMCID: PMC8661450 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.719758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
The potential components of licorice.
| Number | Component | Molecular formula | Pharmacological activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glycyrrhizin | C42H62O16 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, immunomodulatory, anti-pulmonary fibrosis, and inhibition of ACE2 |
|
| 2 | Liquiritin | C21H22O9 | Antiviral, immunomodulatory |
|
| 3 | Isoliquiritin | C21H22O9 | Anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory |
|
| 4 | Liquiritigenin | C15H12O4 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, immunomodulatory |
|
| 5 | Isoliquiritigenin | C15H12O4 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial |
|
| 6 | Neoisoliquiritin | C21H22O9 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 7 | Licoflavonol | C20H18O6 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 8 | Isolicoflavonol | C20H18O6 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 9 | Licochalcone A | C21H22O4 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, immunomodulatory |
|
| 10 | Licochalcone B | C16H14O5 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, immunomodulatory |
|
| 11 | Licochalcone C | C21H22O4 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, immunomodulatory |
|
| 12 | Licochalcone D | C21H22O5 | Anti-inflammatory, antiviral, immunomodulatory |
|
| 13 | Licoricone | C22H22O6 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 14 | Glabridin | C20H20O4 | Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, vascular protection |
|
| 15 | Glabrene | C20H20O4 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 16 | Glabranin | C20H20O4 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 17 | Uralenin | C20H18O6 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 18 | Licocoumarin A | C25H26O5 | Anti-inflammatory |
|
| 19 | Kanzonol R | C22H26O5 | Antiviral |
|
FIGURE 1Structural formula of potential components of licorice.
FIGURE 2The process of SARS-CoV2 virus infection of host cells. Note: The replication cycle of SARS-CoV2 in virus-susceptible host cells: (1) ACE2 binds to the RBD of the spike protein (S) and then fuses with the host cell membrane. (2) Release the positive single-stranded RNA. (3, 4) Partially translate into SARS-CoV2 polymerase protein. (5) Transcribe. (6) The resulting subgenomic RNA translated S, M, and E proteins are transported to the ER membrane of the host cell and then bind to the nucleocapsid protein (N). (7) To-after processing in the Golgi apparatus. (8) Mature virus particles are formed and transported to the cell membrane. (10) New SARS-CoV2 particles are excreted by exocytosis (9).
FIGURE 3Anti-inflammatory mechanism of licorice.
FIGURE 4Interaction between SARS-CoV2 and ACE2 under the action of licorice.
Antiviral active components and their possible mechanism of virus prevention.
| Component | Antiviral mechanism | Virus type | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glycyrrhizin | Blocking I | CVB3 |
|
| Activating T lymphocyte proliferation | DHV |
| |
| Cutting adhesion force and stress between PMN and CCEC. | HSV |
| |
| Reducing H5N1-induced production of CCL5, IL-6, and restraining H5N1-induced apoptosis | H5N1 |
| |
| Deactivating CVA16, inhibiting the virus to exertanti-EV-71 effect | CVA16, EV71 |
| |
| Stimulating IFN secretion, inhibiting virus attachment, and internalization | HRSV |
|
Antibacterial and antifungal mechanism of licorice.
| Component | Antibacterial/antifungal mechanism | Type of microorganism | The range of the concentrations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycyrrhizin | Reducing the expression of key genes |
| MIC: 62.5 μg/ml |
|
| Inhibiting pathogenic bacteria and reducing the bacterial gene expression | MIC: 4–8 mg/ml | |||
| licochalcone A and glabridin | Restraining biofilm formation and preventing yeast-hyphal transition |
| MIC: 6.25–12.5 μg/ml |
|
| licochalcone E | Reducing the production of |
| — |
|
| Liquiritigenin | Decreasing the production of |
| MIC: 512 μg/ml |
|
| glycyrrhizin and its derivatives | Inhibiting nutrient acquisition and affecting bacterial metabolism |
| Above MIC: 128 mg/L |
|
| isoliquiritigenin and liquiritigenin | Reducing the production of bacterial toxins |
| MIC: 50–100 μg/ml |
|
| licochalcone A | Inhibiting fungal activity especially in the glyoxylate cycle |
| MIC: 11.52 μg/ml |
|
| isobavachalcone, 4-hydroxycarotene, and kanzonol C | Inhibiting at various extents the reverse transcriptase activity |
| MIC <10 μg/ml |
|
| licochalcone E | Reducing the production of α-toxin |
| MIC: 0.3 mg/ml |
|
| Glabridin | Guiding fractionation against selected fungal strains |
| MIC: 31.25–250 mg/ml |
|
Clinical studies on the potential treatment of COVID-19 with licorice.
| Medicine | Subject | Study design | Length | Treatment result | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abidol combined with Glycyrrhizin Diamine Enteric-coated Capsules | 46 patients with COVID-19 (15 males and 31 females) | Randomized, Control group | — | Compared with that before treatment, the symptoms of patients were significantly improved after treatment ( |
|
| Diammonium Glycyrrhizinate | 104 novel coronavirus pneumonia patients (60 males and 45 females) | Randomized, Control and observation group | 2 weeks | The cure rate, markedly effective rate and total effective rate of the observation group were 19.23, 28.85 and 61.54% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the control group (7.69, 17.31 and 40.38%) ( |
|
| Diammonium Glycyrrhizinate | Vero cells | — | 72–96 h | Expression of viral antigens was much lower in cultures treated with 1,000 mg/L of glycyrhizin than in any other culture; high concentrations of glycyrthizin (4,000 mg/L) completely blocked replication of the virus |
|
| Lianhuaqingwen capsule | 284 patients (142 each in treatment and control group) | Randomized, Control and observation group | 14 days | The recovery rate was significantly higher in treatment group as compared with control group (91.5 vs. 82.4%, |
|
| Lianhuaqingwen capsule | 42 patients (21 subjects in the treatment group and 21 subjects in the control group) | Randomized, Control and observation group | — | Compared with the control group, patients in the treatment group had the higher clinical effect, including the disappearance rate of fever (85.7 vs. 57.1%, χ2 = 4.200, |