Literature DB >> 34899002

Continuous Lower Abdominal Compression as a Therapeutic Intervention in COVID-19 ARDS.

Alexandru Cupaciu1,2,3, Vladimir Cohen1, Emmanuel Dudoignon1,2,3,4,5, François Dépret1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

We report the case of a patient with severe COVID-19 ARDS, suggesting a possible therapeutic intervention by applying a continuous lower abdominal compression. In order to assess ventilation distribution, a lung CT scan was performed with and without lower abdominal compression.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34899002      PMCID: PMC8655439          DOI: 10.1177/11795484211053476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med        ISSN: 1179-5484


Case Report

Recently, R. Kummer et al. described a paradoxical and reproducible improvement of respiratory system compliance (Crs) after abdominal compression in seven mechanically ventilated severe COVID-19 patients. Indeed, we have also noticed these counter intuitive phenomena, since increased intra-abdominal pressure in ARDS patients is usually associated with a decrease of Crs. In this brief report, we describe the case of one of our patients and suggest a possible therapeutic intervention by applying a continuous lower abdominal compression (LAC). We report the case of sixty years old men who necessitated intubation and mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19. After 3 days under mechanical ventilation, in semi recumbent position, despite being ventilated with 5.5 ml/kg/IBW (tidal volume of 420 ml) and 8 cmH2O of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), deeply sedated and paralyzed, his plateau pressure (Pplat) was markedly elevated at 41 cmH2O, with a calculated static pulmonary compliance of 13 ml/cmH2O. However, we noticed that placing our patient in supine position his Pplat decreased to 28 cmH2O, with a calculated compliance of 21 ml/cmH2O. Nevertheless, due to well-known complication associated with supine position in patients under mechanical ventilation (eg, ventilator associated pneumonia), we couldn’t let the patient in this position. In an attempt to find an explanation of these phenomena, we applied a lower abdominal compression (LAC) in semi recumbent and observed a drastically decreased of his Pplat from 41 to 24 cmH2O (pulmonary compliance of 26 ml/cmH2O), returning to the previous value as soon as LAC was released. Therefore, we decided to place a bag of fluid on his abdomen in order to maintain the benefit of the LAC (Figure 1). Measuring the pressure inside the bag saline applied on the lower abdomen we measured a value of 40 cmH2O needed to improve his Pplat. For the next days, we fixed with a strap a bag of 1 liter of saline on the abdomen of the patient and let him in supine position with the net conservation of the improved Pplat and Crs.
Figure 1.

Plateau Pressure in supine and semi recumbent position with and without LAC

Plateau Pressure in supine and semi recumbent position with and without LAC A lung CT scan in semi recumbent with and without abdominal compression was performed in order to assess ventilation distribution with and without LAC. Using a quantitative visual analysis by a radiologist unaware of the intervention applied, we did not observe any difference in ventilated area with and without LAC (Figure 1). Finally, the evolution was favorable and the patient was discharge alive from the ICU. The significant decrease of Pplat and increase in Crs during lower abdominal compression may result from several different mechanisms as suggested by Carteaux et al. that recently observed a similar improvement of Crs after continuous anterior chest compression. LAC by increasing pleural pressure could increase the airway opening pressure of already ventilated but over distended area leading to a redistribution of tidal volume to non-aerated lung units. Indeed, Mauri et al. have recently described an interdependence between elevated intra-abdominal, pleural, and airway pressure in severe ARDS patient. Continuous LAC allows a sustain Crs improvement and should be try as a therapeutic option in severe ARDS patient with low Crs. However, this treatment requires further exploration of its tolerance (ie, intra-abdominal pressure) and physiological effect in ARDS patients. Patient consent to publish this case study was obtained.
  6 in total

1.  Effect of intra-abdominal pressure on respiratory mechanics.

Authors:  P Pelosi; M Quintel; M L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Acta Clin Belg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.264

2.  Visual anatomical lung CT scan assessment of lung recruitability.

Authors:  Davide Chiumello; Antonella Marino; Matteo Brioni; Federica Menga; Irene Cigada; Marco Lazzerini; Maria C Andrisani; Pietro Biondetti; Bruno Cesana; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Semi-recumbent position versus supine position for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults requiring mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Li Wang; Xiao Li; Zongxia Yang; Xueli Tang; Qiang Yuan; Lijing Deng; Xin Sun
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-08

4.  Interdependence between elevated intra-abdominal, pleural, and airway opening pressure in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Elena Spinelli; Alessio Caccioppola; Ines Marongiu; Sebastiano M Colombo; Chiara Abbruzzese; Alfredo Lissoni; Paola Tagliabue; Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Potential protective effects of continuous anterior chest compression in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: physiology of an illustrative case.

Authors:  Guillaume Carteaux; Samuel Tuffet; Armand Mekontso Dessap
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Paradoxically Improved Respiratory Compliance With Abdominal Compression in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Rebecca L Kummer; Robert S Shapiro; John J Marini; Joshua S Huelster; James W Leatherman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.410

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.