Literature DB >> 34898746

Quantifying the Distorting Effect of Rapid Guessing on Estimates of Coefficient Αlpha.

Joseph A Rios1, Jiayi Deng1.   

Abstract

An underlying threat to the validity of reliability measures is the introduction of systematic variance in examinee scores from unintended constructs that differ from those assessed. One construct-irrelevant behavior that has gained increased attention in the literature is rapid guessing (RG), which occurs when examinees answer quickly with intentional disregard for item content. To examine the degree of distortion in coefficient alpha due to RG, this study compared alpha estimates between conditions in which simulees engaged in full solution (i.e., do not engage in RG) versus partial RG behavior. This was done by conducting a simulation study in which the percentage and ability characteristics of rapid responders as well as the percentage and pattern of RG were manipulated. After controlling for test length and difficulty, the average degree of distortion in estimates of coefficient alpha due to RG ranged from -.04 to .02 across 144 conditions. Although slight differences were noted between conditions differing in RG pattern and RG responder ability, the findings from this study suggest that estimates of coefficient alpha are largely robust to the presence of RG due to cognitive fatigue and a low perceived probability of success.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; coefficient alpha; non-effortful responding; rapid guessing; test-taking motivation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34898746      PMCID: PMC8655465          DOI: 10.1177/01466216211051719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  3 in total

1.  Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-05-29

2.  Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.

Authors:  Maxwell R Hong; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-12-19

3.  Is Differential Noneffortful Responding Associated With Type I Error in Measurement Invariance Testing?

Authors:  Joseph A Rios
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.088

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.