Literature DB >> 34898696

Machine learning-based prediction of MRI-induced power absorption in the tissue in patients with simplified deep brain stimulation lead models.

Jasmine Vu1, Bach T Nguyen2, Bhumi Bhusal2, Justin Baraboo1, Joshua Rosenow3, Ulas Bagci2, Molly G Bright1, Laleh Golestanirad1.   

Abstract

Interaction of an active electronic implant such as a deep brain stimulation (DBS) system and MRI RF fields can induce excessive tissue heating, limiting MRI accessibility. Efforts to quantify RF heating mostly rely on electromagnetic (EM) simulations to assess individualized specific absorption rate (SAR), but such simulations require extensive computational resources. Here, we investigate if a predictive model using machine learning (ML) can predict the local SAR in the tissue around tips of implanted leads from the distribution of the tangential component of the MRI incident electric field, Etan. A dataset of 260 unique patient-derived and artificial DBS lead trajectories was constructed, and the 1 g-averaged SAR, 1gSARmax, at the lead-tip during 1.5 T MRI was determined by EM simulations. Etan values along each lead's trajectory and the simulated SAR values were used to train and test the ML algorithm. The resulting predictions of the ML algorithm indicated that the distribution of Etan could effectively predict 1gSARmax at the DBS lead-tip (R = 0.82). Our results indicate that ML has the potential to provide a fast method for predicting MR-induced power absorption in the tissue around tips of implanted leads such as those in active electronic medical devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active implantable medical device (AIMD); RF safety; deep brain stimulation (DBS); implants; machine learning (ML); neural networks

Year:  2021        PMID: 34898696      PMCID: PMC8654205          DOI: 10.1109/temc.2021.3106872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat        ISSN: 0018-9375            Impact factor:   2.036


  31 in total

1.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Gonzalo G Mendoza; Tom Lloyd; Maria Ida Iacono; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Parallel radiofrequency transmission at 3 tesla to improve safety in bilateral implanted wires in a heterogeneous model.

Authors:  Clare E McElcheran; Benson Yang; Kevan J T Anderson; Laleh Golestanirad; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; Maria Ida Iacono; Husam Katnani; Lawrence L Wald; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Reducing RF-induced Heating near Implanted Leads through High-Dielectric Capacitive Bleeding of Current (CBLOC).

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; John Kirsch; Sean Downs; Boris Keil; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Genetic algorithm search for the worst-case MRI RF exposure for a multiconfiguration implantable fixation system modeled using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Jianfeng Zheng; Qianlong Lan; Wolfgang Kainz; Stuart A Long; Ji Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report.

Authors:  Jaimie M Henderson; Jean Tkach; Michael Phillips; Kenneth Baker; Frank G Shellock; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.

Authors:  Ehsan Kazemivalipour; Boris Keil; Alireza Vali; Sunder Rajan; Behzad Elahi; Ergin Atalar; Lawrence L Wald; Joshua Rosenow; Julie Pilitsis; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Use of Functional MRI to Assess Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation Frequency Changes on Brain Activation in Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Marisa DiMarzio; Radhika Madhavan; Ileana Hancu; Eric Fiveland; Julia Prusik; Suresh Joel; Michael Gillogly; Ilknur Telkes; Michael D Staudt; Jennifer Durphy; Damian Shin; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Realistic modeling of deep brain stimulation implants for electromagnetic MRI safety studies.

Authors:  Bastien Guerin; Peter Serano; Maria Ida Iacono; Todd M Herrington; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Giorgio Bonmassar; Leonardo M Angelone; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Numerical Simulations of Realistic Lead Trajectories and an Experimental Verification Support the Efficacy of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission to Reduce Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants during MRI.

Authors:  C E McElcheran; L Golestanirad; M I Iacono; P-S Wei; B Yang; K J T Anderson; G Bonmassar; S J Graham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.