Literature DB >> 34898525

National Trends in Length of Stay for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 10,465 Cases Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Kathleen A Holoyda1, David A Magno-Padron1, Gentry C Carter1, Jay P Agarwal1, Alvin C Kwok1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreasing length of stay benefits patients and hospital systems alike. This should be accomplished safely without negatively impacting patient outcomes. The authors hypothesize that in the United States, the average length of stay for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction has decreased since 2012 without a concurrent increase in complication and readmission rates.
METHODS: The authors identified female patients who underwent microvascular breast reconstruction (CPT 19364) from the 2012 to 2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Trends in complication and readmission rates and length of stay were examined over 7 years. Multivariable logistic regression models and Mann-Kendall trend tests were used to evaluate associations between length of stay and complication and readmission rates.
RESULTS: A total of 10,465 cases were identified. The number of autologous microvascular breast reconstruction procedures performed increased annually between 2012 and 2018. Length of stay decreased significantly from 2012 to 2018 (from 4.47 days to 3.90 days) (p < 0.01). Minor and major complication rates remained constant, although major complications showed a decreasing trend (from 27 percent to 21 percent) (p = 0.07). Thirty-day readmission, surgical-site infection, and wound dehiscence rates remained consistent over the study period, whereas rates of blood transfusion or bleeding decreased (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Using a national sample from 2012 to 2018, the authors observed a significant decrease in length of stay for patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction without a concurrent increase in complication and readmission rates. Current efforts to reduce length of stay have been successful without increasing complication or readmission rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34898525     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes following robotic versus conventional DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: A retrospective matched study.

Authors:  Min Jeong Lee; Jongmin Won; Seung Yong Song; Hyung Seok Park; Jee Ye Kim; Hye Jung Shin; Young In Kwon; Dong Won Lee; Na Young Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in DIEP-Flap Breast Reconstructions-A Comparison of Two Reconstructive Centers with and without ERAS-Protocol.

Authors:  Sora Linder; Leonard Walle; Marios Loucas; Rafael Loucas; Onno Frerichs; Hisham Fansa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.