André Bouville1, Harold L Beck2, Lynn R Anspaugh3, Konstantin Gordeev4, Sergey Shinkarev5, Kathleen M Thiessen6, F Owen Hoffman6, Steven L Simon7. 1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (retired). 2. Department of Energy (retired), New York, NY. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Utah (Emeritus), Henderson, NV. 4. State Research Center-Institute of Biophysics of the Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation (deceased). 5. State Research Center-Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russian Federation. 6. Oak Ridge Center for Risk Analysis, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN. 7. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: A methodology of assessment of the doses from external irradiation resulting from the ground deposition of radioactive debris (fallout) from a nuclear detonation is proposed in this paper. The input data used to apply this methodology for a particular location are the outdoor exposure rate at any time after deposition of fallout and the time-of-arrival of fallout, as indicated and discussed in a companion paper titled "A Method for Estimating the Deposition Density of Fallout on the Ground and on Vegetation from a Low-yield Low-altitude Nuclear Detonation." Example doses are estimated for several age categories and for all radiosensitive organs and tissues identified in the most recent ICRP publications. Doses are calculated for the first year after the detonation, when more than 90% of the external dose is delivered for populations close to the detonation site over a time period of 70 y, which is intended to represent the lifetime dose. Modeled doses in their simplest form assume no environmental remediation, though modifications can be introduced. Two types of dose assessment are considered: (1) initial, for a rapid but only approximate dose estimation soon after the nuclear detonation; and (2) improved, for a later, more accurate, dose assessment following the analysis of post-detonation measurements of radiation exposure and fallout deposition and the access of information on the lifestyle of the exposed population.
ABSTRACT: A methodology of assessment of the doses from external irradiation resulting from the ground deposition of radioactive debris (fallout) from a nuclear detonation is proposed in this paper. The input data used to apply this methodology for a particular location are the outdoor exposure rate at any time after deposition of fallout and the time-of-arrival of fallout, as indicated and discussed in a companion paper titled "A Method for Estimating the Deposition Density of Fallout on the Ground and on Vegetation from a Low-yield Low-altitude Nuclear Detonation." Example doses are estimated for several age categories and for all radiosensitive organs and tissues identified in the most recent ICRP publications. Doses are calculated for the first year after the detonation, when more than 90% of the external dose is delivered for populations close to the detonation site over a time period of 70 y, which is intended to represent the lifetime dose. Modeled doses in their simplest form assume no environmental remediation, though modifications can be introduced. Two types of dose assessment are considered: (1) initial, for a rapid but only approximate dose estimation soon after the nuclear detonation; and (2) improved, for a later, more accurate, dose assessment following the analysis of post-detonation measurements of radiation exposure and fallout deposition and the access of information on the lifestyle of the exposed population.
Authors: Steven L Simon; Lynn R Anspaugh; F Owen Hoffman; Alan E Scholl; Mary B Stone; Brian A Thomas; Joseph L Lyon Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: C E Land; Z Zhumadilov; B I Gusev; M H Hartshorne; P W Wiest; P W Woodward; L A Crooks; N K Luckyanov; C M Fillmore; Z Carr; G Abisheva; H L Beck; A Bouville; J Langer; R Weinstock; K I Gordeev; S Shinkarev; S L Simon Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: André Bouville; Harold L Beck; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Nancy Potischman; Steven L Simon Journal: Health Phys Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Charles E Land; Deukwoo Kwon; F Owen Hoffman; Brian Moroz; Vladimir Drozdovitch; André Bouville; Harold Beck; Nicholas Luckyanov; Robert M Weinstock; Steven L Simon Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: E A Cohen Hubal; L S Sheldon; J M Burke; T R McCurdy; M R Berry; M L Rigas; V G Zartarian; N C Freeman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Harold L Beck; Lynn R Anspaugh; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Sergey Shinkarev Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Dunstana R Melo; Luiz Bertelli; Shawki A Ibrahim; Lynn R Anspaugh; André Bouville; Steven L Simon Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; André Bouville; Lynn R Anspaugh; Harold L Beck; Steven L Simon Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Harold L Beck; André Bouville; Steven L Simon; Lynn R Anspaugh; Kathleen M Thiessen; Sergey Shinkarev; Konstantin Gordeev Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Lynn R Anspaugh; André Bouville; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Harold L Beck; Konstantin I Gordeev; Steven L Simon Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Harold L Beck; Lynn R Anspaugh; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Sergey Shinkarev Journal: Health Phys Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 1.316