| Literature DB >> 34897250 |
Min Jeong Kim1, Chang Ki Shim1, Jong-Ho Park1.
Abstract
Although late blight is an important disease in eco-friendly potato cultivation in Korea, it is highly dependent on the use of eco-friendly agricultural materials and the development of biological control technology is low. It is a necessary to develop an effective biocontrol agent to inactivate late blight in the field. AFB2-2 strain is a gram-positive with peritrichous flagella. It can utilize 20 types of carbon sources, like L-arabinose, and D-trehalose at 35°C. The optimal growth temperature of the strain is 37°C. It can survive at 20-50°C in tryptic soy broth. The maximum salt concentration tolerated by AFB2-2 strain is 7.5% NaCl. AFB2-2 strain inhibited the mycelial growth of seven plant pathogens by an average inhibitory zone of 10.2 mm or more. Among the concentrations of AFB2-2, 107 cfu/ml showed the highest control value of 85.7% in the greenhouse. Among the three concentrations of AFB2-2, the disease incidence and severity of potato late blight at 107 cfu/ml was lowest at 0.07 and 6.7, respectively. The nucleotide sequences of AFB2-2 strain were searched in the NCBI GenBank; Bacillus siamensis strain KCTC 13613, Bacillus velezensis strain CR-502, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain DSM7 were found to have a genetic similarity of 99.7%, 99.7%, and 99.5%, respectively. The AFB2-2 strain was found to harbor the biosynthetic genes for bacillomycin D, iturin, and surfactin. Obtained data recommended that the B. velezensis AFB2-2 strain could be considered as a promising biocontrol agent for P. infestans in the field.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus velezensis AFB2-2; Phytotphthora infestans; biocontrol agents; potato
Year: 2021 PMID: 34897250 PMCID: PMC8666241 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.FT.09.2021.0138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
PCR primer for the detection of biosynthesis genes of the Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 strain
| Antibiotic | Gene | Primers | Sequence (5′-3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| BACC1F | GAAGGACACGGCAGAGAGTC |
|
| BACC1R | CGCTGATGACTGTTCATGCT | |||
| Fengycin |
| FEND1F | TTTGGCAGCAGGAGAAGTTT | |
| FEND1R | GCTGTCCGTTCTGCTTTTTC | |||
| Iturin A |
| ITUD1F | GATGCGATCTCCTTGGATGT | |
| ITUD1R | ATCGTCATGTGCTGCTTGAG | |||
| Surfactin |
| SUR3F | ACAGTATGGAGGCATGGTC | |
| SUR3R | TTCCGCCACTTTTTCAGTTT | |||
| Zwittermicin A |
| ZWITF2 | TTGGGAGAATATACAGCTCT | |
| ZWITR1 | GACCTTTTGAAATGGGCGTA |
Fig. 1Screening of antifungal activity of 320 bacterial strains against Phytophthora infestans and Fusarium oxysporum on medium.
Morphological characteristics and the estimation of carbon sources (carbohydrates) of Bacillus sp. AFB2-2
| Carbohydrates | Incubation temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 28 | 35 | |
| Control | − | − |
| Glycerol | +++ | +++ |
| Erythritol | − | − |
| D-Arabinose | − | − |
| L-Arabinose | − | + |
| D-Ribose | − | + |
| D-Xylose | − | − |
| L-Xylose | − | − |
| D-Adonitol | − | − |
| Methyl-β-D-xylopyranoisde | − | − |
| D-Galactose | − | − |
| D-Glucose | ++ | ++ |
| D-Fructose | + | + |
| D-Mannose | ++ | ++ |
| L-Sorbose | − | − |
| L-Rhamnose | − | − |
| Dulcitol | − | − |
| Inositol | − | +++ |
| D-Mannitol | ++ | ++ |
| D-Sorbitol | +++ | +++ |
| Methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside | − | − |
| Methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside | − | + |
| N-Acetylglucosamine | − | − |
| Amygdalin | − | + |
| Arbutin | − | + |
| Esculin ferric citrate | ++++ | ++++ |
| Salicin | − | + |
| D-Cellobose | + | ++ |
| D-Maltose | − | +++ |
| D-Lactose | − | + |
| D-Melibiose | − | − |
| S-Saccharose (sucrose) | + | + |
| D-Trehalose | ++ | +++ |
| Inulin | − | − |
| D-Melezitose | − | − |
| D-Raffinose | − | + |
| Amidon (starch) | − | + |
| Glycogen | − | + |
| Xylitol | − | − |
| Gentiobiose | + | + |
| D-Turanose | − | − |
| D-Lyxose | − | − |
| D-Tagatose | − | − |
| D-Fucose | − | − |
| L-Fucose | − | − |
| D-Arabitol | − | − |
| L-Arabitol | − | − |
| Potassium gluconate | − | − |
| Potassium 2-ketogluconate | − | − |
| Potassium 5-ketogluconate | − | − |
Morphological shape: white, rods; Gram stain: +, Spore: +; Mortality: +; Flagella: Positive (Peritrichous); Cell size (μm): (1.56 ± 0.13) × (0.58 ± 0.05).
Fig. 2Culture on tryptic soy agar medium (A–C) and electron microscopic observation (D) of Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 by transmission electron microscopy (×10,000, 100 Kv). Scale bar = 2 μm.
Comparison of phenotype among AFB2-2 strain and type strains of Bacillus sp. in silico
| Assimitation | In this study |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| AFB2-2 | DSM7[ | KCTC 13613[ | LMG 22478[ | MWS28[ | |
| L-Arabinose | + | W | + | + | + |
| D-Xylose | − | W | + | + | + |
| D-Mannose | ++ | + | W | + | + |
| D-Trehalose | +++ | − | − | + | + |
W, weak growth; +, growth; ++, well growth; +++, very well growth; −, no growth.
DSM7: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
KCTC 13613: Bacillus siamensis.
LMG 22478: Bacillus velezensis.
MWS28: Bacillus velezensis.
Fig. 3Effect of the temperature range (10–60°C) on the growth of Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 in tryptic soy broth medium. Scale bars represent standard errors.
Salt tolerance of Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 estimated at different NaCl concentrations
| NaCl contents (w/v, %) | Optical density (OD, 600 nm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 0 h | 5 h | 10 h | 15 h | 20 h | 25 h | |
| 0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.35 ± 0.02 | 1.58 ± 0.01 | 1.78 ± 0.02 | 2.23 ± 0.01 | 2.55 ± 0.02 |
| 1.0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.35 ± 0.01 | 1.58 ± 0.02 | 1.79 ± 0.01 | 2.24 ± 0.01 | 2.58 ± 0.02 |
| 2.0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 1.79 ± 0.01 | 2.25 ± 0.02 | 2.57 ± 0.01 |
| 2.5 | 0 ± 0 | 1.41 ± 0.03 | 1.6 ± 0.02 | 1.91 ± 0.01 | 2.31 ± 0.02 | 2.64 ± 0.02 |
| 3.0 | 0 ± 0 | 1.20 ± 0.02 | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 1.65 ± 0.02 | 2.12 ± 0.02 | 2.34 ± 0.01 |
| 5.5 | 0 ± 0 | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 1.38 ± 0.01 | 1.56 ± 0.01 | 1.85 ± 0.01 |
| 6.0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.90 ± 0.01 | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 1.25 ± 0.02 | 1.43 ± 0.01 | 1.65 ± 0.02 |
| 7.5 | 0 ± 0 | 0.90 ± 0.01 | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 1.2 ± 0.01 | 1.41 ± 0.01 | 1.50 ± 0.01 |
Evaluation of the antifungal ability of Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 strain against seven major plant pathogens
| Treatment | Mycelia growth of fungal plant pathogens (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| FO | BC | RS | SS | PU | PI | CG | |
| AFB 2-2 | 15.1 ± 1.4 | 18.1 ± 1.2 | 27.1 ± 1.6 | 25.3 ± 1.5 | 20.3 ± 1.2 | 12.4 ± 1.0 | 10.2 ± 1.0 |
| CK | 41.5 ± 1.6 | 45.0 ± 2.1 | 45.4 ± 2.5 | 45.2 ± 2.2 | 45.5 ± 1.4 | 46.0 ± 1.4 | 35.5 ± 1.1 |
| Inhibition (%) | 63.6 ± 2.0 | 59.8 ± 1.8 | 40.3 ± 2.4 | 44.0 ± 2.0 | 55.4 ± 1.8 | 73.0 ± 2.2 | 71.2 ± 2.5 |
FO, Fusarium oxysporum (KACC 43207); BC, Botrytis cinerea (KACC 40963); RS, Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2 (KACC 40130); SS, Sclerotinia sclreotiorum (KACC 41069); PU, Pythium ultimum (KACC 40705); PI, Phytophthora infestans (KACC 43073); CG, Collectotrichum gloeo-sporioiedes (KACC 40003).
Effect of Bacillus velezensis AFB2-2 on the control of potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans under greenhouse conditions
| Treatment content (×cfu/ml) | Disease incidence[ | Control efficacy[ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| 7 DAT | 14 DAT | 28 DAT | 7 DAT | 14 DAT | 28 DAT | |
| AFB2-2 (105) | 17.9 ± 0.47 | 28.9 ± 0.94 | 33.3 ± 0.82 | 61.9 c[ | 65.8 c | 64.3 c |
| AFB2-2 (106) | 13.3 ± 0.82 | 17.8 ± 0.47 | 22.2 ± 0.47 | 71.4 b | 78.9 b | 76.2 b |
| AFB2-2 (107) | 2.2 ± 0.47 | 11.1 ± 0.94 | 13.3 ± 0.82 | 95.2 a | 86.8 a | 85.7 a |
| Control | 46.7 ± 0.82 | 84.4 ± 0.47 | 93.3 ± 0.82 | - | - | - |
DAT, days after treatment.
Disease incidence (%) = (Number of Infected plant/Number tested plant) × 100.
Control value (%) = (Infection percentage of control – Infection percentage of each treatment/Infection percentage of control) × 100.
Mean separation within columns using Duncan’s multiple range test and different letters indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).
Control efficacy of the Bacillus velezensis AFB2-2 against potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans in organic potato cultivation field
| Treatment content (×cfu/ml) | Disease severity[ | Disease incidence[ | Control value[ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 7 DAT | 21 DAT | 42 DAT | 7 DAT | 21 DAT | 42 DAT | 7 DAT | 21 DAT | 42 DAT | |
| AFB2-2 (105) | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 26.7 ± 5.4 | 33.3 ± 0.0 | 31.1 ± 3.1 | 42.9 | 48.3 | 60.0 |
| AFB2-2 (106) | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 20.0 ± 5.4 | 26.7 ± 5.4 | 22.2 ± 3.1 | 57.1 | 58.6 | 71.4 |
| AFB2-2 (107) | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 4.4 ± 3.1 | 13.3 ± 0.0 | 13.3 ± 5.4 | 90.5 | 79.3 | 82.9 |
| Control | 2.18 ± 0.03 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 2.18 ± 0.03 | 46.7 ± 5.4 | 64.4 ± 3.1 | 77.8 ± 3.1 | - | - | - |
DAT, days after treatment.
Disease severity: 0, no infested leaves; 1, 0.1–25% infested leaves area; 2, 25.1–50% infested leaves area; 3, 50.1–75% infested leaves area; 4, >75.1% infested leaves area.
Disease incidence (%) = (Number of Infected plant/Number tested plant) × 100.
Control value (%) = (Infection percentage of control – Infection percentage of each treatment/Infection percentage of control) × 100.
Fig. 4Monitoring of soil and air temperature of organic potato cultivation field during the spring season in Wonju.
Fig. 5Base sequence comparison analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence for Bacillus sp. AFB2-2 and the related Bacillus bacteria. The tree was generated using Neighbor-joining. Scale bar = 0.0005 substitutions per nucleotide.
Fig. 6PCR detection of biosynthetic genes, bacillomycin D (bmyA), fengycin (fenD), iturin A (ituA), surfactin (srfA), and zwittermicin A (zwiA) Bacillus velezensis AFB2-2. N, negative control; M, molecular marker (100-bp DNA ladder).