Literature DB >> 34896786

On the very idea of pursuitworthiness.

Jamie Shaw1.   

Abstract

Recent philosophical literature has turned its attention towards assessments of how to judge scientific proposals as worthy of further inquiry. Previous work, as well as papers contained within this special issue, propose criteria for pursuitworthiness (Achinstein, 1993; Whitt, 1992; DiMarco & Khalifa, 2019; Laudan, 1977; Shan, 2020; Šešelja et al., 2012). The purpose of this paper is to assess the grounds on which pursuitworthiness demands can be legitimately made. To do this, I propose a challenge to the possibility of even minimal criteria of pursuitworthiness, inspired by Paul Feyerabend. I go on to provide a framework for identifying the contexts in which pursuitworthiness criteria may promote the efficiency of scientific inquiry. I then spell out some implications this framework has for values and pursuit. Crown
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34896786     DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Hist Philos Sci        ISSN: 0039-3681            Impact factor:   1.429


  2 in total

1.  Distributing epistemic and practical risks: a comparative study of communicating earthquake damages.

Authors:  Li-An Yu
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 1.595

2.  Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy.

Authors:  Jamie Shaw
Journal:  J Gen Philos Sci       Date:  2022-01-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.