| Literature DB >> 34895288 |
Sunusi Rimi Garba1, Christian Chigozie Makwe2,3, Vincent Oluseye Osunkalu3,4, Olufunto Olufela Kalejaiye3,5, Adaiah Priscillia Soibi-Harry2, Amina Umar Aliyu6, Bosede Bukola Afolabi2,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease is the most common monogenetic disorder worldwide. There have been reports of endocrine dysfunction and gonadal failure among affected individuals, especially in males. The findings on ovarian reserve and failure in women with sickle anaemia have been inconsistent. AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Anti-Mullerian hormone; Diminished ovarian reserve; Haemoglobinopathy; Hydroxyurea; Nigeria; Ovarian reserve; Ovarian sickling; Sickle cell anaemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34895288 PMCID: PMC8666009 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00927-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ovarian Res ISSN: 1757-2215 Impact factor: 4.234
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants
| Variable | HbSS | HbAA | X2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| <35 | 63(75.9) | 65(78.3) | 0.3065 | 0.959 |
| ≥35 | 20(24.1) | 18(21.7) | ||
| 27.9(±7.5) | 27.4(±7.9) | 0.39283 | 0.6950‡ | |
| Skilled professional | 38(45.8) | 32(38.6) | 3.5660 | 0.312 |
| Semi-skilled professional | 22(26.5) | 29(34.9) | ||
| Unskilled professional | 19(22.9) | 14(16.9) | ||
| Unemployed | 4(4.8) | 8(9.6) | ||
| Yoruba | 62(74.7) | 58(69.9) | 1.6889 | 0.639 |
| Igbo | 10(12.1) | 15(18.1) | ||
| Hausa | 1(1.1) | 2(2.4) | ||
| Other | 10(12.1) | 8(9.6) | ||
| 0 | 69(83.1) | 64(77.1) | 3.0526 | 0.217 |
| ≥1 | 14(16.9) | 19(22.9) | ||
| Yes | 27(32.5) | 28(33.7) | 0.0272 | 0.869 |
| No | 56 (67.5) | 55(66.3) | ||
| Yes | 2 (2.4) | 1(1.2) | 0.3395 | 0.560 |
| No | 81(97.6) | 82(98.8) | ||
| <25 | 75(90.4) | 50(60.2) | 23.094 | <0.001* |
| ≥25 | 8(9.6) | 33(39.8) | ||
20.7(±3.0) 5(6.0) 78(94.6) | 23.6(±4.2) - - | .0349 0.665 | <0.001*‡ 0.736 | |
‡Student t-test statistic
Comparison of serum AMH levels between HbSS and HbAA study participants
| AMH categories (ng/mL) | HbSS (N=83) n (%) | HbAA (N=83) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | X2 | |||
| 18 (21.7) | 9 (10.8) | 9.963 | 0.007* | |
| 14 (16.9) | 5 (6.0) | |||
| 51 (61.4) | 69 (83.1) | |||
| 3.64 (0.65) | 7.35 (1.19) | -5.398‡ | <0.001* | |
‡student’s t test, * Statistically significant
Correlation analysis of serum AMH and age/body mass index of HbSS and HbAA study participants
| Variable | HbSS | HbAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | -0.255 | 0.020 | -0.425 | <0.001* |
| BMI | 0.035 | 0.733 | -0.240 | 0.029 |
r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient, * Statistically significant
Regression analysis of the predictors of serum anti-Mullerian Hormone participants with HbSS and HbAA
| Variables | Simple linear regression | Multiple linear regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (β) | 95%Confidence interval | Adjusted Coefficient (adjusted | 95% Confidence interval | |||
| -4.24 | -5.68 to -2.80 | <0.001* | -4.42 | -5.88 to -2.96 | <0.001* | |
| -0.02 | -0.07 to 0.03 | 0.457 | -0.02 | -0.06 to 0.03 | 0.436 | |
| Age | -0.19 | -0.29 to -0.08 | <0.001* | -0.18 | -0.28 to -0. | <0.001* |
| (years) | ||||||
$ BMI: Body Mass Index, * statistically significant at P-value <0.05, Reference: HBAA