Literature DB >> 34894304

Cow products: boon to human health and food security.

Arti Prasad1, Naresh Kothari2.   

Abstract

The world population exceeded 7.8 billion people in 2020 and is predicted to reach 9.9 billion by 2050 as per the current increasing rate of 25%. In view of this, ensuring human health and food security has become an issue of key importance to countries with different degrees of economic development. At the same time, the livestock sector plays a strategic role in improving the economic, environmental, and sociocultural stewardship of any nation. The cow (Bos indicus) has held a distinctive role in human history ever since its domestication because of its valued harvests like dairy products (milk, clarified butter, yogurt, curd, and buttermilk) excreta like dung and urine. These products, except dung, provide all the necessary energy and nutrients to ensure the proper growth and development of the human. They are the source of many bioactive substances, which possess immense pharmacotherapeutic action against various physiological, metabolic and infectious disorders, including COVID-19. The use of urine and dung can be considered a low-cost agricultural practice for farmers and has been extensively used in modern agriculture practices to ensure food security via soil fertility, plant pathogens, and pests. Cow urine mediated synthesized nanomaterial also display distinctive characteristics and novel applications in various fields of science and technology. Thus, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of cow products, describing their biochemical constituents, bioactivities, and their utilization in the area ranging from human welfare to agriculture sustainability. An attempt is also made to present possible applications in bioenergy production and pollution reduction.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioenergy; Cow; Food security; Human health; Livestock; Nutrition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34894304      PMCID: PMC8665701          DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-03014-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


Introduction

Health and food security are essential to all organisms, most pointedly to human beings. Primarily both are states of cognizance as well as physical conditions, and if they are inattentive, the human being can die eventually (Friel and Ford 2015). Food security is also a part of the panoply of conditions that signal directly compromised human beings' health status (Gregory and Coleman-Jensen 2017). It has worsened the effects of all types of diseases (i.e., infectious diseases, deficiency diseases, physiological diseases, etc.) and can accelerate negative perceptions of self-worth in children and elders (Siddique et al. 2017; Wells et al. 2020). In view of the current population growth, which is exceeded 7.8 billion in 2020 and is predicted to reach 9.9 billion by 2050, human health and food security are probably the major global issue (Pawlak and Kołodziejczak 2020). The United Nations (UN) has introduced health and food security as a prime concern among Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and set different targets to resolve this issue with available resources (Pérez-Escamilla 2017; Gil et al. 2019). Cattle, including cows (female) and bulls (male), have held a very distinctive role in human history ever since their domestication. Earlier, they were raised for their products like milk, meat, and leather and are also used as draft animals in farming and transport practices (McInerney 2010). Nowadays, they are important contributors to any developing nation’s economic, environmental, and sociocultural stewardship across Europe, Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. In Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, 75% of the rural population and 25% of the urban population are directly benefited by the cattle in terms of food, income, employment, and social security (Enahoro et al. 2019; Varijakshapanicker et al. 2019). The cow (Bos taurus or Bos indicus) has been placed at a high pedestal for enormous usages of their valued harvests like the dairy products (colostrum, milk, clarified butter, yogurt, etc.) and animal waste like dung and urine (Gupta et al. 2016; Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020). Such products are the major ingredient in “Panchagavya” that has been widely used as a rejuvenating tonic, immune booster, and other therapeutic formulations in Ayurveda for millennia (Joshi et al. 2015). They are also huge sources of many bioactive substances, responsible for their diverse pharmacological actions (Joseph et al. 2020; Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020). In the past few years, several investigations have been confirmed their effectiveness, individually or in combination with herbal formulation, for the treatment of many infectious, physiological, and metabolic disorders in humans, including cancer, diabetes, hypertension, and viral diseases (Randhawa and Sharma 2015; Suk et al. 2018). Recently, cow urine has been used for nanomaterial synthesis (copper, silver, and palladium nanoparticles) with numerous biomedical applications (Vinay et al. 2019; Prasad et al. 2020; Padvi et al. 2020). Recent studies also revealed their immune-modulating efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in humans (Jawhara 2020; Mann and Ndung’u 2020). In addition, pathogens and soil degradation worsen the current deficit of the global food supply in which about 7.8 billion people are inadequately fed. Agricultural losses can mean that people become dependent on imported or synthetic foods, often replacing a balanced diet with such foods create further health problems (Pawlak and Kołodziejczak 2020). The literature suggests that cow products seem to be beneficial against various phytopathogens (i.e., bacteria, fungi, nematodes, etc.) responsible for abridged agricultural production (Jandaik et al. 2015; Nega and Getu 2020). A number of studies have also revealed their ability to replenish nutritional deficiencies in soils and improve gross agricultural yield (Kaleri et al. 2020; Praburaman et al. 2020). Due to their large range of nutritional components and bioactivities, cow products have attracted increasing focus from a number of research fields. Therefore, the present paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of different cow products, describing their biochemical constituents, bioactivities, and their utilization in the area ranging from human welfare to agriculture sustainability. This review also intends to highlight the possible application of cow products in bioenergy production and remediation of environmental pollutants.

Cow products for human health management

The secretion or products of animal origin, especially bovine animals, have been mentioned as healthcare remedies in most ancient medicine systems, including Traditional Chinese Medicine, Western Medicine, and Indian Medicine. Due to their broad spectrum of nutritional components and bioactivities has also received attention from modern pharmacopeia and many other research fields. The following are only a few examples (discussed in sub-sections) to illustrate the utilization of cow products in the area ranging from human nutrition to pharmacotherapeutics.

Overview on nutritional aspects of cow products

Since ancient times, rural and urban households have used different cow products in their everyday lives without bothering much about their nutritional and other scientific context. Nutritional studies in the last few decades showed cow products, especially milk and milk-derived products, to be complete, versatile, and nutritious foods for humans (Watson et al. 2017). It seems that such products are nutrient-dense and provide high-quality dietary supplements (i.e., carbohydrates, protein, fat, micronutrients, etc.) in an easily absorbed form that can advantage both nutritionally vulnerable and healthy peoples(Buttar et al. 2017; Panahipour et al. 2018). Among cow products, colostrum (first mammary secretion during the first 0–120 h after delivery) and milk are the old trusted form of health drink, which roots back to ancient pharmacopeia and till today regarded as imperious stuff for the holistic growth and development of the body (Puppel et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2019). Cows can provide readily available nutrient-rich colostrum and milk in large quantities. Nutritionally, they are a source of dietary supplements and the source of a wide variety of protective factors (Fig. 1). However, colostrum is considered the most nutritive form of cow milk, but its biological and nurturing value decreases over time (Table 1). Earlier, colostrum was usually consumed in its liquid form for the dietary purpose of both children and adults worldwide (Butter et al. 2017). Nowadays, the solid form is used to manufacture colostrum-based nutraceuticals that are dispensed and formulated into capsules, tablets, and powder using low-heat pasteurization and indirect steam drying (Dzik et al. 2017). Cow milk has the highest consumption among animal milk in India, Brazil, China, Sudan, Ethiopia, the USA, Argentina, and Paraguay. Antony et al. (2018) reported that it has a 90% share in world total milk production, followed by buffalo milk (5%), goat milk (3%), and sheep milk (2%). Cow milk appeared to occupy a unique position among many dietary foods as it contains a sufficient concentration of valued nutrients that ensure the necessary nutrient needs for humans' cognitive and physical development (Table 2). Proteins are the fundamental part of cow milk and mainly comprise a soluble component (whey protein, 20% of milk protein fraction) and an insoluble component (caseins protein, 80% of milk protein fraction). Nutritionally, both components are good sources of amino acids, which are essential for the growth and health maintenance of human beings (El-Sayed and Awad 2019; Scholz-Ahrens et al. 2020). Cow milk is considered a high-quality protein source compared to goat milk, taking into account the essential amino acid, especially isoleucine, threonine, methionine, and tyrosine (Table 3). Clarified butter known as “ghee” prepared by heating milk, is also considered a good source of lipophilic composition such as conjugated linoleic acid and vitamins (A and E) that exhibited several nutraceutical actions, both in vitro and in vivo (Rani and Kansal 2012; Pena-Serna and Restrepo-Betancur 2020). Cow milk yogurt is also popular nutritious fermented food and is usually consumed for dietary purposes worldwide. Mainly, fat (total lipid) constitutes the main fraction of both clarified butter as well as yogurt and is responsible for their highly energetic and nutritive value (Shori and Baba 2014; Antony et al. 2018). Among animal waste, cow urine has been extensively used for nutritional purposes for a long time, especially as a health drink. Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of many essential micronutrients (calcium, phosphorous), vitamins (B1, B2, and C), and enzymes (amylase, acid phosphatase, lactate, and lactate dehydrogenase, etc.) in cow urine (Mohanvel et al. 2017; Ketan et al. 2020). Studies also confirmed that cow dung harbors a rich microbial diversity and a good source of essential enzymes and metabolites of human interest (Gupta et al. 2016; Semwal et al. 2019). Joseph et al. (2020) revealed 20 bioactive compounds in Bos indicus and Bos taurus dung samples. However, cow breeds with differences in genetic makeup and several other aspects (i.e., age of animal, lactation and gestation stage of the animal, feed-related factors, and climatic influences) have a striking effect on chemical composition as well as the nutritional value of different cow products(Singhal et al. 2016; Puppel et al. 2019).
Fig. 1

Overview of different constituents present in cow colostrum and milk. β-LG = β-lactoglobulin, α-LA = α-lactalbumin, BSA = bovine serum albumin, LF = lactoferrin, IL = interleukins, IFN = interferon, TNF = tumor necrosis factor, TGF = transforming growth factor, PRP = proline-rich polypeptide, G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, M-CSF = macrophage colony-stimulating factor, GM-CSF = granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor

Table 1

Changes in the nutritional composition of cow colostrum (%) over time (Horecka 2016)

CompositionsImmediately after calving (0.5–1 h)After 12 hAfter 24 hAfter 48 hAfter 6 daysAfter 25 days
Water66.479.184.486.387.987.6
Casein5.574.474.233.912.763.0
Albumin, globulin16.928.982.631.230.750.5
Fat6.52.53.63.73.73.8
Lactose2.133.514.244.514.784.6
Table 2

Average nutritional composition of cow’s milk compared with dietary reference intakes

Characteristics/compositionAmount (per 240 mL or 244 g)aRecommended dietary allowance (adequate intake)b
Children (1–13 years)Younger (13–30 years)Older (above 30 years)
Energy (kcal)145–1501000–18001800–32001800–2200
Protein (g)7.65–9.013–3434–5646–56
Fat (g)7.98–8.2025–3520–3520–35
Carbohydrates (g)11.28–12.8130130130
Vitamin A (µg)55.5–118.555.5–118.5300–600700–900
Vitamin D (µg)0.05–3.100.05–3.101515
Vitamin B1 (mg)0.090–0.110.090–0.110.5–0.91.0–1.2
Vitamin B2 (mg)0.390–0.450.390–0.450.5–0.91.0–1.3
Vitamin B3 (mg)0.200–0.230.200–0.236–1214–16
Vitamin B6 (mg)0.088–0.110.088–0.110.5–1.01.2–1.3
Folate (µg)12.01–12.6812.01–12.68150–300300–400
Vitamin B12 (mg)0.87–1.220.87–1.220.9–1.82.4
Calcium (mg)276–310276–310700–13001000–1300
Phosphorous (mg)205–252.5205–252.5460–1250700–1250
Magnesium (mg)24–35.524–35.51.2–1.91.6–2.3
Sodium (mg)105–130105–1301500–22002300
Potassium (mg)377.5–415377.5–4153000–45004700

aValued from Pereira (2014) andSinghal et al. (2017)

bValued from Anonymous (2017) andWang et al. (2016)

Table 3

Essential amino acids, their supply by cow milk, goat milk, and cow colostrum, and requirement of human

Name of amino acidConcentration in cow milk (mg/100 g)aConcentration in goat milk (mg/100 g)bConcentration in cow colostrum (g/100 g)c Requirement (mg/kg body weight/day)a
Histidine (His)87122.731.4610
Isoleucine (Ileu)170160.541.5120
Lysine (Lys)327342.864.0930
Leucine (Leu)380341.014.7339
Methionine (Met)11177.950.9310
Cystine (Cys)2930.620.8504
Phenylalanine (Phe)173175.452.5225
Tyrosine (Tyr)183162.514.49
Threonine (Thr)167138.673.3215
Tryptophan (Trp)42--04
Valine (Val)225210.232.8326

- not determined

aValues fromScholz-Ahrens et al. (2020)

bValues fromCeballos et al. (2009)

*cPuppel et al. (2019)

Overview of different constituents present in cow colostrum and milk. β-LG = β-lactoglobulin, α-LA = α-lactalbumin, BSA = bovine serum albumin, LF = lactoferrin, IL = interleukins, IFN = interferon, TNF = tumor necrosis factor, TGF = transforming growth factor, PRP = proline-rich polypeptide, G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, M-CSF = macrophage colony-stimulating factor, GM-CSF = granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor Changes in the nutritional composition of cow colostrum (%) over time (Horecka 2016) Average nutritional composition of cow’s milk compared with dietary reference intakes aValued from Pereira (2014) andSinghal et al. (2017) bValued from Anonymous (2017) andWang et al. (2016) Essential amino acids, their supply by cow milk, goat milk, and cow colostrum, and requirement of human - not determined aValues fromScholz-Ahrens et al. (2020) bValues fromCeballos et al. (2009) *cPuppel et al. (2019)

Cow products in the traditional pharmacopeia

Cow products are well known for their traditional practices of medicine since time immemorial. These products have received extensive importance in Ayurveda, while slighter attention has been given to Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine (Wang and Carey 2014; Rai 2019). Ayurvedic classics such as Charak Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, Bhaisajya Ratnavali, and Arya-Bhishak described different properties of cow products and therapeutic potentials. Cow milk has been mentioned for its ability to strengthens the seven Dhatus (tissues) such as Rasa (plasma), Rakta (blood), Mamsa (muscle), Meda (adipose tissue), Asthi (bone), Majja (bone marrow), and Shukra (reproductive tissue) in Charak Samhita. It has also been used to improve memory and boost immunity (Raut and Vaidya 2018). Cow ghee or Ghrita (clarified butter) has been mentioned to treat wounds, chronic fevers and nourish the body tissues and vital fluid. Fresh butter is considered for curing skin diseases and several other problems caused due to blood impurity (Shukla et al. 2012; Joshi 2014). In Ayurvedic therapeutics, cow urine (Gomutra) is frequently referred to for use because of its yearlong availability, cost-effectiveness, and special sanctity attached to the cow in India. In Charak Samhita, it is mentioned as a regulator governing several abdominal and dermatological disorders such as itching (Kandu), eczema (Vicharchika), and acne vulgaris (Yauvanpidika). Similarly, Sushruta Samhita described their properties as a cognition enhancer (Medhya) and reversal of certain cardiac (Hrid Roga), gastrointestinal (Udar Roga), and kidney-related problems (Randhawa and Sharma 2015; Steer 2019). The therapeutic potential of Panchgavya has been described in Apasmar-Chikitsa-Adhyaya of Charak Samhita with specific indications for cognitive and memory decline (Apasmar). It is also mentioned for the prevention of jaundice (Kamala), fever (Jwara), arthritis (Amavata), ulcer (Mukhapaka), asthma (Tamakaswasa), and brain disorder (Raut and Vaidya 2018). Similarly, cow bile has been described to treat a wide number of disorders in Traditional Chinese Medicine (Wang and Carey 2014).

Cow products in the modern pharmacopeia

In the prevailing trend toward natural bioactive products, there seems to be an increasing preference for different cow products associated with various perceived health benefits (Pereira et al. 2014; Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020). The active constituents of the cow milk, especially proteins (i.e., caseins, lactoferrin, and albumins), immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgE, and IgD), and cytokines (interleukins and interferon), have been widely used in the treatment of several physiological or metabolic disordered related to the brain, kidney, heart, and other organs (Watson et al. 2017). These active constituents have a significant protective influence on specific disease conditions of particular target organs by modulating signaling pathways and other elements (Mohanvel et al. 2017; Jawhara et al. 2020). Peptides derived from the digestion of cow proteins have demonstrated anticancer and antimutagenic properties, including mechanisms of DNA damage mitigation and apoptosis induction via both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways (Pepe et al. 2013; El‑Fakharany et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2019). Milk-derived extracellular vesicles contained several immunomodulatory miRNAs and membrane protein CD63, characteristics of exosomes (Pieters et al., 2015; Benmoussa et al., 2016). Panahipour et al. (2018) reported that pasteurized cow milk and the aqueous fractions of yogurt and buttermilk enhanced the expression of TGF-β target genes (IL11, NOX4, and PRG4) in gingival fibroblasts. Lactoferrin is a major iron-binding glycoprotein from cow milk known to have an immunomodulatory role, and recently, their immunocompetence efficacy has been emphasized against SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19 (Mann and Ndung 2020). The active constituents of cow urine prevent the free radical formation, act as bio-enhancer, reduce blood glucose, and efficiently repair the damaged DNA, thus showing anticancer and anti-diabetic efficacy (Dutta et al. 2006; Mohanvel et al. 2017). Recently, Padvi et al. (2020) suggested that cow urine mediated synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) can be used for antineoplastic therapy. The cow products also displayed inhibitory effects against various human pathogenic microorganisms (Randhawa and Sharma 2015; Hoh and Dhanashree 2017). Likewise, cow urine mediated synthesized CuO NPs, palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs), and silver oxide nanoparticles (Ag2ONPs) exhibit excellent antimicrobial activity against various strains of bacteria and fungi (Vinay et al. 2019; Prasad et al. 2020; Padvi et al. 2020). Table 4 summarizes the evidenced-based pharmacotherapeutic potential of different cow products and their possible action mechanism.
Table 4

The reported pharmacotherapeutic potential of different cow products and their mode of action

Pharmacotherapeutic potentialTypes of CPsUsed formPossible action mechanismReferences
AnticancerUrineUrine-derived copper oxide nanoparticlesUpsetting the levels of reactive oxygen species and apoptosisPadvi et al. 2020
Urine distillatePromoting cell apoptosis and repairing mechanism of damaged DNAMohanvel et al. 2017
Fresh urineReduction in tumor incidence, tumor yield, tumor burden, and cumulative number of papillomasRaja and Agrawal 2010
Redistilled urine distillateProtecting DNA strand break, chromosomal aberration, and micronucleus formationDutta et al. 2006
Milk and derived productMilk lactoferrinInduced cell cycle arrest at the G1 and G2 phases, activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathwaySharma et al. 2019
Milk cheddar cheesesConstrain nitric oxide production and augmented the cell population at G0/G1 phaseRafiq et al. 2018
Pasteurized and fermented milkEnhanced the expression of interleukin11 (IL11), proteoglycan4 (PRG4), and NADPH oxidase (NOX4)Panahipour et al. 2018
Clearfield butter oilAltering membrane lipid composition and downregulates the enzyme activities responsible for carcinogen activation in the liver( cyclooxygenase-2, PPAR-γ) and upregulates carcinogen detoxification activities in the liver (uridinediphospho-glucuronosyl transferase and quinone reductase) and mammary tissues(γ-glutamyltranspeptidase)Rani and Kansal 2011
AntidiabeticUrineUrine distillateReducing the level of elevated blood glucose and serum creatinineMahida et al. 2017
Urine arkIncreased peripheral glucose utilization and sensitivity of insulin receptors, and decreased glucose absorption from the intestineSachdev et al. 2012
Urine distillateReduction of the elevated blood glucose and serum cholesterolGururaja et al. 2011
 UrineFresh urineStimulate peripheral use of blood glucoseJarald et al. 2008
Milk and derived productsA1 and A2 casein hydrolysatesIncreased fasting blood glucose levels, blood biochemical and decrease in levels of insulin and C-peptideThakur et al. 2020
Fermented milk containing conjugated linoleic acidDecreased levels of fasting blood glucose, serum insulin, and leptin and increased oral glucose tolerance and insulin toleranceSong et al. 2016
 Antidiabetic Milk derived productsMilk derived yogurtInhibition of a-amylase and a-glucosidaseShori and Baba 2014
Anti-obesity and dyslipidemiaUrineUrine distillateReduction in dietary fat absorption by reducing the pancreatic lipase activity and enhancing their excretion in fecesKetan et al. 2020
Fresh and urine distillateReduced BMI, abdominal circumference, obesity index, atherogenic index, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, and VLDL-C while increased HDL-C levelSharma et al. 2017a, b
Fresh urineDecrease in body weight, BMI, abdominal circumference, serum triglyceride HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, and serum total cholesterolSaini 2016
Urine arkReduction in the serum level of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and VLDLManubhai et al. 2014
Fresh urineReduced the levels of the thiobarbituric acid reactive substanceLavania et al. 2011
 Anti-obesity and dyslipidemiaMilk and derived productsFermented milk containing conjugated linoleic acidDecreased concentrations of serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterolSong et al., 2016
ImmunomodulatoryUrineUrine distillateIncreased B and T cells proliferationAmbwani et al. 2018
Urine distillateMarginally up-regulated the heterophil, basophil, and monocytes proliferationTadavi et al. 2017
Urine distillateEnhancing neutrophil activityDurga et al. 2015
Fresh and urine distillateImproving B-cell blastogenesis, T-cell blastogenesis, serum IgG level, and serum IgM levelGanguly and Prasad 2010
Milk and derived productPowdered milkIncreasing immunoglobulin concentration (IgG and IgM), chitotriosidase activity, and complement system activityHernández-Castellano et al. 2015
Wound healing and anti-ulcer activityUrineUrine arkIncreasing granulation tissue formation and collagen contentHirapara et al. 2016
Urine distillateIntrusion of polymorphonuclear cells, neovascularization, and fibroblast proliferationMishra et al. 2009
Milk and derived productClearfield butterIncrease formation of keratinization, angiogenesis, fibrous tissue proliferation, and collagen formationPrasad and Dorle 2006
MilkUp and down-regulation of membrane receptors including prostaglandin E2 and histamine H2 receptorGespach et al. 1987
Neuro and brain-protectiveUrineFresh urineImproved levels of acetylcholinestrase (AChE)Sharma and Chadha 2016
PanchgavyaPanchgavya ghritaImproved levels of GABA and reduced levels of dopamine and plasma corticosteroneKumar et al. 2013
Panchgavya ghritaIncreased the spontaneous motor activityGosavi and Jhon 2012
Nephro-protectiveUrineUrine arkLower levels of urine oxalate, serum creatinine, blood urea, and CaOx depositions restored kidney weightShukla et al. 2013
The reported pharmacotherapeutic potential of different cow products and their mode of action

Health risk assessment

Studies on cow milk and other dairy products consumption have shown a controversial and complex effect on human health. For instance, lactose is the main carbohydrate present in cow milk which is further hydrolyzed into two isomeric forms, alpha, and beta by a b-galactosidase known as lactase (Schaafsma et al. 2008). Lactose intolerance or b-galactosidase deficiency is an overlay term, and more than 50% of the world population has persistent lactose intolerance. Lactose intolerance or b-galactosidase deficiency causes several gastrointestinal distresses like abdominal cramps and bloating, flatulence, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting (Matthews et al. 2005; Pereira 2014). Currently, there is also a growing concern about the consequences of cow milk β-caseins (A1 β-casein and A2 β-casein) on lactose intolerance (Brooke-Taylor et al. 2017; Daniloski et al. 2021). A1 β-casein generally contains a histidine amino residue at 67 positions, which is more likely to undergo enzymatic cleavage yielding in the product β-casomorphin-7 (BCM-7), a recognized μ-opioid receptor agonist. It has also been reported to exert various adverse effects on the gastrointestinal system (i.e., increased inflammation, worsening of post-dairy digestive discomfort symptoms, delayed transit, motility, etc.) in lactose tolerant and lactose intolerant subjects (Jianqin et al. 2015; Summer et al. 2020). While A2 β-casein contains a proline residue at this site and is unlikely to undergo enzymatic cleavage. It did not aggravate such gastrointestinal dysfunctions in subjects with lactose intolerance (He et al., 2017). Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that gastrointestinal symptoms of milk intolerance can be avoided by consuming milk containing only the A2 β-casein (Sheng et al. 2019; Ramakrishnan et al. 2020; Kay et al. 2021). Likewise, cow milk protein allergy can be associated with IgE reactions, and immediate reaction symptoms include anaphylaxis, edema, and much gastrointestinal distress such as vomiting, diarrhea, and bloody stools (Fiocchi et al. 2010). Some studies reinforce the role of cow milk and other milk-derived products as important nutrient sources, justifying their place in a healthy diet (Pereira 2014; Butter et al. 2017), whereas others suggest a possible association of milk consumption with increased risk for obesity, diabetes, osteoporosis, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (Holmberg et al. 2009; Tunick and Van Hekken 2015). Thorning et al. (2016) has performed a detailed meta-analysis study on milk, and dairy products suggested that intake of milk and dairy products contribute to meet nutrient recommendations and may protect against the most prevalent chronic diseases with the least adverse reports (Fig. 2). In addition, the presence of pesticide residues as well as heavy metals in milk and dairy products is well evidenced throughout the world, which can be responsible for many harmful effects on human health (Norouzirad et al. 2018; Jadhav et al. 2019).
Fig. 2

Overview on effects or association between dairy product intake and health outcomes. +  = favorable effect/association, * = no effect/association,—= adverse effect/association

Overview on effects or association between dairy product intake and health outcomes. +  = favorable effect/association, * = no effect/association,—= adverse effect/association

Cow products in agriculture management

Since human civilization, agricultural practices have played a strategic role in improving the availability of food and achieving food security. In the current scenario, global agricultural production is mainly associated with two major problems: first, environmental measures as floods, droughts, and variability in temperature or rainfall, secondly plant disease because plant pathogens are difficult to control as their population shows variability with time, space and genotype. The indiscriminate use of agrochemicals adversely affected soil fertility, crop productivity, and, more specifically, the environmental system is also a major bottleneck. In order to combat the losses caused by such factors, it is necessary to define the problem and seek eco-friendly remedies. Cow products, especially urine and dung, can be considered a low-cost agricultural practice for farmers and has been extensively used in traditional and modern agriculture practices like organic farming and hydroponics. Therefore, in sub-sections, we summarized the utilization of different cow products in areas ranging from plant disease control to yield attributes and soil sustainably.

Cow products in plant disease management

The agricultural harvests of food interest, mainly crops, vegetables, and fruits, are often seen to be infected by one or the group of pathogens and pests, causing a loss in yield and sometimes even the quality (Savary et al. 2012). One reason is that pathogens and pests have co-evolved with vegetation since the origin of the human-made agricultural system (Pathak et al. 2018). At a global scale, pathogens and pests are causing an average 30% yield losses in six most important food crop, including wheat (10–28%), rice (25–41%), maize (20–41%), potato (8–21%), and soybean (11–32%) losses (Savary et al. 2019). For millennia, cow urine and dung have been extensively used in traditional agriculture practices. There has been a spate of literature on these products, particularly concerning their use in the management of different diseases and harmful pests. It seems that the treatment combination of cow urine and cow dung shows marked effect on certain disease-causing phytopathogen through either a direct or indirect mechanism (Table 5). Apart from this, several green bio-formulations have been prepared by mixing ratio of either the dung or urine with distinct botanicals, which can be used as pest repellent in agricultural practices (Mandavgane et al. 2005; Kumawat et al. 2014). Agniastra is a natural bio-pesticide prepared by mixing up cow urine with neem leaf extract (Azadirachta indica) and ginger paste. Similarly, Neemastra is a board spectrum bio-pesticide commonly prepared by mixing up cow dung and cow urine with neem leaf extract and water. Its uses on crops provide the resistance to several pests and increase the overall crop productivity due to the immunostimulant stirring of the active principles in both the cow urine and neem leaf extract (Chaudhary et al. 2017; Rawat et al. 2020). Brhmastra and Dashaparniarka have also been prepared by mixing cow waste with multiple botanicals (i.e., Annona reticulata, Carica papaya, Punica granatum, Psidium guajava, etc.), and water. Its foliar applications have been reported to exert protection and strong repellence against sucking pests, pod/fruit borers, and some mosquitos (Soni and Yadav 2019; Middya et al. 2020). The research focuses on cow urine and cow dung microbiota, which possesses antagonistic effects against disease-causing pathogens and pests. Bacillus subtilis strains are the most predominant isolates from cow dung that have displayed adverse effects against phytopathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia bataticola, Fusarium soalni, and Fusarium oxysporum (Swain et al. 2012; Radha et al. 2014). Likewise, Lu et al. (2014) has investigated bacterial strains (belongs to genera Bacillus, Proteus, Providencia, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, and Microbacterium) from cow dung for nematicidal activity against two predominant nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and Meloidogyne incognita. The author revealed that most of the isolated strains displayed antagonistic activity against both the nematodes. Piasai and Sudsanguan (2018) have investigated four species of Gelasinospora isolated from cow dung against plant pathogenic fungi. It has been observed that all isolates of Gelasinospora inhibited mycelial growth of Phytophthora palmivora, Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum capsici, and Curvularia lunata. Streptomyces strains procured from cow dung have also displayed decent antagonistic activity against the strain of genera Aspergillus, Fusarium, Macrophomina, and Rhizoctonia solani (Semwal et al. 2018).
Table 5

Applications of cow products in biological control of various pathogen and pests

Used cow productsPathogens/pest and diseaseHost plantsDemonstration of activityReferences
Urine and Panchgavya (PG)Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.)Mustard5.0% of both urine and PG shows 80% and 96.67% mortality rateYadav and Tiwari 2020
UrineMeloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode)Tomato and eggplants10% concentration show 98.78% juvenile mortality and 75% egg hatching inhibition after 72 h of incubationGupta et al. 2020
UrinePhytophthora nicotianae var. parasitica (buckeye rot)TomatoThe highest mycelial growth inhibition (62.12%) was found at 15% concentrationShridhar et al. 2019
Fresh, photo-activated, and sterile urineAspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus sp., Alternaria sp., Mucor sp., Fusarium sp., and Penicillium sp.Wheat100% concentration was most effective for inhibition of mycelia growthGhosh et al. 2018
UrineSclerotium oryzae (stem rot)Rice5, 7.5, and 10.0% concentration resulted 100% mycelia growth inhibitionPrakash and Sinha 2017
Urine and dungColletotrichum falcatum (red rot)SugarcaneThe percentage mycelial growth inhibition found to be varied with time of incubation, and it was maximum after 5 days of incubationPatel et al. 2016
Urine concentrateFusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotium rolfsii (Damping-off and wilting)Methi (Trigonella foenumgraecum) and Bhindi (Abelmoschus esculentus)The growth retardation of F. oxysporum, R. solani, and S. rolfsii was 78.57%, 78.37%, and 73.84% at 15% urine concentration, respectivelyJandaik et al. 2015
UrineAlternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Glomerella cingulata, Monilinia fructigena, and Penicillium expansum (post-harvest rot)ApplesUrine based bio formulations resulted in 84.7% reduction in the post-harvest rot after 75 days of storage at 4 °CTomar and Raj 2015
UrineFusarium lateritium (Fusarium bark)Coffea arabicaUndiluted urine show marked inhibitory effect on conidial germination, germ tube length, mycelial growth rate, and sporulationGotora et al. 2014
UrineXanthomonas oryzae (bacterial leaf blight)PaddyShowed 10 to 13 mm zone of inhibitionMurugan et al. 2012
Urine and buttermilkRhizoctonia bataticola (charcoal rot), Sclerotium rolfsii (collar rot) and Fusarium solani (root rot)SoybeanReduced mycelial growth, number, and size of sclerotia with increasing urine concentration, while mycelial growth and number of sclerotia of R. bataticola were completely inhibited at 500 and 1000 ppm of buttermilkSapre and Verma 2006
Urine and dungFusarium solani (root rot)CucumberHighest inhibition of conidial germination (%) was found after 2 h of incubation, while highest mycelial growth inhibition (%) was found after 7 days of incubation of both urine and dungBasak et al. 2002
Applications of cow products in biological control of various pathogen and pests

Cow products in plant growth, yield, and nutrient attributes

Toward a food security vision, crops need to be equipped with better growth, yield, and nutritional properties (Gimenez et al. 2018). To fulfill the above-desired crop characteristic, one possibility is to use products that themselves have to boost means and can strengthen plant health and yields (Raklami et al. 2019). Cow products are the rich source of various inorganic and organic substances, which can regulate plants' physiological and biochemical mechanisms (Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020). Different cow products and their formulations, such as Panchgavya, Beejamrut, Amritpaani, etc., have been extensively evaluated to sustain agricultural production in terms of growth, yield, and nutritional qualities of the crop plants (Table 6). Panchgavya is well-recognized liquid manure for this purpose, while Beejamrut and Amritpaani are considered good sources for plant growth stimulation (Barar et al. 2019). Generally, these formulations have been prepared by thoroughly mixing cow dung, cow urine, and other ingredients. Its uses on crops increase crop plants’ overall biological efficiency, quality, and yield (Aswani et al. 2020; Dodamani et al. 2020). The treatment combination of such liquid organic inputs with other bio-formulations has shown encouraging results in reducing the overall cost of crop cultivation practices (Tripura et al. 2018). In the recent past, the focus has also shifted towards cow waste as a potential source for plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPBs) which have active compounds of multifarious importance for plant growth promotion(Girija et al. 2013; Bhatt and Maheshwari 2019). Several strains of PGPBs have been isolated from cow dung and explored to augment and boost plant biological, functional, and nutritional assets (Lin et al. 2018; Bhatt and Maheshwari 2020).
Table 6

Applications of cow products on plant growth, yield, and nutrient attributes

Name of plants/cropsApplied cow productsMode of application and outcomesReference
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)PanchagavyaFoliar application of 3% panchagavya significantly improved plant height and seed yieldMeyyappan and Sivakumar 2020
Chinese white cabbage (Bok choy)DungPlants under cow dung amended soil significantly increased total leaf sugar, vitamin C, polyphenols, total protein, and amino acids contentKaleri et al. 2020
Tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.)Dung biocharApplied via soil(10 t ha−1), improved growth and yieldAdekiya et al. 2020
Balsam (Impatiens balsamina)PanchagavyaPre-soaking application (24 h) of 2% panchagavya solution show improved germination, shoot, and root lengthKumar et al. 2020
MaizePanchagavyaApplied via soil, increased physio-morphological(root and shoot length up to 10–21%) and biochemical properties(chlorophyll, total carotenoids, antioxidative enzymes, and total protein)Praburaman et al. 2020
RiceUrineFoliar application (4 sprays) of 4.4% and 10% urine concentrate positively enhance various growth and yield attributesSadhukhan et al. 2019
Rosmarinus officinalis (Rosemary)Urine, dung slurry, and buttermilkApplied via pre-sowing seed treatments, urine (5–15% concentration) and dung slurry applications show increased seed germination (%), while buttermilk had an adverse effectSharma et al. 2019
Passion fruit (Passiflora edulis)UrineApplied via soil, increased the leaf area and quality indexes of seedlingsFreire and Nascimento 2018
Custard apple (Annona squamosal)UrineSoaking application of 20% urine concentration show improved survival percentage of seedlings and seedling vigor indexYadav et al. 2018
WheatUrineFoliar application of 75% and 100% urine solution show 18.01% and 27.21% higher grain yield, respectively, over controlSadhukhan et al. 2018
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)PanchagavyaFoliar application of 4% panchagavya significantly enhance the number of nodules, the weight of nodules, seed and stover yield as well as economicsPanchal et al. 2017
PigeonpeaUrineFoliar application of 4% urine solution significantly increased plant height, number of branches, leaf area, dry weight, seed yield, and harvest indexYogita et al. 2017
BhindiPanchagavyaFoliar application of 3% panchgavya solution enhanced physio-chemical(number of fruit, fresh weight, dry weight) and biochemical properties(chlorophyll and carotenoid content)Rakesh et al. 2017
CucumberUrineUrine with bio-fertilizers show positive effect on yield, growth and quality parameter and reduced at least 50% of water requirementKumar et al. 2017
Stevia rebaudianaDungApplied via soil (5–10 t ha–1), increased growth characteristic, and leaf biomass yieldZaman et al. 2017
MustardUrineIncreasing levels of urine application (up to 900 l/ha) markedly improved growth parameters, yield attributes, and nutrient uptakePradhan et al. 2016
Rose (Rosa hybrida)Urine1–3% concentration positively enhance flowering, quality, and yield characteristicsBaghele et al. 2016
Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensisPanchagavyaPre-soaking and foliar applications of 33% and 100% panchagavya increased germination and growthAnandham et al. 2015
Methi and BhindiUrine5% concentration significantly improved morpho-physiological (leaf length, leaf area, root length, plant height), biochemical (protein, carbohydrates, and chlorophyll) parameters of both plantsJandaik et al. 2015
MaizeUrine and PanchagavyaHigher grain and stover yield, plant height, and number of leaves with both panchagavya and cow urine, comparable to fertilizer treatments at the higher level (200% and 300%)Devakumar et al. 2014
Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo)UrineFoliar application of 5% urine significantly improved fresh matter, and the number of total commercial fruit/plantde Oliveira et al. 2013
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)PanchagavyaSoaking application (10 ml/kg), enhanced length of root and shoot, dry mass leaf area, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic activityAmalraj et al. 2013
TomatoUrineImproved plant height and dry matter accumulation at a concentration below 8.23%Belan et al. 2013
SoybeanUrineFoliar application of 6% urine solution significantly enhanced morpho-physiological (leaf area, dry matter, plant height), biochemical (chlorophyll, protein), and yield contributing parameters(number of pods, seed weight, seed yield)Deotale et al. 2011
LettuceUrineImproved vegetative characteristics (i.e. fresh and dry mass of leaf, stem, and root) and commercial yield when urine solution applied at 1.25% to leaves or 1.0% to soilde Oliveira et al. 2009
GroundnutUrineFoliar application of 4% urine solution significantly enhanced morpho-physiological parameters such as plant height, number of branches, leaf area, total dry matter production, and pod yield hectareDeotale et al. 2008
Applications of cow products on plant growth, yield, and nutrient attributes

Cow products in the management of soil sustainability

Since the green revolution, indiscriminate and disproportionate uses of agrochemicals like chemical fertilizer and pesticide resulted severe threat to soil sustainability (Elbana et al. 2019). Both the cow urine and dung contain significant amounts of major nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) required for soil mineral balance and fertility. Singh et al. (2014) has reported that high dose of cow urine application resulted in increased dissolved nutrients of amended soils. Significantly higher soil organic carbon and available N, P, and K were obtained with the applications of cow urine with other formulations (Kgasudi et al. 2020). On the other hand, cow dung has been considered as low-cost natural fertilizer because it supplements good organic matter (Mukhuba et al. 2018). Jeevamrut is a natural liquid fertilizer prepared by mixing cow dung and cow urine with other ingredients (i.e. jaggery, legume flour, etc.). It contains the huge count of microbial load that enriches the biological and mineral balance of the soil (Pathak and Ram 2013; Boraiah et al. 2017; Jain et al. 2021). Similarly, cow dung and cow urine-based compost are one of the most significant and frequently used organic matter in integrated soil management practices. Research shows that compost applications improve the nutritional balance of the soil and the soil texture and structure (Iwuagwu et al. 2019; Nguyen et al. 2020; Shafique et al. 2021). Ghana Jeevamrutham is the solid or granular form of Jeevamrut and also acts as natural fertilizer. It is a low-cost improvised preparation that enriches the soil with beneficial microfunna. The treatment of Ghana Jeevamrutham in balanced forms has improved soil fertility and maintained various crops’ nutritional quality (Sawant et al. 2019; Barar et al. 2019). Research interest is also given to the indigenous microbial diversity of cow dung as they can transform soil nutrient profiles via processes like solubilization, chelation, mineralization, and oxidation or reduction (Radha et al. 2014; Bhatt and Maheshwari 2019; Aiysha and Latif 2019). Recently, Adekiya et al. (2020) has reported that cow dung biochar application improves the nutritional profiles (soil pH, organic carbon, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, moisture contents) and the culturable microflora of the soils.

Cow products in other sustainable uses

Cow products displayed miscellaneous applications in some other valuable aspects like bioenergy production and pollution reduction, which are described below under sub-sections. To respect the length of the paper, the detailed outcomes of respected studies are avoided in this paper, while interested readers may refer to cited documents. In addition, summarized result of the case study report on cow product-based manufacturing unit (Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020) is pictorially presented in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Valorization of cow urine and dung based manufacturing unit

Valorization of cow urine and dung based manufacturing unit

Bioenergy production

Ever-increasing energy demands for day-to-day human activities such as transportation and industrial practices have depleted the non-renewal energy source and caused drastic environmental intrusions (Joshi et al. 2019; Halkos et al. 2020). Renewable energy in the form of biofuels and biogas offers the opportunity to improve access to modern energy services for the global community (Achinas et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2017b; Joshi et al. 2020). For long, caked or dried cow dung has traditionally been used by households as cooking fuels in many parts of the developing world. In the last two decades, there has been increasing research interest in bioenergy production, especially biogas using cow dung as substrate (Gupta et al. 2016; Mandavgane and Kulkarni 2020). On average, 1 kg of cow dung can produce 35–40 l of biogas (Kalia and Singh 2004), while dung generated from 3 to 5 cattle/day can run an 8–10 m3 biogas plant which can produce 1.5–2 m3 biogases per day. Research also continues to enhance biogas production via the use of additives, recycling of slurry and slurry filtrate, variation in operational parameters (i.e., temperature, hydraulic retention time, and particle size of the substrate), and use of fixed-film/biofilters (Li et al. 2014; Haryanto et al. 2018; Adekunle et al. 2019; Obileke et al. 2020). Activated carbon has also been synthesized from cow dung by a modified chemical activation method. The synthesized activated carbon reflects excellent properties like a supercapacitor with a distinct electrochemical application (Li et al. 2018; Ramalingam et al. 2020). Some recent studies also suggest that cow dung can be converted into an electrode material for energy conversion systems such as Li-ion batteries and fuel cells (Feng et al. 2018; Thiruselvi et al. 2020).

Bioremediation of pollutants

Bioremediation using microbes is a widely accepted method for the removal of hazardous environmental pollutants (Giovanella et al. 2020). Hydrocarbon and heavy metals are the major pollutants in water as well soil and pose a serious threat to living creatures and environments (Wang et al. 2020). Literature suggests that the cow dung contains a diverse group of microorganisms capable of biodegradation of hydrocarbons into environmentally friendly elements (Aghalibe et al. 2017; Varjani et al. 2017; Neethu et al. 2019). Another practical application of cow dung microorganisms is in the remediation of heavy metals like chromium, strontium, and arsenic (Wang et al., 2017). Many cow dung strains have been applied to biodegrade biomedical and pharmaceutical waste (Randhawa and Kullar 2011; Patil et al. 2019). Cow dung ash (CDA) has also been explored as a low-cost adsorbent to remove textile dyes and other organic contaminants (Ahmad et al. 2020). Recently, cow urine mediated synthesized silver oxide (Ag2O) nanoparticles show good photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (Vinay et al. 2019).

Conclusion and future prospectus

The present review deals with the first comprehensive outlook on cow products to human health and food security, the prime most concern among United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The nutritional richness of cow milk and other dairy products is unquestionable; they are a good source of high biological value substances with polyvalent roles in immune function, as well as pharmacological actions. Understanding the mechanisms enabling their biological process can promote novel applications in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical sectors. Cow excreta like urine and dung contains distinct compounds for human interest and is an effective tool to sustain agriculture production via governing soil sustainability, plant health, and yield attributes. The application of cow urine and dung microflora potential can promote both human health and plant health; however, comprehensive screening of these microorganisms for the production of virtuous antimicrobials, enzymes, and metabolites needed to be investigated. It is undoubtedly evident that more detailed studies of cow products are required, as there is still tremendous scope for advancing research and development to novel applications in various fields of science and technology, including bioenergy and pollution abatement in a green and clean manner.
  68 in total

Review 1.  Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem.

Authors:  S B Matthews; J P Waud; A G Roberts; A K Campbell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Metal and organic pollutants bioremediation by extremophile microorganisms.

Authors:  Patricia Giovanella; Gabriela A L Vieira; Igor V Ramos Otero; Elisa Pais Pellizzer; Bruno de Jesus Fontes; Lara D Sette
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Speciation of heavy metals and bacteria in cow dung after vermicomposting by the earthworm, Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Wei Han; Xiaoyun Wang; Hongmei Chen; Fen Zhu; Xiaoping Wang; Chaoliang Lei
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Removal of methylene blue dye using rice husk, cow dung and sludge biochar: Characterization, application, and kinetic studies.

Authors:  Anees Ahmad; Nawaz Khan; Balendu Shekher Giri; Pankaj Chowdhary; Preeti Chaturvedi
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  The Use of Human, Bovine, and Camel Milk Albumins in Anticancer Complexes with Oleic Acid.

Authors:  Esmail M El-Fakharany; Marwa M Abu-Serie; Ekaterina A Litus; Sergei E Permyakov; Eugene A Permyakov; Vladimir N Uversky; Elrashdy M Redwan
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Commercial cow milk contains physically stable extracellular vesicles expressing immunoregulatory TGF-β.

Authors:  Bartijn C H Pieters; Onno J Arntz; Miranda B Bennink; Mathijs G A Broeren; Arjan P M van Caam; Marije I Koenders; Peter L E M van Lent; Wim B van den Berg; Marieke de Vries; Peter M van der Kraan; Fons A J van de Loo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Milk Containing A2 β-Casein ONLY, as a Single Meal, Causes Fewer Symptoms of Lactose Intolerance than Milk Containing A1 and A2 β-Caseins in Subjects with Lactose Maldigestion and Intolerance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Monica Ramakrishnan; Tracy K Eaton; Omer M Sermet; Dennis A Savaiano
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Chemotherapeutic potential of cow urine: A review.

Authors:  Gurpreet Kaur Randhawa; Rajiv Sharma
Journal:  J Intercult Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2015-03-07

9.  Effects of milk containing only A2 beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on gastrointestinal physiology, symptoms of discomfort, and cognitive behavior of people with self-reported intolerance to traditional cows' milk.

Authors:  Sun Jianqin; Xu Leiming; Xia Lu; Gregory W Yelland; Jiayi Ni; Andrew J Clarke
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.