Literature DB >> 34891864

Automatic Segmentation of Mandibular Ramus and Condyles.

Celia Le, Romain Deleat-Besson, Juan Prieto, Serge Brosset, Maxime Dumont, Winston Zhang, Lucia Cevidanes, Jonas Bianchi, Antonio Ruellas, Liliane Gomes, Marcela Gurgel, Camila Massaro, Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo, Marilia Yatabe, Erika Benavides, Fabiana Soki, Najla Al Turkestani, Karine Evangelista, Joao Goncalves, Jose Valladares-Neto, Maria Alves Garcia Silva, Cauby Chaves, Fabio Costa, Daniela Garib, Heesoo Oh, Jonathan Gryak, Martin Styner, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin, Beatriz Paniagua, Kayvan Najarian, Reza Soroushmehr.   

Abstract

In order to diagnose TMJ pathologies, we developed and tested a novel algorithm, MandSeg, that combines image processing and machine learning approaches for automatically segmenting the mandibular condyles and ramus. A deep neural network based on the U-Net architecture was trained for this task, using 109 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The ground truth label maps were manually segmented by clinicians. The U-Net takes 2D slices extracted from the 3D volumetric images. All the 3D scans were cropped depending on their size in order to keep only the mandibular region of interest. The same anatomic cropping region was used for every scan in the dataset. The scans were acquired at different centers with different resolutions. Therefore, we resized all scans to 512×512 in the pre-processing step where we also performed contrast adjustment as the original scans had low contrast. After the pre-processing, around 350 slices were extracted from each scan, and used to train the U-Net model. For the cross-validation, the dataset was divided into 10 folds. The training was performed with 60 epochs, a batch size of 8 and a learning rate of 2×10-5. The average performance of the models on the test set presented 0.95 ± 0.05 AUC, 0.93 ± 0.06 sensitivity, 0.9998 ± 0.0001 specificity, 0.9996 ± 0.0003 accuracy, and 0.91 ± 0.03 F1 score. This study findings suggest that fast and efficient CBCT image segmentation of the mandibular condyles and ramus from different clinical data sets and centers can be analyzed effectively. Future studies can now extract radiomic and imaging features as potentially relevant objective diagnostic criteria for TMJ pathologies, such as osteoarthritis (OA). The proposed segmentation will allow large datasets to be analyzed more efficiently for disease classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34891864      PMCID: PMC8994041          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 2375-7477


  14 in total

1.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

3.  Semi-Automated Three-Dimensional Condylar Reconstruction.

Authors:  Irene Méndez-Manjón; Orion Luiz Haas; Raquel Guijarro-Martínez; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Adaia Valls-Ontañón; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from CBCT images.

Authors:  Yi Fan; Richard Beare; Harold Matthews; Paul Schneider; Nicky Kilpatrick; John Clement; Peter Claes; Anthony Penington; Christopher Adamson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: diagnosis and long-term conservative management: a topic review.

Authors:  Mythili Kalladka; Samuel Quek; Gary Heir; Eli Eliav; Muralidhar Mupparapu; Archana Viswanath
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-09-22

6.  Comparing different planimetric methods on volumetric estimations by using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Alaettin Koç; Ömer Said Sezgin; Saadettin Kayıpmaz
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ruo-Han Ma; Gang Li; Shuang Yin; Yi Sun; Zi-Li Li; Xu-Chen Ma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  3D Auto-Segmentation of Mandibular Condyles.

Authors:  Serge Brosset; Maxime Dumont; Jonas Bianchi; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Joao Goncalves; Erika Benavides; Fabiana Soki; Beatriz Paniagua; Juan Prieto; Kayvan Najarian; Jonathan Gryak; Reza Soroushmehr
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2020-07

9.  A novel region-growing based semi-automatic segmentation protocol for three-dimensional condylar reconstruction using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Authors:  Tong Xi; Ruud Schreurs; Wout J Heerink; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Imaging modalities for temporomandibular joint disorders: an update.

Authors:  Daniel Talmaceanu; Lavinia Manuela Lenghel; Nicolae Bolog; Mihaela Hedesiu; Smaranda Buduru; Horatiu Rotar; Mihaela Baciut; Grigore Baciut
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.