Literature DB >> 34890694

Simultaneous EUS-guided portosystemic pressure measurement and liver biopsy sampling correlate with clinically meaningful outcomes.

Kaveh Hajifathalian1, Donevan Westerveld1, Alyson Kaplan1, Enad Dawod1, Andrea Herr1, Mallory Ianelli1, Allysa Saggese1, Sonal Kumar1, Brett E Fortune1, Reem Z Sharaiha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The measurement of the portosystemic pressure gradient (PSG) in patients with advanced liver disease is helpful to assess the severity of portal hypertension (PH) and predict adverse clinical outcomes. EUS-guided PSG (EUS-PSG) measurement is a novel tool to assess PSG in all patients with advanced liver disease. We sought to assess the safety, feasibility, and technical success of simultaneous EUS-PSG measurement and EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling using a single-center experience.
METHODS: Patients with suspected liver disease or cirrhosis were enrolled prospectively from 2020 to 2021. EUS-PSG was measured by calculating the difference between the mean portal pressure and the mean hepatic vein pressure. PH was defined as PSG >5 mm Hg and clinically significant PH as PSG ≥10 mm Hg. The primary outcomes were procedural technical success rate and correlation of EUS-PSG with fibrosis stage obtained from concurrent EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling and the correlation of EUS-PSG with patients' imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings. The secondary outcome was occurrence of procedural adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in the study. PSG measurement and EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling were successful in 23 patients (technical success rate of 96%) and 24 patients (100% success), respectively. Analysis revealed a significant association between both PSG and liver stiffness measured on transient elastography (P = .011) and fibrosis-4 score (P = .026). No significant correlation was found between the fibrosis stage on histology and measured PSG (P = .559). One mild AE of abdominal pain was noted. Additionally, EUS-PSG was predictive of clinically evident PH.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous EUS-PSG measurement and EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling were both feasible and safe and correlated with clinically evident PH and noninvasive markers of fibrosis.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34890694     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  3 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in vascular interventions: Where are we now?

Authors:  Alessandro Fugazza; Kareem Khalaf; Matteo Colombo; Silvia Carrara; Marco Spadaccini; Glenn Koleth; Edoardo Troncone; Roberta Maselli; Alessandro Repici; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 2.  Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

Authors:  Shiva Rangwani; Devarshi R Ardeshna; Khalid Mumtaz; Sean G Kelly; Samuel Y Han; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 3.  Bibliometric-analysis visualization and review of non-invasive methods for monitoring and managing the portal hypertension.

Authors:  XiaoHan Sun; Hong Bo Ni; Jian Xue; Shuai Wang; Afaf Aljbri; Liuchun Wang; Tian Hang Ren; Xiao Li; Meng Niu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.