Health care providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission to newborns is one of the basic components of perinatal care in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, scientific evidence is compulsory for evidence-based practices. However, there was a scarcity of evidence on health care providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia, particularly in the study setting.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed at assessing healthcare providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors among healthcare providers in northwest Ethiopia, 2021.
METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 405 healthcare providers working in hospitals of Gondar province from November 15, 2020, to March 10, 2021. A simple random sampling technique was employed to select the study subjects. Data were collected via a structured-self-administered questionnaire. EPI INFO version 7.1.2 and SPSS version 25 were used for data entry and analysis respectively. Binary logistic regression analyses were done to identify associated factors and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) at a p-value of <0.05 was used to declare significant association.
RESULTS: The healthcare providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was 40.7% (95% CI: 35.9, 45.6). Working in a tertiary hospital (AOR = 3.69; 95% CI: 2.24, 6.08), using COVID-19 guideline updates (AOR = 3.34; 95% CI: 2.1, 5.3), being trained on COVID-19 (AOR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.74, 4.47), owning a smartphone and/or a computer (AOR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.39, 3.68), and perceiving that COVID-19 is dangerous (AOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.01) were factors positively associated with healthcare providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the pandemic of COVID-19.
CONCLUSION: Only two in five healthcare providers were aware of recommendations on breastfeeding practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and related to information of accessibility information on COVID-19. Therefore, expanding COVID-19 related information through the provision of COVID-19 training and guidelines to all levels of hospitals would improve health care providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction

The postnatal period is a critical time for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1]. Despite the risk of COVID-19 transmission to the neonate, the benefits of breastfeeding and mother-baby interaction remains essential practice to prevent infection, and promote health and development [2, 3]. Initiation of exclusive breastfeeding within the first hour of birth and skin-to-skin contact with the proper application of preventive measures are integral elements of breastfeeding care during the COVID-19 pandemic [4-6]. Newborns will acquire SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory system corona virus-2) from their infected mothers, caregivers, and/or the environment [7], mainly through respiratory droplets [8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes breast milk as the best source of infant nutrition regardless of maternal COVID-19 status [4, 9, 10]. Studies have shown that breast milk from mothers infected with COVID-19 does not cause infection and there is no evidence that the virus is transmitted through breastfeeding [11, 12]. In fact, empirical evidence suggests that breastfeeding might protect the baby against COVID-19 infection even babies born to COVID-19 positive women [13-15], although the possibility of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is inconclusive [16]. Hence, mothers with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 status are strongly encouraged to initiate and continue breastfeeding and should be counseled that the benefit of breastfeeding outweighs the potential risks of transmission as long as there is no evidence of transmission of COVID-19 through breastfeeding [17, 18]. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [8], the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) [6], Save the Children [5], and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) [19, 20] suggest breastfeeding for women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 status.

The Chinese neonatal novel Coronavirus 2 Expert Group has proposed temporary isolation of newborns at risk for COVID19 [21]. But the latest WHO guidelines indicate that isolation of newborns and their mothers with actual COVID-19 or suspicious COVID19 is unnecessary [4]. Evidence affirmed that isolating newborns for the sake of COVID-19 prevention is harmful [9, 22–25]. As far as the mother is able to care for her baby [4, 26] and the newborn’s clinical condition warrants no admission [4, 8], the baby should stay with the mother practicing skin-to-skin contact, and rooming-in. If the mother is seriously ill and has difficulty directly breastfeeding her baby due to COVID-19 expressed breast milk can be given [25]. Other options like re-lactation, wet nursing, and breastfeeding from donors are safe [9, 25–27]. All women with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, and/or symptomatic women who choose to breastfeed should take appropriate precautions for hand, breast, and respiratory hygiene [4, 21]. Besides, the number of care providers with babies should be minimized [21, 28] and women whose newborns have suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should get breastfeeding counseling, basic psychosocial support, and practical feeding support [27].

Obviously, the COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting the usual life in all sectors all over the world. One of the highly affected COVID-19 affected sectors is maternity services, where there have been significant disruptions and changes in light of service provision. One of the key components of maternity service which require clear guideline for consistent practices across settings breastfeeding practice amid COVID-19 and these guidelines have been indeed prepared based on the best available evidence generated so far. So, generating representative and ongoing evidence remains a mainstay of a roadmap in this perspective [29, 30]. Empirical evidence showcases that there is non-evidence-based and dilemmatic breastfeeding practice in the era of COVID-19 pandemic in resource-limited countries [2]. In addition, healthcare providers may find themselves in ethically difficult situations as they may be going against recommended practices [3]. In this case, perinatal care providers must be familiar with the recommended guidelines and current evidence of global organizations to be able to provide practical, mother-sensitive, and person-centered support [31].

However, empirical evidence on HCP’s awareness of breastfeeding care during the pandemic of COVID-19 is scarce. A descriptive cross-sectional survey in India revealed that 54% of the participants were familiar with WHO recommendations for breastfeeding practices. On the other hand, 15% of participants were completely unaware of WHO’s recommendations for breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic [32]. Another descriptive cross-sectional survey showed that 80% of nursing officers and 58% of medical officers knew that mothers with suspected or positive COVID-19 can give expressed breast milk for infants [33].

Although Ethiopian practice guidelines for childbirth care during the COVID-19 pandemic are in agreement with the WHO recommendations, there is little evidence regarding awareness of HCPs to breastfeeding practice recommendations during the pandemic of COVID-19 [34]. Thus, investigating HCPs’ awareness of WHO recommendations on breastfeeding practices is helpful to identify knowledge gaps and to take corrective actions for consistent implementation of the recommendations and prevention of COVID-19 transmission to neonates. Despite this fact, there was no literature in this regard in Ethiopia to date to the authors’ best knowledge. Having this evidence in mind, we conceive and conducted the current scientific study. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the HCPs’ awareness of WHO’s recommendations on breastfeeding practice during the pandemic of COVID-19 and associated factors in hospitals of Gondar province, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study design, period, and settings

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in Gondar province hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia from November 15, 2020, to March 10, 2021. The Gondar province includes South Gondar, Central Gondar, West Gondar, and North Gondar administrative zones with an estimated 5,137,443 total population. There are 22 Governmental hospitals in the Gondar province (two comprehensive specialized hospitals, one general hospital, and 19 primary hospitals). These hospitals are serving a population of more than 10 million in the province and the surrounding administrative zones such as the North Wollo, Waghimra, and Wolkait-Tegede, and Setit-Humera.

Study population and inclusion criteria

All healthcare providers (i.e. midwives, medical doctors, and integrated emergency surgical officers) working at the maternity centers of the selected hospitals were the study population. Healthcare providers who were available during the data collection period and willing to participate were included.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula considering the following assumptions: 95% confidence level, 50% provider’s awareness regarding breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic (since there were no similar studies), and 5% margin of error.

. By considering a 10% non-response rate, a final sample size of 422 was obtained. Data were collected from 15 hospitals (two comprehensive specialized hospitals, one general hospital, and 12 primary hospitals). The sampling frame was designed after receiving the list of healthcare providers of each hospital. The total sample size was then proportionally allocated to each selected hospital based on the number of perinatal healthcare providers they have. Finally, a simple random sampling technique was used to choose the study subjects.

Variables of the study

Dependent variable

Healthcare providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Independent variables

Socio-demographic variables: age, sex, marital status, religion, educational level, possession of smartphones and/ or computers, watching television (TV), reading newspapers, and monthly income.

Workplace and profession-related variables: working experience, professional category, the type of the hospital, attending COVID-19 training, receiving essential newborn care training, and location of the hospital.

Measurements

The awareness of HCPs to breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was measured as a composite of 10 questions having a “Yes” or “No” response. A score of “1” was given for “Yes” and a score of “0” was given for “No”. Consequently, a maximum of 10 and a minimum of 0 scores were obtained. After that, the mean value of the summative score was computed and determined (5.76). Using the mean awareness score as a cut-off point, HCPs who scored above the mean value were considered as being “aware” and those who scored just or below the mean score were considered as being “not aware”. Likewise, the HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was dichotomized as being aware (which was coded as “1”) and not aware (which was coded as “0”) [33].

Data collection tools, methods, and procedures

A structured questionnaire was prepared based on the WHO breastfeeding practice recommendations and related literature [4, 9, 10, 24, 25, 27]. A group of researchers has seen the suitability of the questionnaire and the alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the tool, which became 0.803. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises socio-demographic characteristics, professional and work-related characteristics, and questions assessing the healthcare providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 20 individuals have participated in the data collection and supervision process. That is 15 diploma and 5 BSc midwives.

Data quality control

Before the actual data collection, a pretest was conducted on 5% of the calculated sample size outside of the study area and data from the pretest was not included in the main study. A three days’ training was given on the overall data collection process and safety measures during the data collection. The questionnaire was checked for completeness by the principal investigator and the supervisors throughout the data collection process.

Data processing and analysis

Data were entered using EPI INFO version 7.1.2 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Frequency tables, texts, and graphs were used to present descriptive and analytic statistics. Numbers and percentages were used to describe categorical variables. The binary logistic regression (bivariable and multivariable) model was fitted. Variables with a p-value of < 0.25 in the bivariable regression were entered into the multivariable logistic regression analysis and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% CI and a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to declare a significant association with awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multicollinearity assumption was checked and it was acceptable with a variance inflation factor of <10.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board (IRB) of the University of Gondar (Reference number: V/P/RCS/05/413/2020) and a letter of permission for administrative approval was acquired from each selected hospital. Written informed consent was taken from each of the study participants after a clear explanation of the aim of the study was given.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 405 healthcare providers were included, with a 95.97% response rate. About two hundred seventy-one (66.9%) of the study participants were males and a greater number (59.5%) of HCPs were married. The mean age of the study participants was 28.4 years (SD ±4.7). The mean average monthly income of HCPs was 5862.6 (SD ±1948.5) Ethiopian Birr (ETB) (.

Workplace and profession-related characteristics

Of the total HCPs, two hundred forty-three (60%) were BSc midwifery professionals and 54.8% of them were working in urban hospitals. About two-thirds (65.4%) of them had more than three years of working experience (.

Awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19

The healthcare providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was 40.7% (95% CI: 35.9, 45.6). When HCPs were asked about the breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic, more than half (51.4%) knew that skin-to-skin contact is encouraged, but two-thirds (66.4%) of them did not know rooming-in is recommended. About 222 (54.8%) of HCPs knew that the benefit of breastfeeding outweighs its risk (.

Factors associated with healthcare providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that healthcare providers who were working in a tertiary hospital, had a smartphone and/or computer, perceiving that COVID-19 is dangerous, trained on COVID-19, and following the WHO and/or CDC COVID-19 updates were found to be significantly associated with HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

HCPs working in a tertiary hospital were 3.69 (AOR = 3.69; 95% CI: 2.24, 6.08) times more likely to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic than those HCPs working in a primary hospital. Besides, HCPs with a smartphone and/or computer were 2.26 times more likely to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic than HCPs without a smartphone and/or computer (AOR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.39, 3.68).

Similarly, the odds of being aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was 1.78 (AOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.01) times higher among HCPs who perceived that COVID-19 is dangerous compared with their counterparts. Moreover, HCPs who received COVID-19 training had 2.78 times more odds of awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations than the untrained counterparts (AOR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.74, 4.47). Furthermore, the likelihood of awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was three times higher among HCPs who were regularly followed the WHO and CDC COVID-19 updates compared with that of those who did not so (AOR = 3.34; 95% CI: 2.10, 5.30) (.

Discussion

Proper counseling to prevent COVID-19 in newborns and the implementation of precautions by health care providers are crucial components of perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic [7, 14]. In this context, the assessment of HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic plays a key role. Thus, this cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors among HCPs in Gondar province, Northwest Ethiopia. Accordingly, two-fifths of the HCPs were aware of the breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Working in a tertiary hospital, owning a smartphone and/or a computer, perceiving that COVID-19 is dangerous, being trained on COVID-19, and using the WHO and/or CDC COVID-19 updates were significant predictors of HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This study found that the HCPs’ awareness of the breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was 40.7%, which is lower than a report from India-54.1% [32]. The discrepancy might be due to differences in the study population. The Indian study was done among specialists such as pediatricians (85.1%), and obstetricians (14.9%). In contrast, the majority of our study participants were midwifery professionals and BSc degree holders. Specialists are top consultants in inpatient care, so better knowledge from specialists is expected. In this regard, it is highly recommended that all healthcare providers, regardless of education level, be aware of important breastfeeding recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, a higher awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 was identified in some of the questions by HCPs. Thus, nearly three-quarters (73.8%) of HCPs were aware of a mother with COVID-19 can give expressed breast milk if she is too ill to directly breastfeed her newborn. Because it is highly recommended that a woman can give her baby expressed breast milk even if she is too ill and unable to breastfeed directly [25]. Besides, about 73.1% of HCPs aware of breastfeeding should be initiated within one hour after delivery. As long as a woman can breastfeed her newborn, breastfeeding should be initiated within 30 to 60 minutes as usual regardless of the woman’s COVID-19 status. On the other hand, only a third (33.6%) and one-fifth (21%) of HCPs recognize rooming-in and the need for routine precaution for women suspected or confirmed COVID-19. This urges concerned bodies and health policymakers to provide updated information and arrange training opportunities for HCPs regarding breastfeeding practices during the COVID-19 pandemic regularly. This will help HCPs to strengthen their existing knowledge and fill the gaps that they have regarding cautions taken during breastfeeding, thereby preventing unnecessary actions taken.

This study revealed that HCPs working in the tertiary hospital were 3.8 times more likely to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with HCPs working in the primary hospital. The possible explanation might be that most of the tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia are University hospitals, usually are the center of excellence, where most training and research conferences take place.

Likewise, owning a smartphone and/or a computer was also found to be significantly affecting the HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, HCPs who had a smartphone and/or a computer were two times to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to those who did not own a smartphone and/or a computer. The possible reason might be that having a smartphone and/or computer at hand could increase access to social media utilization and organizational websites, which were found to increase HCPs’ knowledge so far [35]. The WHO released recommendation updates in the form of guidelines [7, 8], scientific brief [15], position statement [4], questions and answers [23], and news [25] for healthcare providers that can be accessed through the organizations’ website using the internet.

Similarly, the odds of being aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic were 1.8 times higher among HCPs who perceived that COVID-19 is dangerous than their counterparts. The possible explanation is that the more perceived risk of a disease one has, the better his enthusiasm would be to know about it. Attending COVID-19 training among HCPs who perceive that COVID-19 is dangerous and those who did not so was 75.2% and 24.8% respectively. Moreover, following the WHO and or CDC COVID-19 updates was 69.9% and 30.1% among those who perceive that COVID-19 is dangerous and those who did not respectively.

Moreover, taking a COVID-19 training was found to increase HCPs’ awareness of the breastfeeding practice recommendations. Thus, HCPs who had taken training on COVID-19 were 2.8 times to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic than their counterparts. This finding is supported by previous studies [35-40]. The COVID-19 training given by the Ethiopian public health institute was based on the national COVID-19 guideline for the management of pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic which addresses the issue of breastfeeding and newborn care [41].

Furthermore, HCPs who were following the WHO and/or CDC COVID-19 guideline updates were 2.6 times more likely to be aware of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to their counterparts. The finding is supported by studies in Ethiopia [35, 42]. The WHO and CDC released guidelines, scientific briefs, and position papers on breastfeeding and care of newborn babies for healthcare providers [4, 9, 18, 26]. So that, HCPs who use these guidelines might be aware of the breastfeeding practice recommendations.

Limitations of the study

We are pleased to acknowledge some of the limitations of the current study. First, there was no previously standardized and validated tool to assess the HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the area is not well studied, we didn’t find adequate studies to compare and contrast our findings with others, which made our discussion shallow. Second, due to the cross-sectional nature of the study design, inferring the cause-effect relationship between the dependent and independent variables might be impossible. Third, it is impossible to ensure the validity of the responses since the questionnaire was self-administered. However, the study participants were informed to fill the data honestly and their true response is crucial for the success of the study. Despite these limitations, our findings provide valuable information about HCPs’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

The HCPs’ awareness of the breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic was found to be low and it was positively associated with working in a tertiary hospital, following the WHO and/or CDC COVID-19 update, being trained on COVID-19, owning a smartphone, and/or a computer, and perceiving that COVID-19 is dangerous. A more rigorous update communication of practice recommendations on breastfeeding care among COVID-19 suspected and confirmed mother-baby dyads needs to be adopted through training especially towards lower-level HCPs.

English version of the questionnaire.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

SPSS dataset.

(SAV)

Click here for additional data file.

10 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-32452Health care providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a multicenter studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wondie,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 23 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Rohit Ravi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Regarding the data availability, authors agreed its available, is it that SPSS file at the end of document?

Table 1 title is mentioned twice, please check.

How p value of 0.2 is set for multivariable regression?

Reviewer #2: 1) Technical sections such as Materials & Methods section needs to expanded for the reader to completely grasp the concept, For example, Clear definition of what an HCP (Health Care Professional) is within the confines of the study needs to be stated, there is a need for explicitly stating why Gondar Province Hospitals were selected as a study setting and why was it only restricted to Government Hospitals - the same needs to be Substantiated with a Rationale, Also For computation of sample size justification for using 50% as provider awareness needs to be clearly stated

2) As per the guidelines enlisted, the Tables within the article should be included directly after the paragraph in which they are first cited

3) The authors need to explicitly state the cut off's of one considered being aware or unaware that were used for computation and drawing inference to improve the understanding of the reader.

4) The Authors to Cross check the Gender disaggregation stated in the Result section and the Appendix Table

5) Adherence to the sequence: Acknowledgments, References, Supporting information captions (if applicable) is required per the guidelines

6) Revision of language and formatting in a couple of places is required, including cross checking of the numbering of the Tables

7) The additional information under the tables are to be included in the the form of a footnote

8) There is a need to recheck and edit the References to meet the Vancouver format guidelines

9) The limitation section, needs to further highlight whether there are any potential bias, confounding variables that would potentially have an impact on the findings and inferences drawn, if any

Reviewer #3: Overall, this manuscript may be useful to know what factors contribute to health care providers' awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations. This research contributes to the body of knowledge and database.

Few suggestions include:

1. In abstract section, the data collection duration need to be corrected.

2. Observations that the breast feeding practice recommendations are being discussed for mothers suspected of or diagnosed with Covid-19 came very late in the process. It should be emphasized right from the start, starting with the objectives.

3. Under data processing and analysis, it is stated that those variables with p value 0.2 were included in logistic regression. What is the basis for taking such value? This raises a concern for overall regression analysis. This needs to be relooked.

4. Under the results section, under factors associated- it was mentioned that good or bad awareness. This is a wrong use of terminologies as there is nothing like good or bad. But instead, there could be certain factors which were associated with more likelihood of awareness. The results may be rewritten for better appropriate use of terminology.

5. The manuscript must be extensively revised for language and grammar.

6. We understand that there is paucity of evidence in this area and this limited the discussion in comparison with other studies. However, the discussion currently is giving results more quantitatively rather than a perspective that can be a little qualitative. May be a discussion around what the guidelines say and what is observed in the current study could be talked a little more. Apart from just the predictors, it may also be good to understand awareness around which indicators based on the questions used in the questionnaire is low and needs more attention. This will tell the readers what areas need more attention for creating awareness among health care providers.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

15 Nov 2021

Have been attached as a separate file.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

17 Nov 2021

Health care providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a multicenter study

PONE-D-21-32452R1

Dear Dr. Wondie,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Rohit Ravi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Authors, The changes made to the manuscipt are satisfactory.

Reviewers' comments:

19 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-32452R1

Health care providers’ awareness of breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a multicenter study

Dear Dr. Wondie:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Rohit Ravi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of healthcare providers in hospitals of Gondar province, 2021 (n = 405).

Characteristics	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Age in years
≤ 25	85	21.0
26–30	246	60.7
≥ 31	74	18.3
Sex
Male	271	66.9
Female	134	33.1
Current marital status
Single	164	40.5
Married	241	59.5
Religion
Orthodox Christian	380	93.8
Other☞	25	6.2
Having smart phone or computer
Yes	256	63.2
No	149	36.8
Average monthly income in Ethiopian birr
≤ 5, 000	140	34.6
5, 001–10, 000	238	58.7
≥ 10001	27	6.7

Note: ☞Muslim, catholic Christian & protestant Christian.

Table 2

Working place, profession, and COVID-19 related characteristics of study participants in hospitals of Gondar province, 2021 (n = 405).

Characteristics	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Professional category
Diploma midwifery	118	29.1
Degree midwifery	243	60
Master’s midwifery	25	6.2
Others☞	19	4.7
Hospital category
Primary hospital	176	43.5
General hospital	68	16.8
Comprehensive specialized hospital	161	39.8
Hospital location
Urban	222	54.8
Semi-urban	183	45.2
Work experience in years
≤ 2	140	34.6
3–5	209	51.6
> 5	56	13.8
COVID-19 is dangerous
Yes	299	73.8
No	106	26.2
Human milk contains viable SARS-CoV-2
Yes	292	27.9
No	113	72.1
Attending COVID-19 training
Yes	234	57.8
No	171	42.2
Following the WHO and or/CDC COVID-19 updates
Yes	186	45.9
No	219	54.1
Training on essential newborn care
Yes	156	38.5
No	249	61.5
Using the internet as a source of information about COVID-19
Yes	232	57.3
No	173	42.7
COVID-19 preventive measures are effective
Yes	109	26.9
No	296	73.1

Note: ☞ General practitioner, Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, Integrated Emergency Surgery Officer, Obstetrician.

Table 3

The WHO breastfeeding practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, Gondar province (n = 405).

Characteristics	Frequency	Percentage (%)
Early skin to skin contact is recommended
Yes	208	51.4
No	197	48.6
The mother should be told that the benefit of breastfeeding outweighs the potential risks of COVID-19 transmission
Yes	222	54.8
No	183	45.2
The umbilical cord should be clamped as usual
Yes	312	77
No	93	23
Breastfeeding should be initiated within one hour after delivery
Yes	296	73.1
No	109	26.9
Direct breastfeeding is recommended
Yes	214	52.8
No	191	47.2
A mother with COVID-19 can give expressed breast milk if she is too unwell to directly breastfeed
Yes	299	73.8
No	106	26.2
A COVID-19 suspected or confirmed mother should take routine precaution measures
Yes	85	21
No	320	79
Donor human milk or wet nursing can be used if a woman is severely infected with COVID-19
Yes	149	36.8
No	256	63.2
Rooming-in is recommended?
Yes	136	33.6
No	269	66.4
Psychological or practical breastfeeding support should be given to the mother if she prefers to breastfeed
Yes	241	59.5
No	164	40.5

Table 4

Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with healthcare providers’ awareness of the breastfeeding practice recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Gondar province, 2021 (n = 405).

Variables	Awareness to breastfeeding practice recommendation		COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)
	Aware	Not aware
Professional category
Diploma midwifery	39	79	1
Degree midwifery	106	137	1.57(0.99, 2.48)	0.91(0.52, 1.62)
Master’s midwifery	15	10	3.04(1.25, 7.38)	1.13(0.37, 3.44)
Others☞	5	14	0.72(0.24, 2.75)	0.63(0.19, 2.62)
Hospital category
Primary hospital	48	128	1
General hospital	23	45	1.36 (0.75, 2.49)	1.33(0.69, 2.54)
Comprehensive specialized hospital	94	67	3.74 (2.37, 5.91)	3.69(2.24, 6.08)***
Hospital location
Urban	115	107	2.86 (1.88, 4.34)	0.76 (0. 26, 2.22)
Semi-urban	50	133	1
COVID-19 is dangerous
Yes	131	168	1.65 (1.04, 2.64)	1.78(1.05, 3.01)*
No	34	72	1
Having smart phone and/or computer
Yes	119	137	1.94 (1.27, 2.98)	2.26(1.39, 3.68)**
No	46	103	1
Using internet as a source of information about COVID-19
Yes	109	123	1.85 (1.23, 2.79)	1.25 (0.7, 2.21)
No	56	117	1
Attending COVID-19 training
Yes	117	117	2.56 (1.68, 3.9)	2.78(1.74, 4.47)***
No	48	123	1
Following the WHO and or/CDC COVID-19 updates
Yes	99	87	2.64(1.76, 3.97)	3.34(2.1, 5.3)***
No	66	153	1

Notes

* P ≤ 0.05

**P ≤ 0.01

*** P ≤ 0.001; ☞ General practitioner, Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, and Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers; CDC-Centre for Disease Control and Prevention; WHO—World Health Organization.