Literature DB >> 34890078

International comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes: an update and extension.

Regina Prigge1, John A McKnight1,2, Sarah H Wild1, Aveni Haynes3, Timothy W Jones3,4,5, Elizabeth A Davis3,4,5, Birgit Rami-Merhar6, Maria Fritsch6,7, Christine Prchla8, Astrid Lavens9, Kris Doggen9, Suchsia Chao9, Ronnie Aronson10, Ruth Brown10, Else H Ibfelt11, Jannet Svensson12, Robert Young13, Justin T Warner14, Holy Robinson15, Tiina Laatikainen16,17,18, Päivi Rautiainen18, Brigitte Delemer19, Pierre François Souchon20, Alpha M Diallo19, Reinhard W Holl21,22, Sebastian M Schmid22,23, Klemens Raile24, Stelios Tigas25, Alexandra Bargiota26, Ioanna Zografou27, Andrea O Y Luk28, Juliana C N Chan29, Sean F Dinneen30,31, Claire M Buckley32, Oratile Kgosidialwa30, Valentino Cherubini33, Rosaria Gesuita34, Ieva Strele35, Santa Pildava36, Henk Veeze37, Henk-Jan Aanstoot37, Dick Mul37, Craig Jefferies38, John G Cooper39, Karianne Fjeld Løvaas39, Tadej Battelino40,41, Klemen Dovc40,41, Nataša Bratina40,41, Katarina Eeg-Olofsson42,43, Ann-Marie Svensson43,44, Soffia Gudbjornsdottir43,44, Evgenia Globa45, Nataliya Zelinska45.   

Abstract

AIMS: To update and extend a previous cross-sectional international comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes.
METHODS: Data were obtained for 520,392 children and adults with type 1 diabetes from 17 population and five clinic-based data sources in countries or regions between 2016 and 2020. Median HbA1c (IQR) and proportions of individuals with HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%), 58-74 mmol/mol (7.5-8.9%) and ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) were compared between populations for individuals aged <15, 15-24 and ≥25 years. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) relative to ≥58 mmol/mol (≥7.5%), stratified and adjusted for sex, age and data source. Where possible, changes in the proportion of individuals in each HbA1c category compared to previous estimates were calculated.
RESULTS: Median HbA1c varied from 55 to 79 mmol/mol (7.2 to 9.4%) across data sources and age groups so a pooled estimate was deemed inappropriate. OR (95% CI) for HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) were 0.91 (0.90-0.92) for women compared to men, 1.68 (1.65-1.71) for people aged <15 years and 0.81 (0.79-0.82) aged15-24 years compared to those aged ≥25 years. Differences between populations persisted after adjusting for sex, age and data source. In general, compared to our previous analysis, the proportion of people with an HbA1c  < 58 mmol/l (<7.5%) increased and proportions of people with HbA1c ≥ 75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes continues to vary substantially between age groups and data sources. While some improvement over time has been observed, glycaemic control remains sub-optimal for most people with Type 1 diabetes.
© 2021 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA1c; glycaemic control; registers of people with diabetes; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34890078     DOI: 10.1111/dme.14766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Epigenetic Modifications in Late Complications in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Barbara Čugalj Kern; Katarina Trebušak Podkrajšek; Jernej Kovač; Robert Šket; Barbara Jenko Bizjan; Tine Tesovnik; Maruša Debeljak; Tadej Battelino; Nataša Bratina
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 2.  Reimagining care for young adults living with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Eimear C Morrissey; Sean F Dinneen; Michelle Lowry; Eelco Jp de Koning; Marleen Kunneman
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Cohort profile: the Scottish Diabetes Research Network national diabetes cohort - a population-based cohort of people with diabetes in Scotland.

Authors:  Stuart J McGurnaghan; Luke A K Blackbourn; Thomas M Caparrotta; Joseph Mellor; Anna Barnett; Andy Collier; Naveed Sattar; John McKnight; John Petrie; Sam Philip; Robert Lindsay; Katherine Hughes; David McAllister; Graham P Leese; Ewan R Pearson; Sarah Wild; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.