Literature DB >> 34889987

A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals false positives of bacterial essential genes.

Yuanhao Li1,2, Bo Jiang1,2, Weijun Dai3,4.   

Abstract

Essential genes are crucial for bacterial viability and represent attractive targets for novel anti-pathogen drug discovery. However, essential genes determined by the transposon insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) approach often contain many false positives. We hypothesized that some of those false positives are genes that are actually deleted from the genome, so they do not present any transposon insertion in the course of Tn-seq analysis. Based on this assumption, we performed a large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis for the bacterium of interest. Our analysis revealed that some "essential genes" are indeed removed from the analyzed bacterial genomes. Since these genes were kicked out by bacteria, they should not be defined as essential. Our work showed that gene deletion is one of the false positive sources of essentiality determination, which is apparently underestimated in previous studies. We suggest subtracting the genome backgrounds before the evaluation of Tn-seq, and created a list of false positive gene essentiality as a reference for the downstream application. KEY POINTS: • Discovery of false positives of essential genes defined previously through the analyses of a large scale of whole-genome sequencing data • These false positives are the results of gene deletions in the studied genomes • Sequencing the target genome before Tn-seq analysis is of importance while some studies neglected it.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Essential genes; Gene deletion; Whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34889987     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11702-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

Review 1.  Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  A Mira; H Ochman; N A Moran
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Order and disorder in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  Bayesian analysis of gene essentiality based on sequencing of transposon insertion libraries.

Authors:  Michael A DeJesus; Yanjia J Zhang; Christopher M Sassetti; Eric J Rubin; James C Sacchettini; Thomas R Ioerger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strains.

Authors:  Jens Klockgether; Antje Munder; Jens Neugebauer; Colin F Davenport; Frauke Stanke; Karen D Larbig; Stephan Heeb; Ulrike Schöck; Thomas M Pohl; Lutz Wiehlmann; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The essential genome of a bacterium.

Authors:  Beat Christen; Eduardo Abeliuk; John M Collier; Virginia S Kalogeraki; Ben Passarelli; John A Coller; Michael J Fero; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.429

6.  Evaluation of a microarray-hybridization based method applicable for discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome.

Authors:  Andreas Dötsch; Claudia Pommerenke; Florian Bredenbruch; Robert Geffers; Susanne Häussler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.