Literature DB >> 34888447

Systems-based investigation of patient safety incidents.

Sean Weaver1, Kevin Stewart1, Lesley Kay1.   

Abstract

Patient safety events are common in healthcare. We can learn from other safety-critical industries that further incidents are most likely to be prevented where lessons are learned at the system level rather than looking to attribute blame for errors to individuals. Progress has been made over the last 20 years and relies on a positive safety culture (or just culture) where staff trust organisations to investigate safety events for learning rather than blame. Systems-based investigation models, such as the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS), help investigators to consider the full range of contributory factors across a system and to identify important findings. Considering the hierarchy of controls, recommendations should be targeted at system changes which are more likely to produce sustained safety improvements, rather than at individual behaviours or training, which are less likely to influence future safety. Systems-based safety investigations can positively influence safety culture in organisations. © Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hierarchy of controls; patient safety; systems-based safety investigation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34888447      PMCID: PMC8651333          DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Healthc J        ISSN: 2514-6645


  9 in total

Review 1.  Successful risk assessment may not always lead to successful risk control: A systematic literature review of risk control after root cause analysis.

Authors:  Alan J Card; James Ward; P John Clarkson
Journal:  J Healthc Risk Manag       Date:  2012

2.  Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp.

Authors:  Patricia Trbovich; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.

Authors:  P Carayon; A Schoofs Hundt; B-T Karsh; A P Gurses; C J Alvarado; M Smith; P Flatley Brennan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

4.  An organisation with a memory.

Authors:  Liam Donaldson
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Trends in healthcare incident reporting and relationship to safety and quality data in acute hospitals: results from the National Reporting and Learning System.

Authors:  A Hutchinson; T A Young; K L Cooper; A McIntosh; J D Karnon; S Scobie; R G Thomson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

Review 6.  Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Rosemary R C McEachan; Sally J Giles; Reema Sirriyeh; Ian S Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Learning from high risk industries may not be straightforward: a qualitative study of the hierarchy of risk controls approach in healthcare.

Authors:  Elisa G Liberati; Mohammad Farhad Peerally; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Can we import improvements from industry to healthcare?

Authors:  Carl Macrae; Kevin Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-03-21

Review 9.  SEIPS 101 and seven simple SEIPS tools.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.035

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Patient safety: time for a radical re-think.

Authors: 
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11

2.  Safety and the pandemic: changing perspectives for patients, professionals and populations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.