| Literature DB >> 34887918 |
Fariba Iraji1, Ali Asilian1, Zahra Talebzadeh1, Mina Saber1, Fatemeh Mokhtari1, Amirhossein Siadat1, Seyed Mohsen Hosseini1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vitiligo is a common, autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the melanocytes and manifests as depigmented macules on various areas of the skin. Numerous treatment options have been proposed for vitiligo. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus 1% versus the sole use of topical pimecrolimus 1% for the treatment of vitiligo.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34887918 PMCID: PMC8651420 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5652140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6113
Figure 1The flowchart of the study.
Figure 220-year-old female patient's right leg: the appearance of pinpoint bleeding, the endpoint of the microneedling procedure.
Clinical data of studied cases.
| No. | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 8 | 53.33 |
| Female | 7 | 46.66 | |
|
| |||
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 33.8 ± 10.10 | |
| Min-max | 18–56 | ||
|
| |||
| Family history | Negative | 12 | 80.00 |
| Positive | 3 | 20.00 | |
|
| |||
| Type of skin | III | 10 | 66.66 |
| IV | 5 | 33.33 | |
|
| |||
| Previous history of treatment | Yes | 15 | 100 |
| No | 0 | 0 | |
Comparison between topical pimecrolimus therapy and combination therapy according to degree of repigmentation during the treatment and follow-up period.
| Treatment method | Pimecrolimus | Combination of microneedling and pimecrolimus | Fischer's exact test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repigmentation status | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent | |
| After 2 weeks | 15 (100%) | 15 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | — |
| After 1 month | 15 (100%) | 14 (93.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.999 |
| After 45 days | 15 (100%) | 11 (73.3%) | 4 (26.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.027 |
| After 2 months | 15 (100%) | 9 (60%) | 6 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.01 |
| After 75 days | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 7 (46.7%) | 2 (13.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.001 |
| After 3 months | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 4 (26.7%) | 5 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 |
| After 6 months' follow-up | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 4 (26.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | <0.001 |
| Friedman test | — | <0.001 | ||||
Figure 3A 47-year-old female patient with refractory patches on the dorsal aspect of her left forearm: (a) before treatment; (b) six months' follow-up after treatment by topical pimecrolimus 1% on the pointed lesion. No changes were observed.
Figure 4(a) A 47-year-old female patient with three refractory patches on the dorsal aspect of her right forearm, before treatment, (b) two months after treatment by microneedling plus topical pimecrolimus 1% on the pointed lesion (the largest lesion of the three), (c) three months after treatment with same procedure, and (d) at six months' follow-up after treatment.
Percentage of patients' satisfaction in both groups during treatment and follow-up.
| Treatment method | Pimecrolimus | Combination of microneedling and pimecrolimus | Fischer's exact test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients' satisfaction | Ultralow | Ultralow | Low | Moderate | High | |
| After 2 weeks | 15 (100%) | 14 (93.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.999 |
| After 1 month | 15 (100%) | 13 (86.6%) | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.762 |
| After 45 days | 15 (100%) | 10 (6.66%) | 1 (6.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.035 |
| After 2 months | 15 (100%) | 9 (60%) | 1 (6.7%) | 5 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0.019 |
| After 75 days | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (46.6%) | 2 (13.4%) | <0.001 |
| After 3 months | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (26.7%) | 5 (33.3%) | <0.001 |
| After 6 months' follow-up | 15 (100%) | 6 (40%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (26.7%) | 5 (33.3%) | <0.001 |
| Friedman test | - | <0.001 | ||||
Comparison of numerical indices of patients' DLQI scores in monotherapy and combination therapy.
| Treatment method | Pimecrolimus | Combination of microneedling and pimecrolimus | Kruskalovalis test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLQI | Mean standard deviation | Median | Interquartile range | Mean standard deviation | Median | Interquartile range | |
| Before treatment | 20.50 (1.65) | 20.50 | (22, 19) | 20.73 (1.83) | 21 | (22, 19) | 0.937 |
| After 2 weeks | 20.64 (1.59) | 21 | (22, 19) | 20.73 (1.62) | 21 | (22, 19) | 0.953 |
| After 1 month | 20.67 (1.23) | 21 | (22, 20) | 20.33 (1.49) | 21 | (22, 19) | 0.812 |
| After 45 days | 20.80 (1.32) | 21 | (21, 20) | 20.20 (2.04) | 20 | (22, 19) | 0.699 |
| After 2 months | 20.67 (1.49) | 21 | (22, 19) | 20.00 (2.03) | 20 | (21, 18) | 0.492 |
| After 75 days | 21.00 (1.51) | 21 | (22, 20) | 19.07 (2.57) | 19 | (21, 18) | 0.091 |
| After 3 months | 20.80 (1.47) | 20 | (22, 20) | 18.47 (3.42) | 18 | (22, 15) | 0.132 |
| After 6 months' follow-up | 20.80 (1.74) | 21 | (22, 19) | 18.47 (3.46) | 18 | (22, 15) | 0.149 |
| Friedman test | 0.943 | 0.002 | |||||