| Literature DB >> 34887853 |
Caleb Nwongbouwoh Muefong1,2, Olumuyiwa Owolabi1, Simon Donkor1, Salome Charalambous3, Joseph Mendy1, Isatou C M Sey1, Abhishek Bakuli2,4, Andrea Rachow2,4, Christof Geldmacher2,4, Jayne S Sutherland1.
Abstract
Background: The inflammatory response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis results in variable degrees of lung pathology during active TB (ATB) with central involvement of neutrophils. Little is known about neutrophil-derived mediators and their role in disease severity at baseline and recovery upon TB treatment initiation.Entities:
Keywords: MMP8; S100A8/9; lung pathology; myeloperoxidase; neutrophils; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34887853 PMCID: PMC8650718 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.740933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Patient demographics.
| Total | CXR-defined | GeneXpert-defined | Lung Recovery | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild N = 46 | Severe N = 61 | Low N = 53 | High N = 45 | NA N = 9 | Good N = 30 | Poor N = 22 | ||
| Age | 32 [23–40] | 29.5 [21–39] | 32 [26–41] | 29 [22–40] | 31 [25–40] | 32 [30–34] | 32 [24–41] | 32 [26–37] |
| Male | 82 (77) | 29 (63) | 53 (87) | 34 (64) | 40 (89) | 8 (89) | 26 (87) | 19 (86) |
| p = 3.90E−03 | p = 4.50E−03 | ns | ||||||
ns, not significant; CXR, chest X-ray; age = median [interquartile range].
Correlation between neutrophil count and analyte concentrations at baseline.
| rho | p-value | |
|---|---|---|
| MMP1 | 0.20 | ns |
| MMP3 | 0.23 | 2.20E−02 |
| MMP8 | 0.45 | 2.80E−06 |
| MMP9 | 0.16 | ns |
| MPO | 0.021 | ns |
| S1000A8 | 0.52 | 3.00E−08 |
| S100A9 | 0.33 | 6.30E−04 |
| IL8 | 0.22 | 3.00E−02 |
| IL10 | 0.32 | 1.30E−03 |
| IL12/23(p40) | 0.32 | 1.10E−03 |
| GM-CSF | 0.43 | 7.90E−06 |
| TNF | 0.38 | 1.00E−05 |
| IFNγ | 0.36 | 2.40E−04 |
ns, not significant; rho, spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Correlation between neutrophil count and analyte concentrations in plasma for patients with different degree of lung damage (CXR) and Mtb load (GeneXpert) at baseline.
| Analyte | Lung damage | Mtb load | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Severe | Low | High | |||||
| rho | p-value | rho | p-value | rho | p-value | rho | p-value | |
| MMP1 | 0.16 | ns | 0.16 | ns | 0.20 | ns | 0.18 | ns |
| MMP3 | 0.13 | ns | 0.26 | ns | 0.26 | ns | 0.11 | ns |
| MMP8 | 0.46 | 2.00E−03 | 0.40 | 2.10E−03 | 0.27 | ns | 0.65 | 2.80E−06 |
| MMP9 | −0.13 | ns | 0.26 | 4.10E−02 | 0.04 | ns | 0.29 | ns |
| MPO | −0.13 | ns | 0.10 | ns | −0.18 | ns | 0.37 | 1.50E−02 |
| S1000A8 | 0.39 | 9.70E−03 | 0.49 | 8.20E−05 | 0.41 | 3.50E−03 | 0.59 | 2.60E−05 |
| S100A9 | 0.39 | 1.00E−02 | 0.27 | 4.00E−02 | 0.26 | ns | 0.47 | 1.40E−03 |
| IL8 | 0.06 | ns | 0.26 | 4.70E−02 | 0.09 | ns | 0.30 | ns |
| IL10 | 0.28 | ns | 0.38 | 3.80E−03 | 0.20 | ns | 0.42 | 6.40E−03 |
| IL12/23(p40) | 0.18 | ns | 0.35 | 6.40E−03 | 0.13 | ns | 0.50 | 7.20E−04 |
| GM-CSF | 0.27 | ns | 0.50 | 5.40E−05 | 0.34 | 1.50E−02 | 0.51 | 5.50E−04 |
| TNF | 0.18 | ns | 0.45 | 4.10E−04 | 0.38 | 7.30E−03 | 0.37 | 1.50E−02 |
| IFNγ | 0.18 | ns | 0.43 | 8.20E−04 | 0.21 | ns | 0.46 | 1.90E−03 |
ns, not significant; rho, spearman’s rank coefficient.
Figure 1Comparisons of inflammatory mediator concentrations at baseline. (A) In plasma, patients with severe lung damage (n = 61) had higher levels of proinflammatory mediators than those with mild lung damage (n = 46). (B) Sputum levels of mmp8 were higher whilst MPO and IL10 were lower in patients with severe (n = 60) compared to mild lung (n = 36) damage. (C) Whereas sputum S100A8 was higher and MPO was lower in patients with high Mtb loads (n = 45) compared to low Mtb loads (n = 53). Boxes represent the first and third quartiles and horizontal bars within indicate median concentration. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values. Each dot represents one individual patient. P-values were obtained using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Figure 2Comparison of sputum inflammatory mediator levels between good and poor lung recovery groups with treatment time. (A) MPO and IL10 were higher in good (BL, n = 29; 2M, n = 16; 6M, n = 16) compared to poor (BL, n = 22; 2M, n = 16; 6M, n = 16) lung recovery groups at baseline. Data represent median [IQR]. Differences between lung pathology groups at any given time point were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. (B) Most MMP1, 3, 9, and TNF levels were significantly lower at month 6 compared to baseline in patients with good lung recovery but not in those with poor lung recovery. Boxes represent the first and third quartiles and horizontal bars within indicate median concentration. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values. Each dot represents one individual patient. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test comparison was performed to analyse differences between time points. (C) At the end of standard TB treatment, MMP1, MMP9 and IL8 concentrations were still higher in patients with poor lung recovery compared to those with poor lung recovery. Groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Data represent median [IQR]. ns, not significant.
Figure 3Comparison of inflammatory mediator levels between lung damage and Mtb burden defined groups with treatment time. (A) In plasma, the decrease in S100A9 concentrations was comparable between lung damage groups (mild: BL, n = 46; 2M, n = 25; 6M, n = 14 and severe: BL, n = 61; 2M, n = 42; 6M, n = 43) over time. However, at month 6, S100A9 was significantly higher in patients with initially severe lung damage compared to mild lung damage. (B) The same observation made between initially high Mtb and low Mtb loads with S100A9 levels being higher in the former at month 6. Boxes represent the first and third quartiles and horizontal bars within indicate median concentration. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum values. Each dot represents one individual patient. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test comparison was performed to analyse differences between time points. Differences between lung pathology groups at any given time point were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Data represent median [IQR]. (C) Sputum (low: BL, n = 46; 2M, n = 21; 6M, n = 16 and high: BL, n = 42; 2M, n = 22; 6M, n = 17) MMP9 levels were significantly lower at month 6 compared to baseline in patients with low but not in those with high Mtb loads. Additionally, S100A9 concentration at month 6 was significantly higher in patients with high Mtb compared to low Mtb load. ns, not significant.