| Literature DB >> 34887709 |
Xueqing Liu1, Sufang Huang1, Jing Cheng1, Ying Zhang2.
Abstract
The application of emergency nursing process in intravenous thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction was discussed. 100 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for intravenous thrombolysis. 50 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction were treated from December 2018 to June 2019. The first-aid time and treatment effect of the two groups were compared. The results showed that the first aid time in the optimized process group was less than that in the conventional flow group (P < 0.05); the ECG rate was higher within 10 min than that in the conventional flow group (P < 0.05). It indicates that standardized and meticulous nursing procedures can avoid repetition and omissions and improve work efficiency. The application of the emergency care process in the emergency care of patients with acute myocardial infarction can win more rescue time and then improve the success rate of their rescue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34887709 PMCID: PMC8629612 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3043289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Comparison of general data in the two groups ().
| Group | Example number | Sex | Age (year) | Site of myocardial infarction | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man | Woman | Antetheca | Paries inferior | Lower wall + right chamber | Lower wall + rear wall | Lower wall + front wall | Front wall + high side wall | |||
| Regular process group | 50 | 32 | 18 | 62.8 ± 11.4 | 36 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Optimize the process group | 50 | 34 | 16 | 66.1 ± 14.2 | 34 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Note: the anterior wall of the myocardial infarction site includes the anterior interwall, restricted anterior wall, extensive anterior wall, etc. P > 0.05.
Comparison of first aid time between the two groups .
| Group | Example number | See an electrocardiogram Time | See an electrocardiogram report time | Blood collection time to the vein | Visit to oral thrombolytic drug time | Visit the doctor until signing the consent form | Visit the vein bolt time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular process group | 50 | 7.7 ± 4.9 | 8.1 ± 5.2 | 9.1 ± 5.2 | 22.5 ± 6.5 | 26.0 ± 6.4 | 28.2 ± 6.2 |
| Optimize the process group | 50 | 4.4 ± 2.8 | 4.5 ± 3.0 | 4.7 ± 2.9 | 5.8 ± 2.7 | 17.7 ± 6.3 | 19.5 ± 6.1 |
|
| 5.01 | 5.10 | 6.47 | 18.12 | 7.73 | 7.87 | |
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of the treatment effect between the two patient groups.
| Group | Example number | The ECG rate within 10 min | Rate of venous thrombolysis within 30 min | Rescue success rate | Rescue success rate | Death rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular process group | 50 | 31 (62) | 30 (60) | 36 (2) | 20 (40) | 4 (8) |
| Optimize the process group | 50 | 47 (94) | 46 (92) | 48 (96) | 5 (10) | 0 (0) |
|
| ||||||
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Figure 1Comparison plot of satisfaction between the two groups.