Literature DB >> 34887677

The Impact of Illness Perceptions on Depressive Symptoms Among Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptom.

Haiqin Tang1,2, Zhiqiang Zhang3, Linlin Yang1,2, Xin Chen3, Zhiqi Liu3, Wei Sun3, Dexin Yu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at exploring whether illness perceptions may mediate the relationship between depressive symptoms and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.
METHODS: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for the severity of LUTS and the brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) for illness perceptions (IPs) were used among the 157 BPH patients with LUTS. Pearson's correlation test and hierarchical regression analyses were used to assess the correlations between LUTS, depressive symptoms and IPs.
RESULTS: Our study found that the severity of LUTS was associated with depressive symptoms and subscales of illness perception; meanwhile, IPs were associated with the level of education. A positive relationship was found between the scores of PHQ9 and the B-IPQ subscales of illness consequences, identity, timeline, concern and emotion; thus, a negative correlation was found between scores of PHQ9 and the B-IPQ subscales of illness coherence, personal control and treatment control. The hierarchical regression analysis showed IPSS and the B-IPQ subscales of illness consequences, concern and emotion were significantly associated with depression, and explained 85.1% of the variance in depressive symptoms (R2 = 0.851, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The relationship between LUTS and depressive symptoms may be mediated by the negative IPs, including consequences, concern and emotions. Clinicians should not only focus on the LUTS but also on the IPs to improve depressive symptoms among BPH patients.
© 2021 Yang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benign prostatic hyperplasia; depression; illness perceptions; lower urinary tract symptom

Year:  2021        PMID: 34887677      PMCID: PMC8651631          DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S342512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gen Med        ISSN: 1178-7074


Introduction

BPH is one of the most common chronic conditions in older men, and typically presents with lower urinary tract symptoms. The incidence of BPH will markedly rise with progressive aging of the adult male, especially after 40 years old.1 LUTS comprise storage (frequency, urgency, and nocturia), voiding (poor stream, hesitancy, and straining to void) and post-micturition symptoms.2 Despite the fact that LUTS/BPH is not a life-threatening condition, the elderly who suffer LUTS often have many concomitant illnesses (eg constipation, neurological disease)3 and increase the risk for serious adverse events (eg falls, fractures),4 which have a significant impact on the quality of life.5 In addition, LUTS/BPH is associated with many psychological conditions, including depression and anxiety. A nationwide population-based study demonstrated that depression is a major risk factor for the dementia in patients with LUTS, and early screening and interventions for depression in patients with LUTS may play an important role in maintaining cognitive function.6 In addition, Chiang et al7 demonstrated that LUTS increased the risk of dementia in Chinese population. Depression is a highly prevalent condition, especially among older adults and cancer patients,8–10 which affects the quality-of-life of patients and increases burden of families and public health care costs.11 Increasing cross-sectional studies have reported that BPH/LUTS was significantly associated with depressive symptoms. Men with LUTS were shown to be at 2.60~3.9 times higher risk of depression than those without LUTS.12–14 Despite the well-documented high incidence of depression in BPH patients, the mechanisms underpinning the psychological associations remain to be poorly understood. Leventhal et al15 first proposed the concept of illness perception and developed the Common Sense Model (CSM). According to the Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation, when faced with threats to health, individuals generate cognitive, emotional, and causal cognitions and the beliefs about the illness. These cognitions and the beliefs about the condition of the illness originate from past knowledge and experiences, and information from others (eg media, doctors). IPs, as a fundamental component of CSM, consist of five dimensions, including identity, causes, consequences, timeline, control (personal control and treatment control), and emotional dimensions. Increasing studies have investigated the relationship between IPs and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL)/psychological distress in cancer and non-cancer populations. Shallcross et al16 found that IPs mediate the relationship between depression and quality of life in patients with epilepsy. A study by De Gucht17 demonstrated that IPs mediate the relationship between bowel symptom severity and HRQOL in irritable bowel syndrome patients. From the previous studies, IPs are potentially important determinants of psychological distress, the present study first aimed at exploring the following hypotheses: (1) We examined the severity of depressive symptoms and IPs in BPH patients with LUTS. (2) The current study aimed at exploring whether IPs may mediate the hypothesized relationship between depressive symptoms and LUTS among BPH patients.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Patients with a diagnosis of BPH were recruited to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from May 2016 to December 2018. In current study, the eligibility criteria are as follows: (1) Chinese-speaking; (2) no psychological distress; (3) age >60 years old; (4) diagnosis of BPH. The following exclusion criteria included: (1) clinical evidence of prostate cancer; (2) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10ng/mL, (4) malignant tumors; (5) diagnosis of neurological or psychiatric disease; (6) with serious co-morbidities (including diabetes mellitus); (7) taking any drugs for BPH (eg, alpha-blockers, 5αreductase inhibitor).

Materials

The aims and procedures of the present study were explained to each participant, and we conducted face-to-face interviews.

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Socio-demographic data were gathered from medical records and socio-demographic questionnaire (eg age, marital status, level of education). Clinical characteristics, including disease-specific information (prostatic volume, PSA), time since diagnosis and treatment of BPH, were collected from medical records and patients.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The first version of IPSS is designed to assess the BPH-related symptoms in 1992 by the American Urological Association (AUA). IPSS is a quick self-administered tool, which is widely used to evaluate LUTS in men with urinary complaints.18 The IPSS consists of seven questions regarding symptoms (frequency, urgency, nocturia, intermittency, weak urine stream and straining) and one LUTS-specific question on HRQoL.19 The total scores of symptoms range from 0 to 35. For the symptom score, scores ranging from 1 to 7 indicate mild symptom, scores ranging from 8 to 19 indicate moderate symptoms, scores ranging from 20 to 35 indicate severe symptoms. The Chinese version of IPSS had good content validity and reliability.20 In our study, LUTS were measured with the Chinese version of IPSS.

The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ)

IPs in BPH patients with LUTS were assessed with the Chinese version of the 8-item B-IPQ. The B-IPQ was used to evaluate cognitive and emotional characteristics of illness among the patients with BPH. The B-IPQ had good reliability and validity, which was widely used among different populations.21,22 Each core item has a 0–10-point scale. The B-IPQ was designed to assess consequences (how much influence of the illness on their life), timeline (how long the prospects of illness duration will continue), identity (“experienced symptoms of illness”), personal control (“the individual beliefs of control over the illness”), treatment control (“the individual beliefs in treatment”), coherence (understanding of illness), concern (“the extent of concern about illness”) and emotion (emotional response to illness).21,23,24

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

Depression was assessed by the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in BPH patients. PHQ-9 is developed on a self-assessment scale designed to rapidly and reliably assess symptoms of depression based on symptoms over a two-week period.25 The PHQ-9, as a valid and reliable questionnaire, has a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) in China.26 PHQ-9 contains 9 items, which are assessed on a 4-point scale according to the frequency. The total scores for PHQ-9 ranges from 0 to 27. The severity of depressive symptoms depends on the total score, and higher scores indicate greater level of depressive symptoms. The scores ranging from 0 to 4 indicate no depressive symptom, scores ranging from 5 to 9 represent with mild depressive symptoms, scores ranging from 10 to 14 represent with moderate depression symptoms, scores ranging from 15 to 19 represent with moderately severe depression symptoms, scores ranging from 20 to 27 represent with severe depression symptoms.27

Statistical Analysis

Our data analysis was calculated using SPSS 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare continuous variables, and a chi-square test was conducted to compare categorical variables among different groups. Pearson's correlations were conducted to assess relationships between LUTS, depressive symptoms, and illness perceptions and correlations between B-IPQ subscales. In order to determine the independent contribution of variance to depressive symptoms, the hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. A p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Sociodemographic and Disease-Specific Characteristics

A total of 157 BPH patients (from Hefei city) with LUTS were approached for participation. The mean age was 68.65 years (SD = 5.33), the majority of participants in our sample were married (n = 152; 96.8%), 60.5% (95/157) had primary education. The mean BMI was 23.36 Kg/m2 (SD = 2.88). Overall, 13.4% were current smokers, 12.1% were non-drinkers. The mean PSA was 2.80 ng/mL (SD = 1.26), and the mean PV was 66.60 mL (32.72). The majority of the patients (n = 142; 90.5%) had moderate LUTS for analysis, and only 12 patients (7.6%) presented severe LUTS (see Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of All participants (N = 157)

VariableN%Mean±SD/Median (Range)
Age (years)68.65±5.33
BMI(Kg/m2)23.36±2.88
Current smoker2113.4
Alcohol use1912.1
Educational status
 Primary education9560.5
 High school5132.5
 Higher education117.0
Marital status
 Married15296.8
 Divorced/Widowed53.2
PSA (ng/mL)2.80±1.26
Prostate volume (mL)66.60±32.72
Lower urinary tract symptoms
 None (0)0
 Mild (1–7)31.9
 Moderate (8–19)14290.5
 Severe (20–35)127.6
Duration of LUTS (month)15.56±4.01
Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of All participants (N = 157)

IPs and Depressive Symptoms Among BPH Patients with LUTS

Table 2 shows that non-depression, mild and moderate depression groups differ in LUTS and IPs. Table 3 shows the mild, moderate and severe LUTS groups differ in severity of depression and IPs. We analyzed the B-IPQ scores for every item. Intercorrelations between Chinese B-IPQ subscales are presented in Table 4. The analysis showed good intercorrelations among items. The results suggested that the BPH patients with LUTS perceiving more labels and symptoms (consequences and identity) reported longer illness duration, less personal and treatment control, more concern, and had more negative emotional impact. Our results showed a positive correlation between depression scores and the scores on the B-IPQ subscales of consequences (r = 0.875), timeline (r = 0.668), identity (r = 0.779), concern (r = 0.871), emotions (r = 0.878) (p˂0.001). There was a negative correlation between the depression scores and the scores on the B-IPQ subscales of person control (r =−0.647), treatment control (r = −0.715) and coherence (r = −0.701) (p˂0.001). There was a positive correlation between LUTS and negative IPs included consequences (r = 0.528), timeline (r = 0.417), identity (r = 0.457), concern (r = 0.479), emotions (r = 0.512) (p˂0.001). Thus, there was a negative association between LUTS and positive IPs, including person control (r = −0.464), treatment control (r = −0.473) and coherence (r = −0.525) (p˂0.001) (See Table 5).
Table 2

Comparison of LUTS and IPs Between Different BPH Patients with Depressive Symptoms

VariableNon-Depression (n=127)Mild Depression (n=26)Moderate Depression (n=4)F/x2P
Age (years)68.39±5.3569.23±5.2073.25±3.771.8210.165
BMI(Kg/m2)23.45±2.9522.67±2.6024.93±1.681.3930.252
Current smoker16501.1180.553
Alcohol use14411.7960.362
Educational status6.0450.151
 Primary education71213
 High school4551
 Higher education1100
Marital status1.0020.640
 Married122264
 Divorced/Widowed500
PSA (ng/mL)2.75±1.263.15±1.172.16±1.091.6450.196
Prostate volume (mL)67.54±33.7963.89±29.6754.40±9.570.4170.660
LUTS (IPSS)13.35±3.1716.46±4.1518.75±5.1213.0220.000*
Duration of LUTS (month)14.59±3.4719.08±3.3323.50±2.3829.3960.000*
Illness perception
 Consequences3.79±1.096.30±0.748.50±1.2994.4490.000*
 Timeline3.65±0.865.19±1.066.00±0.0043.3760.000*
 Personal control3.83±0.992.57±0.812.00±0.0024.0380.000*
 Treatment control4.91±1.053.00±0.632.25±0.5051.2270.000*
 Identity3.56±1.125.88±0.517.25±0.9573.4660.000*
 Concern3.89±0.906.27±0.538.25±0.50125.7750.000*
 Coherence4.24±1.002.84±0.881.75±0.5032.8090.000*
 Emotions3.56±0.996.04±0.608.00±0.82112.2040.000*
 Total score of IP31.45±2.6838.11±1.6344.00±2.83113.6620.000*

Note: *P<0.001 (2-tailed).

Abbreviations: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; IPs, illness perceptions.

Table 3

Comparison of Depressive Symptoms and IPs Between Different BPH Patients with LUTS

VariableMild LUTS (n=3)Moderate LUTS (n=142)Severe LUTS (n=12)F/x2P
Age (years)66.67±1.5368.43±5.3471.75±4.922.4050.094
BMI(Kg/m2)25.17±4.2323.29±2.8923.72±2.630.7200.488
Current smoker11733.4760.145
Alcohol use01810.7181.000
Educational status12.6870.005
 Primary education0878
 High school1482
 Higher education272
Marital status0.8171.000
 Married313712
 Divorced/Widowed050
PSA (ng/mL)2.73±1.382.85±1.282.18±0.811.5570.214
Prostate volume (mL)63.67±17.2067.03±33.6962.24±23.650.1290.879
Depression1.67±0.583.67±1.486.50±3.2118.8740.000*
Duration of LUTS (month)12.67±3.2115.21±3.7320.42±4.2511.4770.000*
Illness perceptions
 Consequences1.67±0.574.24±1.386.08±2.0714.3920.000*
 Timeline2.67±0.583.89±1.055.25±0.8712.1450.000*
 Personal control5.00±0.003.63±1.072.58±0.678.4690.000*
 Treatment control5.67±1.154.62±1.203.17±1.279.4010.000*
 Identity3.00±0.003.90±1.355.92±1.3113.3820.000*
 Concern2.67±0.584.31±1.265.92±1.6811.3630.000*
 Coherence6.33±0.584.00±1.062.75±1.1415.4410.000*
 Emotions2.33±0.583.96±1.325.92±1.6814.2480.000*
Total score of IP29.33±0.5832.55±3.6637.58±4.8111.4530.000*

Note: *P<0.001 (2-tailed).

Abbreviations: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; IP, illness perceptions.

Table 4

Intercorrelations Between Chinese B-IPQ Subscales Among BPH Patients

B-IPQMean±SD12345678
Consequences4.331±1.5541
Timeline3.968±1.1000.707*1
Personal control3.573±1.087−0.705*−0.612*1
Treatment control4.529±1.269−0.753*−0.654*0.676*1
Identity4.038±1.4450.839*0.718*−0.634*−0.724*1
Concern4.401±1.3720.860*0.722*−0.671*−0.756*0.797*1
Coherence3.949±1.153−0.745*−0.628*0.637*0.671*−0.641*−0.704*1
Emotions4.082±1.4540.856*0.691*−0.707*−0.774*0.840*0.883*−0.731*1

Notes: 1=consequences, 2=timeline, 3=personal control, 4=treatment control, 5= identity, 6=concern, 7=understanding, 8=emotional representation. *P<0.01 (2-tailed).

Table 5

Correlation Between Illness Perception, LUTS, and Depressive Symptoms

VariablesConsequencesTimelinePersonal ControlTreatment ControlIdentityConcernIllness CoherenceEmotions
LUTS0.528*0.417*−0.464*−0.473*0.457*0.479*−0.525*0.512*
LUTS timeline (month)0.622*0.739*−0.508*−0.568*0.606*0.554*−0.462*0.573*
Depressive symptoms0.875*0.668*−0.647*−0.715*0.779*0.871*−0.701*0.878*

Note: *P<0.01 (2-tailed).

Abbreviation: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms.

Comparison of LUTS and IPs Between Different BPH Patients with Depressive Symptoms Note: *P<0.001 (2-tailed). Abbreviations: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; IPs, illness perceptions. Comparison of Depressive Symptoms and IPs Between Different BPH Patients with LUTS Note: *P<0.001 (2-tailed). Abbreviations: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; IP, illness perceptions. Intercorrelations Between Chinese B-IPQ Subscales Among BPH Patients Notes: 1=consequences, 2=timeline, 3=personal control, 4=treatment control, 5= identity, 6=concern, 7=understanding, 8=emotional representation. *P<0.01 (2-tailed). Correlation Between Illness Perception, LUTS, and Depressive Symptoms Note: *P<0.01 (2-tailed). Abbreviation: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms. There was a very weak negative correlation between the depressive symptoms and the level of education (r = –0.339) (p˂0.001). Results showed that the level of education was negatively associated with negative IPs included consequences (r = −0.400), timeline (r = −0.282), identity (r = −0.241), emotions (r = −0.304) (p˂0.001), but positively associated with positive IPs included personal control (r = 0.299), treatment control (r = 0.271) and illness coherence (r = 0.497) (p˂0.01) (See Table 6).
Table 6

Correlations Between Depression Illness Perception Variables and Personal Characteristics

VariablesConsequencesTimelinePersonal ControlTreatment ControlIdentityConcernIllness CoherenceEmotionsDepression
Age0.0950.151−0.132−0.1220.177*0.130−0.1290.1540.128
BMI−0.013−0.0800.060−0.025−0.103−0.055−0.001−0.0100.006
Education−0.400***−0.282***0.299***0.271***−0.241**−0.351***0.497***−0.304***−0.339***
Current smoker0.0400.088−0.0150.0080.0270.0130.021−0.0250.052
Alcohol use0.0230.1400.016−0.0270.0340.0180.002−0.0100.029
Marital status0.0040.067−0.10−0.014−0.0330.1130.0230.0830.030
PSA (ng/mL)0.0810.064−0.036−0.0410.0630.051−0.0020.0650.031
PV (mL)−0.0520.063−0.0810.030−0.043−0.0880.049−0.057−0.094

Note: Values are the correlation coefficients; *P<0.05 (2-tailed), **P<0.01 (2-tailed), ***P<0.001 (2-tailed).

Abbreviation: PV, prostate volume.

Correlations Between Depression Illness Perception Variables and Personal Characteristics Note: Values are the correlation coefficients; *P<0.05 (2-tailed), **P<0.01 (2-tailed), ***P<0.001 (2-tailed). Abbreviation: PV, prostate volume.

The Effect of IPs on Depressive Symptoms Among BPH Patients with LUTS

A hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with depressive symptoms among BPH patients with LUTS. In step 1, the severity and duration of LUTS was significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms, and explained 47.5% of the variance in depressive symptoms (F = 69.774, R2= 0.475, ΔR2= 0.475, P < 0.001). In step 2, the severity of LUTS and the negative IPs, including consequences, concern and emotions, were significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms, and explained 85.1% of the variance (F = 46.131, R2= 0.851, ΔR2= 0.376, P < 0.05), also explained a further 37.6% of the variance in depressive symptoms. Hence, the negative IPs, including consequences, concern and emotions may act as partial mediator in the association between LUTS and depressive symptoms (see Table 7).
Table 7

The Hierarchical Regression Analyses of Factors Related to Depressive Symptoms of the BPH Patients with LUTS

VariablesStep1Step2
BβtpBβtp
Constant−2.042−4.0020.000**−2.862−3.0910.002**
Consequences0.4250.3604.4550.000***
Timeline−0.083−0.050−0.8230.412
Personal control0.0890.0531.0740.284
Treatment control0.0680.0470.8360.404
Identity−0.079−0.063−0.9150.362
Concern0.4030.3023.8190.000***
Coherence−0.001−0.000−0.0080.994
Emotions0.4670.3704.4020.000***
LUTS0.1940.3866.1430.000***0.0470.0932.3790.019*
LUTS timeline (month)0.2040.4467.1040.000***0.0360.0791.5690.119
F69.7740.000***46.1310.000***
R20.4750.851
ΔR20.4750.376

Note: *<0.01, **<0.01, ***<0.001.

Abbreviation: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptom.

The Hierarchical Regression Analyses of Factors Related to Depressive Symptoms of the BPH Patients with LUTS Note: *<0.01, **<0.01, ***<0.001. Abbreviation: LUTS, lower urinary tract symptom.

Discussion

The present study aimed at investigating whether LUTS is associated with depressive symptoms and whether IPs mediate the correlation between LUTS and depressive symptoms. The results of correlation analysis indicated a strong correlation between IPs, depressive symptoms and LUTS among BPH patients. Moreover, the mediation analysis demonstrated that the IPs may mediate the relationship between the severity of depressive symptoms and LUTS among BPH patients. Several longitudinal follow-up studies evaluated the impact of BPH on the risk of developing depression. The prospective study conducted by Chung et al found that the presence of moderate-to-severe LUTS measured by the IPSS at baseline were significantly associated with an increased risk of depression measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale to assess depression in elderly men at 2-year follow-up.28 In addition, the 1-year-longitudinal, population-based investigation conducted by Huang et al found that the likelihood of being diagnosed with depressive disorder was 1.87 times higher in patients with BPH than with matched controls.29 The relationship between LUTS and depressive symptoms is complex and has shown a reciprocal or bidirectional relationship. Several studies have demonstrated that LUTS can induce depressive symptoms in patients with BPH. A large, cross-sectional, population-based study demonstrated that men with moderate-to-severe depression had a higher odds of LUTS.30 There are several mechanisms that account for the relationship between depression and LUTS secondary to BPH, however the direction of causation is not well understood. The pathophysiology of BPH, including chronic inflammatory (eg C-reactive protein, interleukin-6) and genetic mechanism (eg PDE11A gene) may contribute to the depression of patients with BPH/LUTS.31–34 In the psychology aspect, LUTS can lead to embarrassment, restriction of daily activities and impaired physical state, and discourage sexual activity may also increase odds of depression.35 Our correlation analysis showed significantly positive association between the LUTS scores and negative IPs, indicating that with increasing symptom severity the levels of negative IPs also increase. Individuals experienced more disease-related symptoms might generate more negative cognitions and belief of their disease, which are IPs. The current research is consistent with previous studies that the higher disease activity is associated with poorer IPs.36 Thoughts of serious consequences of their disease tended to generate greater levels of perceived stress, finally converted into negative psychological distress.37,38 Consistent with the past study by Price et al that IPs (eg identity, concern, consequences, personal control, and emotion) were associated with depressive symptom in a population with advanced disease receiving palliative care, however, the causal domain had no impact on depression.39 Moreover, our previous study conducted on patients with bladder cancer demonstrated that negative IPs were positively correlated with the severity of depressive symptoms.40 Overall, individuals with negative IPs from illness experienced greater levels of perceived stress, which had an impact on the physical and mental health.38 The findings of our study are also in line with the body of research demonstrating the mediational role of IPs in depression. According to the CSM theory, individuals may generate different IPs for the same disease depending on their own clinical symptoms. In our study, the relationship between the severity of LUTS and depressive symptoms was mediated by emotional dimension. These findings suggests that negative emotional perceptions may facilitate feelings of hopelessness and sadness. The causal beliefs affected emotional reactions, coping strategies, illness behavior, and comorbid depression.41 Interestingly, the consequences and concerns of IPs also mediate the relationship between the severity of LUTS and depressive symptoms. In contrast to our hypothesis, the mediation effect of identity about the illness on the relationship between LUTS and depression was not found. In addition, Yankouskaya et al found that cognitive dimension of IPs, including consequences and identity, mediated the association between symptom activity and pain.42 The Common Sense Model can account for the psychological reactions of patients who report being unaware of their cancer diagnosis, and illness coherence mediated the relationship between awareness of a cancer diagnosis and anxiety.43 The mediational function of IPs is complex and controversial. The study conducted by Knowles et al provided the evidence that maladaptive coping acted as a strong and significant mediator between IPs and depressive symptoms.44 However, the study conducted by Zhang et al23 showed IPs did not have definite direct impact on coping strategies; however, the direct influence of IPs on stress and maladaptive coping were found. Overall, our findings may provide further evidence for the important mediation effects of IPs on perceived depressive symptoms. IPs are modifiable, and maladaptive perceptions can be improved by cognitive behavioral therapy. Cognitive behavioural therapy improved IPs in patients with functional somatic syndromes, thus improving physical health, somatic symptoms and illness worry.45 In a randomized controlled trial of patients with IBD, compared with the control group, those who received acceptance and commitment therapy reported greater improvements in perceived stress and depression.46 Our results suggest treatments aimed at improving individual IPs may be used by physicians to help BPH patients suffering from LUTS in improving the psychological distress. The current study had several limitations. First, given the cross-sectional design, the present study was preliminary, and did not verify the direction of causality between the LUTS and depressive symptoms. The study presented a relationship between IPs and LUTS, however, additional factors (eg coping) that may explain the relationship was not assessed. Second, the generalizability of our findings was limited by the small size sample and lack of age-matched controls. Third, since the current study lacked a control group and interventions (eg CBT), further study is required to confirm these findings. Overall, LUTS secondary to BPH induces depressive symptoms in patients, which in turn exacerbates LUTS and results in worsening depression. BPH/LUTS and depressive symptoms may show a reciprocal/bidirectional relationship. This preliminary evidence supports the validity of IPs and highlights the importance of interventions that may break the link between depressive symptoms and LUTS by reducing negative IPs. By identifying which IPs are associated with depression, medical professionals can provide some targeted interventions to focus on these specific areas, which can help BPH patients cope with their illness and improve depressive symptoms.
  46 in total

1.  Illness perceptions, adjustment to illness, and depression in a palliative care population.

Authors:  Annabel Price; Laura Goodwin; Lauren Rayner; Emma Shaw; Penny Hansford; Nigel Sykes; Barbara Monroe; Irene Higginson; Matthew Hotopf; William Lee
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Changes in illness perceptions mediated the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy in severe functional somatic syndromes.

Authors:  Sara Sletten Christensen; Lisbeth Frostholm; Eva Ørnbøl; Andreas Schröder
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Illness perception and affective symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer patients: A moderated mediation analysis of meaning in life and coping.

Authors:  Dariusz Krok; Ewa Telka; Beata Zarzycka
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management.

Authors:  Howard Leventhal; L Alison Phillips; Edith Burns
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 5.  Depression and prostate cancer: A focused review for the clinician.

Authors:  Gagan Fervaha; Jason P Izard; Dean A Tripp; Selina Rajan; Darryl P Leong; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Health-related quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: the mediation effects of illness perceptions and coping.

Authors:  Sheng-Yu Fan; Christine Eiser; Ming-Chih Ho; Cheng-Yao Lin
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression.

Authors:  Andrew H Miller; Vladimir Maletic; Charles L Raison
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Validation of the International Prostate Symptom Score in Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Edmond P H Choi; Cindy L K Lam; Weng-Yee Chin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Depression is a major risk factor for the development of dementia in people with lower urinary tract symptoms: A nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Ming-Jung Ou; Chun-Che Huang; Yi-Chi Wang; Yung-Liang Chen; Chung-Han Ho; Ming-Ping Wu; Yu-Tung Huang; Chien-Yi Wu; Ping-Jen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Men With Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Are at Increased Risk of Depression.

Authors:  Won Sik Jeong; Hong Yong Choi; Ji Won Nam; Shin Ah Kim; Bo Youl Choi; Hong Sang Moon; Kyu Shik Kim
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.