| Literature DB >> 34886551 |
Gugulethu Moyo1, Esteban Montenegro-Montenegro2, Zachary Stickley3, Abdulkadir Egal4, Wilna Oldewage-Theron1,5.
Abstract
This study utilised a structural equation model to examine the relationship between diet quality, socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in South African learners. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the indirect effects model for diet, socioeconomic status, diet quality and cardiovascular risk using pre-existing cross-sectional data. The structural equation model was fit using Lavaan version 0.6-5 in R version 3.6.1. Data were analysed from 178 children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years, from five rural schools in Cofimvaba, South Africa. Latent variables were created for dietary quality, dyslipidaemia and the socioeconomic status of participants. A negative association was observed between socioeconomic status and dyslipidaemia in school-aged children (p = 0.029).Entities:
Keywords: children; diet quality; disparities; health; non-communicable; socioeconomic
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34886551 PMCID: PMC8657719 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Hypothesised model.
Descriptive statistics for observed variables.
| Variable | Mean | Standard Deviation | Reference Values | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit FGDS a | 2.257 (32 g/day) | ±1.79 | 400 g/day of fruit and vegetables [ | Low |
| Vegetable FGDS a | 3.046 (24 g/day) | ±1.98 | Low | |
| Added Sugar (grams) | 36.74 | ±31.52 | 12–25 g/day [ | High |
| Total Fat (g) and Total Energy (TE) | 48.11 g (25.4% TE) | ±33.22 | 25–35% TE depending on age [ | Moderate |
| Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) | 7.932 | ±1.17 | 7–9 food groups [ | High |
| Total Serum Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 127.02 | ±26.52 | <170 mg/dL [ | Good |
| Serum LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) b | 68.12 | ±24.61 | <100 mg/dL [ | Good |
a Food group diversity score (FGDS); b low-density lipoprotein (LDL).
Figure 2Structural equation model of the relationship between diet quality, socioeconomic status and dyslipidaemia in children. * Statistical significance = p < 0.05.
Relationship between latent variables and their indicators.
| Latent Variable | Indicator | Factor Loading | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| SES | Employment | 0.380 | 0.026 * |
| SES | Income | 0.380 | 0.026 * |
| Diet Quality | Fruit FGDS a | 0.728 | <0.001 * |
| Diet Quality | Vegetable FGDS a | 0.700 | <0.001 * |
| Diet Quality | Added Sugar | 0.268 | <0.001 * |
| Diet Quality | Dietary Diversity Score | 0.582 | <0.001 * |
| Diet Quality | Total Fat Intake | 0.373 | <0.001 * |
| Dyslipidaemia | Total Serum Cholesterol | 0.923 | <0.001 * |
| Dyslipidaemia | Serum LDL-Cholesterol b | 0.883 | <0.001 * |
* Statistical significance = p < 0.05. a Food group diversity score (FGDS); b low-density lipoprotein (LDL).
Structural equation model of the relationships between socioeconomic status, diet quality and dyslipidaemia.
| Pathway | Association | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| a Socioeconomic status and Dyslipidaemia | −0.734 | 0.029 * |
| a Socioeconomic status and diet quality | −0.284 | 0.208 |
| b Dyslipidaemia and diet quality | 0.091 | 0.159 |
* Statistical significance = p < 0.05. a Covariance; b regression coefficient.
Model Fit.
| Model | χ2 | df | RMSEA | RMSEA 90% CI | SRMR | CFI | TLI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEM | 53.740 | 32 | 0.062 | 0.031–0.090 | 0.065 | 0.903 | 0.891 |
| Acceptable | Acceptable | Good | Mediocre/OK | ||||