| Literature DB >> 34886018 |
Michele Vitacca1, Adriana Olivares2, Laura Comini2, Giuliana Vezzadini3, Annamaria Langella4, Alberto Luisa4, Anna Petrolati3, Gianluigi Frigo3, Mara Paneroni1.
Abstract
The role that oxygen desaturation plays in exercise tolerance and its rehabilitative implications in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are unclear. We aimed to test exercise tolerance and oxygen saturation levels both during exercise and at night in PD patients to better define their rehabilitative needs. In clinically stable PD patients, undergoing inpatient rehabilitation, and in "ON" phase, we prospectively assessed clinical data, sleepiness, comorbidities, PD severity (Hoehn&Yahr, HY), motor function (ADLs, UPDRSII and UPDRSIII, Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure), balance, spirometry, respiratory muscles (MIP/MEP), peak cough expiratory flow (PCEF), continuous night oxygen monitoring, and meters at 6MWT. Of 55 patients analyzed (28 with moderate-severe PD, HY ≥ 2.5), 37% and 23% showed moderate-severe impairment on UPDRSII and UPDRSIII, respectively; 96% had reduced exercise tolerance and severe respiratory muscles impairment (MIP/MEP < 45% pred.); 21.8% showed desaturations during exercise; and 12.7% showed nocturnal desaturations. At multiple regression, low exercise tolerance and low mean nocturnal and exercise-induced saturation correlated with several respiratory and motor function and disability indices (all p < 0.03). Exercise tolerance, exercise-induced desaturations, and nocturnal desaturations were extremely frequent in PD patients and were worse in more severe PD patients. This suggests considering a combined role for motor and respiratory rehabilitation in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; exercise tolerance; oxygen saturation; rehabilitation; respiratory function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34886018 PMCID: PMC8656612 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of the study. Legend: MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; PD = Parkinson’s disease; HY = Hoehn and Yahr staging scale.
Characteristics of PD patients at admission: results for the overall sample and mild vs. moderate–severe subgroups.
| Overall | Group 1: | Group 2: |
| Delta | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 73 (68–79) | 72 (67–76) | 75 (70–79) | 0.1878 | ||
| Male, % | 53 | 59 | 46 | 0.4948 | ||
| BMI, Kg/m2 | 25.2 (22.9–29.9) | 24.3 (22.8–27.1) | 26.7 (23.4–31.3) | 0.0875 | ||
| Smokers, yes% | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 1.0000 | ||
| Ex-smokers, yes% | 18.9 | 19.2 | 18.5 | 1.0000 | ||
| CIRS1, score | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | 1.4 (1.2–1.5) | 1.6 (1.4–1.9) |
| 0.3 | 0.1; 0.4 |
| CIRS2, score | 2.0 (2.0–4.0) | 2.0 (1.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–4.2) |
| 1.0 | 1.0; 2.0 |
| Comorbidities, yes% | 64.2 | 65.4 | 63.0 | 1.0000 | ||
| COPD, yes% | 7.5 | 3.8 | 11.1 | 0.6105 | ||
| CHF, yes% | 1.9 | 3.8 | 0 | 0.4906 | ||
| Diabetes, yes% | 9.4 | 3.8 | 14.8 | 0.3507 | ||
| Hypertension, yes% | 34.0 | 26.9 | 40.7 | 0.3869 | ||
| Others, yes% | 43.4 | 34.6 | 51.8 | 0.2709 | ||
| MMSE, score | 27.4 (25.3–3.0) | 28.0 (25.3–30.0) | 27.0 (25.6–28.0) | 0.2263 | ||
| UPDRSII, score | 9 (6–18) | 7 (3–9) | 15 (9–22) |
| 7 | 3; 12 |
| UPDRSIII, score | 17 (11–28) | 13 (10–17) | 26 (16–44) |
| 14 | 5; 25 |
| Barthel Index, score | 95 (80–100) | 100 (97–100) | 80 (60–95) |
| −20 | −25; −10 |
| FIM, score | 113 (90–126) | 126 (104–126) | 91 (84–121) |
| −18 | −32; −6 |
| Berg balance, score | 44 (35–50) | 47 (42–50) | 38 (33–47) |
| −6 | −12; −1 |
| FEV1, % predicted | 95 (84–109) | 103 (90–113) | 93 (77–106) | 0.1947 | ||
| FVC, % predicted | 94 (81–109) | 98 (88–111) | 91 (77–104) |
| −12 | −24; −1 |
| FEV1/FVC, % | 79 (75–83) | 77 (74–81) | 81 (76–86) | 0.1424 | ||
| PEF, % predicted | 84 (65–104) | 93 (69–108) | 78 (63–98) | 0.1572 | ||
| MIP, % predicted | 43 (34–51) | 45 (37–51) | 41 (33–50) | 0.3773 | ||
| MEP, % predicted | 40 (30–50) | 42 (29–56) | 36 (31–48) | 0.5275 | ||
| PCEF, L/min | 300 (218–405) | 366 (247–448) | 282 (208–308) |
| −95 | −148; −18 |
| Night SatO2 ODI, n/h | 8.3 (2.9–15.3) | 4.3 (0.8–10.2) | 13.5 (6.6–22.8) |
| 7.3 | 2.8; 12.7 |
| Night SatO2 T90, % | 1.40 (0.15–8.30) | 0.40 (0.05–1.19) | 3.95 (1.78–16.50) |
| 2.60 | 1.34; 9.30 |
| Night SatO2 mean, % | 93.8 (92.3–95.5) | 94.9 (93.7–96.1) | 92.6 (91.9–94.6) |
| −2.1 | −3.3; −0.8 |
| Night SatO2 nadir, % | 83.0 (75.5–86.2) | 84.0 (76.0–88.0) | 82.0 (75.0–85.0) | 0.3684 | ||
| Nighttime Desaturators, n (%) | 7 (12.7) | 2 (7.4) | 5 (17.6) | 0.4216 | ||
| 6MWT, % predicted | 56 (39–65) | 63 (57–68) | 41 (35–49) |
| −20 | −26; −12 |
| 6MWT SatO2 bas, % | 96.0 (94.7–97.0) | 96.5 (95.4–97.1) | 95.7 (93.8–96.5) |
| −1.0 | −2.0, 0.0 |
| 6MWT SatO2 mean, % | 94.5 (91.4–95.59) | 94.7 (92.5–96.3) | 94.0 (91.0–95.0) | 0.2894 | ||
| 6MWT SatO2 nadir, % | 91 (86–93) | 92 (87–94) | 91 (85–93) | 0.3219 | ||
| 6MWT Borg pre, score | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0.0950 | ||
| 6MWT Borg post, score | 3 (2–3) | 3 (2–3) | 3 (2–4) | 0.3261 | ||
| Exercise Desaturators, n (%) | 12 (21.8) | 7 (25.9) | 5 (17.9) | 1.0000 | ||
| PDSS, score | 102 (85–123) | 110 (95–126) | 92 (79–115) | 0.1112 | ||
| Epworth, score | 5 (3–9) | 5 (3–8) | 5 (3–12) | 0.3804 |
Legend: values expressed as median (interquartile range) or percentage. HY = Hoehn and Yahr staging scale; BMI = Body mass index; COPD = Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CHF = Chronic heart failure; CIRS = Cumulative Illness Rating Scale severity (CIRS1) and comorbidity (CIRS2); MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; FIM = Functional Independence Measure; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume at 1 s; FVC= Forced vital capacity; PEF = Peak expiratory flow; MIP = Maximal inspiratory pressure; MEP = Maximal expiratory pressure; PCEF = Peak cough expiratory flow; ODI = Oxygen desaturation index; 6MWT = 6 min walking distance; 6MWT = 6-min walk test; PDSS = Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale. In bold font, p < 0.05.
Figure 2Distribution of patients according to level of performance at 6MWT: normal (≥80% pred.), moderately reduced (50–80% pred.) and severely reduced (<50% pred.). Legend: 6MWT = 6 min walking distance.
Multiple regression analysis on outcomes as dependent variables: exercise tolerance (expressed as 6MWT% of predicted value), Night mean SpO2, and 6MWT mean SpO2.
| Dependent Variables | Independent Variables | Estimated Beta | Standardized Beta | Adjusted R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6MWT% of pred. |
|
| |||
| (Intercept) | 25.948 | 0.1904 | |||
| CIRS1 | −11.918 | −0.258 | 0.0560 ° | ||
| Barthel Index | 0.244 | 0.294 | 0.0246 * | ||
| FVC% pred. | 0.159 | 0.262 | 0.0683 ° | ||
| PCEF (L/min) | 0.029 | 0.229 | 0.0450 * | ||
| Night mean SpO2 |
|
| |||
| (Intercept) | 80.101 | <0.0001 *** | |||
| BMI | −0.138 | −0.290 | 0.0056 ** | ||
| CIRS1 | −3.2541 | −0.438 | 0.0002 *** | ||
| 6MWT mean SpO2 | 0.240 | 0.326 | 0.0031 ** | ||
| 6MWT mean SpO2 |
|
| |||
| (Intercept) | 9.734 | 0.5930 | |||
| Sex M | 1.791 | ------ | 0.0228 * | ||
| Age | 0.109 | 0.236 | 0.0431 * | ||
| BMI | 0.190 | 0.292 | 0.0150 * | ||
| Barthel Index | 0.049 | 0.268 | 0.0265 * | ||
| FEV1% pred. | 0.065 | 0.363 | 0.0023 ** | ||
| Night mean SpO2 | 0.651 | 0.479 | 0.0006 *** |
Legend: 6MWT = 6 min walking distance; CIRS1 = Cumulative Illness Rating Scale severity; FVC = Forced vital capacity; PCEF = peak cough expiratory flow; BMI = Body mass index 6MWT = 6-min walk test; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume at 1 s; *** = <0.001; ** = <0.01; * = <0.05; ° = <0.1. Gaussian distribution of residuals was evaluated. In bold font, p and R2 of the different models.
Figure 3Percentage of patients not presenting oxygen desaturation (no OD), presenting exercise-induced desaturation only (only EID), nocturnal desaturation only (only ND), and both exercise and nocturnal desaturation (both).