| Literature DB >> 34885903 |
Jérémy Ternel1, Adrien Lopes1,2, Mathieu Sauthier2, Clothilde Buffe3, Vincent Wiatz3, Hervé Bricout1, Sébastien Tilloy1, Eric Monflier1.
Abstract
Isosorbide and its functionalized derivatives have numerous applications as bio-sourced building blocks. In this context, the synthesis of diols from isosorbide diallyl ether by hydrohydroxymethylation reaction is of extreme interest. This hydrohydroxymethylation, which consists of carbon-carbon double bonds converting into primary alcohol functions, can be obtained by a hydroformylation reaction followed by a hydrogenation reaction. In this study, reductive hydroformylation was achieved using isosorbide diallyl ether as a substrate in a rhodium/amine catalytic system. The highest yield in bis-primary alcohols obtained was equal to 79%.Entities:
Keywords: catalysis; hydroformylation; hydrogenation; rhodium; tandem reaction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885903 PMCID: PMC8658770 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Reactions of isosorbide diallyl ether (IDE) in the presence of the [Rh(acac)(CO)2/NR3] catalytic system and under CO/H2 pressure. (a) General equation; (b) different possible groups linked to the isosorbide moiety; (c) two possible retro-Michael reactions; and (d) determination of the total number of possible compounds in the reaction medium. The various groups are allyl (2-P), propyl (P), (Z)- or (E)-1-propenyl (1-P), 3-formylpropyl (3-FP), (R)- or (S)-2-formylpropyl (2-FP), 4-hydroxybutyl (4-HB), (R)- or (S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)propyl (2-HMP), and a hydrogen atom (RM). (1-FP) and (1-HMP) groups are not formed because (1-P) group was proven to be unreactive in our experimental conditions (see Scheme 2).
Scheme 2(a) Synthesis of isosorbide bis(1-propenyl) ether from isosorbide diallyl ether and (b) comparison of these two compounds behaviors under rhodium-catalyzed hydrohydroxymethylation conditions.
Figure 11H NMR spectrum of the final HHM reaction medium of isosorbide diallyl ether (IDE) after evaporation of triethylamine and toluene (300 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C); experimental conditions: Rh(acac)(CO)2 (12.9 mg, 50 μmol, 1 equiv), TEA (200 equiv), IDE (2.26 g, 10 mmol, 200 equiv), toluene (6 mL), 80 bars of CO/H2 (1:1), 80 °C, 4 h; the values of integration of the different chemical shift zones (zones A to H) were used to determine conversion and yields (see part IV.2 of Supplementary Materials).
Influence of the TEA amount on IDE hydrohydroxymethylation .
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | TEA/Rh | t (h) | Conv. | Y(P)
| Y(1-P)
| Y(ALD)
| Y(PA)
| Y(RM)
| Y’(BPA)
|
| 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 18 | 100 | 9 | 3 | 82 [50/50] | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 95 | 2 | 12 | 21 [45/55] | 54 [38/62] | 6 | 38 [12/40/48] |
| 4 | 20 | 6 | 100 | 2 | 4 | 22 [45/55] | 67 [40/60] | 5 | 44 [12/46/42] |
| 5 | 50 | 6 | 100 | 2 | 7 | 6 [49/51] | 80 [45/55] | 5 | 63 [17/49/34] |
| 6 | 100 | 6 | 100 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 87 [45/55] | 6 | 67 [17/50/33] |
| 7 | 200 | 6 | 100 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 87 [44/56] | 6 | 69 [17/49/34] |
| 8 | 1200 | 18 | 100 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 85 [43/57] | 6 | 62 [16/49/35] |
| 9 | 20 | 4 | 79 | 2 | 3 | 38 [50/50] | 30 [40/60] | 5 | 22 [12/43/45] |
| 10 | 20 | 18 | 100 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 89 [46/54] | 4 | 67 [17/50/33] |
| 11 | 200 | 4 | 95 | 1 | 4 | 16 [48/52] | 70 [46/54] | 4 | 49 [17/48/35] |
| 12 | 200 | 18 | 100 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 86 [45/55] | 6 | 67 [17/79/34] |
Experimental conditions: Rh(acac)(CO)2 (12.9 mg, 50 μmol, 1 equiv), IDE (2.26 g, 10 mmol, 200 equiv), TEA (0–1200 equiv), toluene (6 mL), 80 bars of CO/H2 (1:1), 80 °C. Conv. = allyl groups conversion determined by 1H NMR. Y = yield in (X) with respect to the initial allyl group, determined by 1H NMR; (P) = propyl; (1-P) = 1-propenyl; (ALD) = aldehyde groups = (2-FP) + (3-FP); (PA) = primary alcohol groups = (2-HMP) + (4-HB); (RM) = (2-FP) grafts that have been cleaved by retro-Michael reaction. Linear to branched ratio for aldehydes i.e., (3-FP)/(2-FP) molar ratio. Linear to branched ratio for primary alcohols i.e., (4-HB)/(2-HMP) molar ratio. Y’ = yield in bis-primary alcohols with respect to the initial isosorbide moiety, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID). linear-linear/linear-branched/branched-branched ratios for bis-primary alcohols, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID). 1 bar of N2 instead of 80 bars of CO/H2. 30 mmol of IDE instead of 10, and no toluene.
Scheme 3Amines and diamines used (pKa in brackets).
Influence of the nitrogen compound nature on IDE hydrohydroxymethylation
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Ligand | Conv. | Y(P)
| Y(1-P)
| Y(ALD)
| Y(PA)
| Y(RM)
| Y’(BPA)
|
| 1 | TEA (200) | 100 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 87 [44/56] | 6 | 69 [17/49/34] |
| 2 | TPA (200) | 100 | 9 | 2 | 80 [50/50] | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| 3 | TBA (200) | 100 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 84 [42/58] | 6 | 60 [16/48/36] |
| 4 | TMEDA (100) | 100 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 90 [46/54] | 6 | 74 [16/49/35] |
| 5 | TMPDA (100) | 100 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 89 [47/53] | 5 | 75 [15/48/37] |
| 6 | TMBDA (100) | 100 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 91 [46/54] | 7 | 79 [16/49/37] |
| 7 | TMEDA (200) | 100 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 90 [46/54] | 5 | 75 [15/48/37] |
| 8 | TMPDA (200) | 100 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 90 [47/53] | 6 | 76 [16/48/36] |
| 9 | TMBDA (200) | 100 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 91 [46/54] | 5 | 79 [16/49/37] |
Experimental conditions: Rh(acac)(CO)2 (12.9 mg, 50 μmol, 1 equiv), IDE (2.26 g, 10 mmol, 200 equiv), Nitrogen compound (10–200 equiv), toluene (6 mL), 80 bars of CO/H2 (1:1), 80 °C, 6 h. Conv. = allyl groups conversion determined by 1H NMR. Y = yield in (X) with respect to the initial allyl group, determined by 1H NMR; (P) = propyl; (1-P) = 1-propenyl; (ALD) = aldehyde groups = (2-FP) + (3-FP); (PA) = primary alcohol groups = (2-HMP) + (4-HB); (RM) = (2-FP) grafts that have been cleaved by the retro-Michael reaction. Linear to branched ratio for aldehydes i.e., (3-FP)/(2-FP) molar ratio. Linear to branched ratio for primary alcohols i.e., (4-HB)/(2-HMP) molar ratio. Y’ = yield in bis-primary alcohols with respect to the initial isosorbide moiety, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID). Linear-linear/linear-branched/branched-branched ratios for bis-primary alcohols, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID).
Influence of syngas pressure and composition on IDE hydrohydroxymethylation
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Ligand (equiv/Rh) | P (bar) | Conv. | Y(P)
| Y(1-P)
| Y(ALD)
| Y(PA)
| Y(RM)
| Y’(BPA)
|
| 1 | TEA (200) | 80 (1:1) | 100 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 87 [44/56] | 6 | 69 [17/49/34] |
| 2 | TEA (200) | 80 (1:2) | 100 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 87 [45/55] | 6 | 69 [17/48/35] |
| 3 | TEA (200) | 60 (1:1) | 100 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 80 [48/52] | 5 | 60 [20/51/29] |
| 4 | TEA (200) | 40 (1:1) | 85 | 2 | 18 | 13 [48/52] | 48 [45/55] | 4 | 22 [17/48/35] |
| 5 | TMPDA (100) | 80 (1:1) | 100 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 89 [47/53] | 5 | 75 [15/48/37] |
| 6 | TMPDA (100) | 80 (1:2) | 100 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 88 [48/52] | 7 | 74 [16/49/37] |
| 7 | TMBDA (100) | 80 (1:1) | 100 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 91 [46/54] | 7 | 79 [16/49/37] |
| 8 | TMBDA (100) | 80 (1:2) | 100 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 87 [46/54] | 7 | 78 [15/49/36] |
Experimental conditions: Rh(acac)(CO)2 (12.9 mg, 50 μmol, 1 equiv), IDE (2.26 g, 10 mmol, 200 equiv), Nitrogen compound (100–200 equiv), toluene (6 mL), CO/H2 (1:1 or 1:2; 40–80 bar), 80 °C, 6 h. Conv. = allyl groups conversion determined by 1H NMR. Y = yield in (X) with respect to the initial allyl group, determined by 1H NMR; (P) = propyl; (1-P) = 1-propenyl; (ALD) = aldehyde groups = (2-FP) + (3-FP); (PA) = primary alcohol groups = (2-HMP) + (4-HB); (RM) = (2-FP) grafts that have been cleaved by the retro-Michael reaction. Linear to branched ratio for aldehydes i.e., (3-FP)/(2-FP) molar ratio. Linear to branched ratio for primary alcohols i.e., (4-HB)/(2-HMP) molar ratio. Y’ = yield in bis-primary alcohols with respect to the initial isosorbide moiety, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID). Linear-linear/linear-branched/branched-branched ratios for bis-primary alcohols, determined by gas chromatography (GC-FID).