| Literature DB >> 34885900 |
Fu-Qiang Bi1, Yi-Fen Luo1, Jun-Lin Zhang1,2, Huan Huo1, Bo-Zhou Wang1.
Abstract
Rearrangement reactions are efficient strategies in organic synthesis and contribute enormously to the development of energetic materials. Here, we report on the preparation of a fused energetic structure of 7-nitro-3,5-dihydro-4H-pyrazolo[4,3-d][1,2,3]triazin-4-one (NPTO) based on a novel Hofmann-type rearrangement. The 1,2,3-triazine unit was introduced into the fused bicyclic skeleton from a pyrazole unit for the first time. The new compound of NPTO was fully characterized using multinuclear NMR and IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis as well as X-ray diffraction studies. The thermal behaviors and detonation properties of NPTO were investigated through a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-TG) approach and EXPLO5 program-based calculations, respectively. The calculation results showed similar detonation performances between NPTO and the energetic materials of DNPP and ANPP, indicating that NPTO has a good application perspective in insensitive explosives and propellants.Entities:
Keywords: Hofmann-type rearrangement; NPTO; crystal; mechanism; synthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885900 PMCID: PMC8659268 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Curtius rearrangement in the synthesis of energetic materials.
Figure 2Hofmann rearrangement and the synthesis of NPTO.
Scheme 1Synthetic routes towards NPTO.
Crystallographic details of NPTO∙2H2O.
| Compound | NPTO∙2H2O |
|---|---|
| Formula | C4H6N6O5 |
| Formula weight | 218.15 |
| T (K) | 296(2) |
| λ (Å) | 0.71073 |
| Crystal system | Monoclinic |
| Space group | |
| a (Å) | 6.608(3) |
| b (Å) | 9.330(4) |
| c (Å) | 13.998(6) |
| Volume (Å3) | 855.7(7) |
| Z | 4 |
| Dc (g/cm3) | 1.693 |
| F (000) | 448 |
| θ range/(°) | 2.63 to 25.09 |
| Reflections collected/unique | 4177/1519 [R(int) = 0.0623] |
| Refinement method | Full-matrix least-squares on F2 |
| GOF on F2 | 1.002 |
| Final R indexes (I > 2σ(I)) | R1 = 0.0560, |
| Final R indexes (all data) | R1 = 0.1058, |
| Largest diff peak and hole (e Å−3) | 0.322 and −0.222 |
| GOF on F2 | 0.949 |
| CCDC number | 2082280 |
Figure 3Molecular structure of NPTO∙2H2O and its crystal packing.
Figure 4DSC-TG experiments of NPTO∙2H2O.
Figure 5DSC experiments of NPTO∙2H2O at different heating rates.
Thermodynamic parameters of the thermal decomposition process of NPTO.
| Heating Rates | lg( | Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | 176.94 | 429.14 | 27.33 | 173.33 | 427.70 |
| 5 | 179.7 | ||||
| 10 | 183.0 | ||||
| 15 | 183.88 |
Figure 6ESP-mapped surfaces of DNPP (a) and NPTO (b).
Figure 7SEM Morphology graphs of NPTO.
Calculated physico-chemical properties and detonation parameters of NPTO.
| Compound | Δ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPP | 1.678 | 283.28 | 7317 | 19.79 | 44.63 | 10.94 |
| DNPP | 1.758 | 290.44 | 8068 | 26.96 | 33.98 | 8.32 |
| NPTO | 1.752 | 217.13 | 7556 | 22.32 | 40.44 | 9.91 |
a Crystal density. b Molar enthalpy of formation. c Detonation velocity. d Detonation pressure. e Impact sensitivity. f Friction sensitivity.