| Literature DB >> 34885852 |
Alexandra Raschitor1, Alberto Romero1, Sandra Sanches2,3, Vanessa J Pereira2,3, Joao G Crespo4, Javier Llanos1.
Abstract
Along with rapid social development, the use of insecticides and caffeine-containing products increases, a trend that is also reflected in the composition of surface waters. This study is focused on the phototreatment of a surface water containing three neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin) and caffeine. Firstly, the radiation absorption of the target pollutants and the effect of the water matrix components were evaluated. It was observed that the maximum absorption peaks appear at wavelengths ranging from 246 to 274 nm, and that the water matrix did not affect the efficiency of the removal of the target pollutants. It was found that the insecticides were efficiently removed after a very short exposure to UV irradiation, while the addition of hydrogen peroxide was needed for an efficient caffeine depletion. The electrical energy per order was estimated, being the lowest energy required (9.5 kWh m-3 order-1) for the depletion of thiamethoxan by indirect photolysis, and a concentration of hydrogen peroxide of 5 mg dm-3. Finally, a preliminary evaluation on the formation of by-products reveals that these compounds play a key role in the evolution of the ecotoxicity of the samples, and that the application of direct photolysis reduces the concentration of these intermediates.Entities:
Keywords: advanced oxidation process; caffeine; direct photolysis; drinking water treatment; ecotoxicity; neonicotinoids
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885852 PMCID: PMC8659205 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Decadic molar extinction coefficient of the pollutants.
Figure 2Influence of the water matrix on the pollutant removal by direct photolysis. (a) DW; (b) SW. ♦—caffeine; ■—insecticides mix.
Figure 3Pollutant removal using SW: ▲—caffeine; ■—imidacloprid; ●—clothianidin; ♦—thiamethoxam.
Figure 4Influence of the H2O2 addition on the removal of pollutants from the mixture: (a) caffeine; (b) thiamethoxam; (c) clothianidin; (d) imidacloprid. H2O2 concentration: ■—5 mg dm−3; *—10 mg dm−3; ▲—15 mg dm−3; ♦—30 mg dm−3; ●—60 mg dm−3.
Values of direct and indirect photolysis rate constants obtained and correlation coefficients (R2) for the time-based pseudo-first-order kinetics for the degradation of the target pollutants. DP: Direct Photolysis.
| Pollutant | DP | 5 mg dm−3 | 10 mg dm−3 | 15 mg dm−3 | 30 mg dm−3 | 60 mg dm−3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | R2 | K | R2 | K | R2 | K | R2 | K | R2 | K | R2 | |
| Caffeine |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| Thiamethoxam |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.98 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| Clothianidin |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| Imidacloprid |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
| 0.99 |
Values of the electrical energy per order (EEO, kWh m−3 order−1) for the degradation of the target pollutants using direct and indirect photolysis. DP: Direct Photolysis.
| Pollutant | DP | 5 mg dm−3 | 10 mg dm−3 | 15 mg dm−3 | 30 mg dm−3 | 60 mg dm−3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caffeine | 45,634.9 | 456.3 | 290.4 | 106.5 | 96.8 | 96.8 |
| Thiamethoxam | 12.1 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 12.0 | 14.2 | 13.7 |
| Clothianidin | 19.0 | 16.1 | 15.7 | 21.6 | 21.0 | 20.7 |
| Imidacloprid | 22.2 | 19.0 | 18.4 | 23.7 | 24.0 | 24.8 |
Figure 5Mobility loss of Daphnia magna crustaceans in the ecotoxicity test. Case 1: surface water and bovine liver catalase. Case 2: DP—10 min. Case 3: DP—20 min. Case 4: 15 mg dm−3 H2O2 pollutants—20 min. Case 5: 15 mg dm−3 H2O2—20 min. Control: raw SW.
Figure 6Overlaid chromatograms of samples from photolysis assay at time zero (blue line) and after 10 min of irradiation (black line). Arrows point to the formation of two possible by-products.