| Literature DB >> 34885765 |
Emilia Klimaszewska1, Malgorzata Zieba2, Klaudia Gregorczyk1, Leszek Markuszewski3.
Abstract
Traditional technologies applied for obtaining plant raw materials for cosmetic production are based primarily on high-level processing, which is reflected in the qualitative composition of the resulting materials. By using low-temperature drying, it is possible to retain in the raw materials a range of valuable ingredients. In this study, blue honeysuckle powder was used as an ingredient of cosmetic face masks. The stability of the masks was evaluated. Dynamic viscosity, yield point and texture analysis of the cosmetics was performed. The color of the emulsions and the level of skin hydration after face mask application was determined. Emulsions were found to be stable. A decrease in dynamic viscosity of the emulsions as a function of increasing concentrations of the additive and under the conditions of rising rotational speed were observed. Similarly, an increase in the concentration of blue honeysuckle in the emulsions resulted in a decrease in the value of the yield point. Based on the results, it can be stated that the addition of blue honeysuckle caused a decrease in hardness of the masks, while the opposite trend was observed for adhesive force. It was found that an increase in the concentration of blue honeysuckle gave a reddish-yellow color to the samples. Corneometric assessment confirmed proper skin hydration after the application of the emulsions.Entities:
Keywords: Lonicera caerulea fruit; blue honeysuckle; cosmetics; fruit powders; masks
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885765 PMCID: PMC8658987 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Comparison of freeze drying and MDP [28,29,30,31].
| Feature | Freezedrying | MDP Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Price | High | Low |
| Packaging | Special packaging | No specific packaging requirements |
| Waterremoval | Initial freezing followed by ice cube removal by conversion into water vapor | By evaporation with simultaneous comminution |
| Dryingtime | Additional drying between 3 and 6 h | About dozen minutes |
| Incorporation of additives (includingcarriers) | None | None |
| Stability of storage of resultingpowders | Unstable | Stable |
| Comminution | Before or after freeze drying | Simultaneously |
Results of visual evaluation of cosmetic masks containing different concentrations of blue honeysuckle powder after stress and centrifuge tests.
| Formulation | Parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stability | Homogeneity | Color | Odor | |
|
| Stable | Homogeneous | White | Neutral, noticeable oily odor |
|
| Visible particles of blue honeysuckle | Light pink | Noticeable delicate smell of blue honeysuckle | |
|
| ||||
|
| Pink | |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
Figure 1Dynamic viscosity of face masks with different concentrations of Lonicera caerulea Fruit Powder.
Figure 2Yield point of face masks with different concentrations of Lonicera caerulea Fruit Powder.
Figure 3Hardness and adhesive force as a function of Lonicera caerulea Fruit Powder concentration in face masks.
Results of colorimetric measurements of cosmetic masks with varying concentrations of Lonicera Caerulea Fruit Powder.
| Formulation | Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | Difference in Color | Difference in Hue | |
| FM_0 | 91.87 | −1.03 | 0.68 | - | - |
| FM_1 | 88.72 | 0.90 | 0.72 | −0.08 | 1.92 |
| FM_2 | 82.15 | 2.60 | 0.93 | 1.52 | 3.30 |
| FM_3 | 81.88 | 3.92 | 1.65 | 3.01 | 4.04 |
| FM_4 | 79.00 | 5.81 | 2.00 | 4.91 | 4.94 |
| FM_5 | 78.20 | 6.48 | 2.16 | 5.59 | 5.22 |
Figure 4Skin hydration level after the application of face masks with varying concentrations of Lonicera caerulea fruit powder.
Figure 5Picture of blue honeysuckle powder.
Figure 6Cosmetic masks containing varying concentrations of blue honeysuckle powder.
Formulations of cosmetic face masks with varying concentrations of blue honeysuckle powder.
| Phase | Ingredients [INCI] | Symbol of Mask | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM_0 | FM_1 | FM_2 | FM_3 | FM_4 | FM_5 | ||
| Concentration [% | |||||||
|
| Polyglyceryl-4 Laurate | 1.4 | |||||
| Cetearyl Alcohol | 6.0 | ||||||
| Glyceryl Stearate | 5.0 | ||||||
| Sweet Almond Oil | 2.0 | ||||||
| Cera Alba | 3.0 | ||||||
| Caprylic/Capric Triglicerides | 5.0 | ||||||
|
| Aqua | at 100 | |||||
| Urea | 1.0 | ||||||
|
| Sodium Benzoate and Potassium Sorbate | 1.0 | |||||
| Lactic Acid | to pH = 5.5 | ||||||
| Lonicera Caerulea Fruit Powder | - | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | |