| Literature DB >> 34885717 |
Elisabetta Rubini1,2,3, Marco Minacori1, Giuliano Paglia1, Alberto Macone1, Silvia Chichiarelli1, Fabio Altieri1, Margherita Eufemi1.
Abstract
The β-isomer of hexachlorocyclohexane (β-HCH) is a globally widespread pollutant that embodies all the physicochemical characteristics of organochlorine pesticides, constituting an environmental risk factor for a wide range of noncommunicable diseases. Previous in vitro studies from our group disclosed the carcinogenic potential of β-HCH, which contributes to neoplastic transformation by means of multifaceted intracellular mechanisms. Considering the positive evidence regarding the protective role of natural bioactive compounds against pollution-induced toxicity, micronutrients from olive and tomato endowed with the capability of modulating β-HCH cellular targets were tested. For this purpose, the solution obtained from a patented food supplement (No. EP2851080A1), referred to as Tomato and Olive Bioactive Compounds (TOBC), was administered to the androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells LNCaP and different biochemical and cellular assays were performed to evaluate its efficiency. TOBC shows a dose-dependent significant chemoprotection by contrasting β-HCH-induced intracellular responses such as STAT3 and AhR activation, disruption of AR signaling, antiapoptotic and proliferative activity, and increase in ROS production and DNA damage. These experimental outcomes identified TOBC as a suitable functional food to be included in a diet regimen aimed at defending cells from β-HCH negative effects, recommending the development of tailored enriched formulations for exposed individuals.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; environmental disease; environmental pollution; natural dietary compounds; organochlorine pesticides; signaling pathways; β-hexachlorocyclohexane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885717 PMCID: PMC8658925 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Table displays principal bioactive compounds in 1 mg/mL TOBC solution, indicating their respective concentrations, food sources, and cellular targets.
| Bioactive Compound | Concentration | Cellular Targets | Food Sources | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocopherol | 40 nM | Apoptosis induction, AR transcriptional | Oleaginous fruits, wheat seeds, green leafy | [ |
| Lycopene | 4.6 µM | Decreased PSA levels, antiproliferative activity, apoptosis, reduced clonogenic potential, reduction | Guava, watermelon, | [ |
| Tyrosol | 200 µM | STAT3 inhibition, AhR ligand, decrease in ROS | Olive oil, red wine | [ |
| Quercetin | 4.6 µM | STAT3 inhibition, reduced AR expression, decreased PSA levels, protective role against DNA damage, | Tomato, black elderberry, red wine, orange, capers, cloves, almond, onion, dark chocolate | [ |
| Secoiridoid aglycones | 150 µM | Modulation of redox homeostasis, cell apoptosis | Olive oil | [ |
| Verbascoside | 100 µM | Apoptosis promotion, inhibition of cell migration, STAT3 inhibition, protective role against | Olive oil, verbena | [ |
| Pinoresinol | 140 µM | Antioxidant, protective role against DNA damage, cell viability decrease. | Olive oil | [ |
Figure 1MTT assay performed on untreated LNCaP cells incubated for 48 h with TOBC solution (concentration ranging from 1 mg/mL up to 5 mg/mL) obtained from two different batches (No 1135 and No 1265). Impact of TOBC solutions on cell viability is comparable between two batches. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA using Bonferroni’s posthoc test, and obtained data are presented as mean ± SEM. The ANOVA test reveals that there is not a statistically significant interaction between the batches and the cell treatment (F(4,10) = 1.516; p = 0.2700), whereas TOBC concentration showed a statistically significant effect on cell viability (F (4,10) = 1009; p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences (**** p < 0.0001) are marked with asterisks and are referred to the control.
Figure 2MTT assay on LNCaP cells pretreated for 3 h with 1 mg/mL TOBC solution, and then incubated for 48 h with 10 μM β-HCH. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results and obtained values are reported as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences referred to control are marked with asterisks (*** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001); statistically significant differences between β-HCH and TOBC + β-HCH samples are marked with hashtags (#### p < 0.0001).
Figure 3Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence were performed to evaluate activation of STAT3 in LNCaP cells pretreated for 3 h with 1 mg/mL TOBC, and then for 4 h with 10 μM β-HCH. (A) Total protein extracts were subjected to Western Blot analysis. Immunoblot evidenced STAT3 phosphorylation (pY705-STAT3) upon treatment with β-HCH, whereas a decrease in band intensity occurs in sample pretreated with TOBC. Phosphorylation levels were referred to amount of total STAT3 present in each sample and were compared to control. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results and obtained values are reported as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences (**** p < 0.0001) are marked with asterisks and are referred to the control. (B) Cellular distribution of STAT3 followed by immunofluorescence in LNCaP cells. Images clearly show STAT3 nuclear localization in cells treated with β-HCH, but not in presence of TOBC. Selected images reported are representative of three independent experiments and were captured under same acquisition parameters. CTRL: Control untreated cells; β-HCH: Cells subjected to a 4 h stimulation with 10 µM β-HCH; TOBC: cells pretreated for 3 h with 1 mg/mL TOBC; TOBC+ β-HCH: cells pretreated for 3 h with 1 mg/mL TOBC and then for 4 h with 10 µM β-HCH.
Figure 4Cellular distribution of AhR followed by immunofluorescence in LNCaP cells. As displayed in the figures, receptor is only present in nuclei of cells treated with β-HCH alone, but not in presence of CH223191 nor TOBC. Selected images are representative of three independent experiments and were captured under same acquisition parameters CTR: control untreated cells; β-HCH: cells subjected to a 4 h stimulation with 10 µM β-HCH; β-HCH + CH223191: cells after 2 h pre-incubation with 150 nM CH223191, followed by 4 h of 10 µM β-HCH stimulation; TOBC+ β-HCH: cells pretreated 3 h with 1 mg/mL TOBC, and then for 4 h with 10 µM β-HCH. CH223191 was used as a positive control for AhR inhibition.
Figure 5Cellular distribution of AR followed by immunofluorescence in LNCaP cells. β-HCH induces AR nuclear localization, which is inhibited by both TOBC and bicalutamide. Selected images are representative of three independent experiments and were captured under same acquisition parameters. CTR: control untreated cells; β-HCH: cells subjected to a 4 h stimulation with 10 µM β-HCH; β-HCH + Bicalutamide: cells pretreated overnight with 120 nM Bicalutamide and then subjected to a 4 h stimulation with β-HCH; TOBC+ β-HCH: cells pretreated 3 h with TOBC 1 mg/mL, and then for 4 h with 10 µM β-HCH. Bicalutamide was used as a positive control for AR inhibition.
Figure 6Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting were carried out to determine TOBC protective activity towards oxidative stress. (A) TOBC exhibits antioxidant activity versus reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by β-HCH. Images and relative fluorescence quantification reported in histogram clearly show a reduction of ROS in presence of TOBC; treatment with 75 µM tBHP for 1 h was employed as a positive control for ROS production. Fluorescence intensity was quantified by averaging across CTCF (Corrected Total Cell Fluorescence) calculated with ImageJ on same number of cells from different images of each sample. Images were captured under same acquisition parameters and are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Immunoblot analysis of γH2A.X on total protein extracts obtained from LNCaP cells. Figure clearly shows that TOBC reduces H2A.X phosphorylation induced by β-HCH. Phosphorylation levels were measured on amount of β-actin present in each sample and were referred to control. (C) DNA damage was evaluated using Comet Assay. As shown in figure and confirmed by histogram, DNA fragmentation caused by β-HCH is reduced in presence of TOBC; 75 µM tBHP for 1 h was employed as a positive control for DNA fragmentation. Extent of DNA fragmentation was assessed by quantifying percentage of DNA in comet tail using Casp Lab software. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results and obtained values are presented as mean and standard deviation. CTRL: control (untreated cells); β-HCH: cells subjected to 6 h stimulation with 10 µM β-HCH; TOBC: Cells subjected to a 3 hours’ stimulation with TOBC 1 mg/mL; TOBC + β-HCH: cells pretreated 3 h with TOBC 1 mg/mL and then for 6 h with 10 µM β-HCH. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.001) are marked with asterisks and are referred to control.
Figure 7Flow cytometric analysis on LNCaP cells. (A) Analyses of cycle distribution evidence that β-HCH induces an increase in percentage of propidium-iodide-stained cells in G2M phase, whereas TOBC counteracts β-HCH proliferative activity, bringing this value back to control level. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results and obtained values are reported as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test. Statistically significant differences were measured between same cell cycle phase (G0G1, S-Phase, G2/M) for each sample and are all referred to control (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001); (B) Annexin V-FITC assay. While β-HCH alone does not affect apoptotic population, TOBC is able to induce apoptosis in LNCaP cells either untreated or treated with β-HCH. Experiments were repeated three times and analyzed using ModFit LT software with similar results. Values reported in histogram are presented as mean and standard deviation. CTRL: control (untreated cells); β-HCH: cells subjected to 24 h stimulation with 10 µM β-HCH; TOBC: cells subjected to a 3 h stimulation with TOBC 1 mg/mL; TOBC + β-HCH: cells pretreated 3 h with TOBC 1 mg/mL and n for 24 h with 10 µM β-HCH. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences (* p< 0.05; ** p< 0.005; *** p < 0.001) are marked with asterisks and are referred to control.
Figure 8Impact of TOBC on β-HCH-dependent colony formation. Cells were pretreated for one week with 10 μM β-HCH and n for 5 days with 1 mg/mL TOBC. As shown in figure, TOBC contrasts β-HCH-dependent colony formation leading to a decrease in colony number. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results, and obtained values are presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prisma software using Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences (** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001) are marked with asterisks and are referred to control.
Figure 9Graphic summary: bioactive principles contained in TOBC solution modulate β-HCH cellular target by means of different mechanisms of action.