| Literature DB >> 34885642 |
Yuhang Dong1, Dexian Yin1, Linhui Deng1, Renwei Cao1, Shikai Hu1,2, Xiuying Zhao1,2, Li Liu1,2.
Abstract
Sound absorbing materials combining millable polyurethane elastomer (MPU) and eucommia ulmoides rubber (EUG) were successfully fabricated via a physical blending process of EUG and MPU. The microstructure, crystallization performances, damping, mechanical and sound absorption properties of the prepared MPU/EUG composites were investigated systematically. The microstructure surface of various MPU/EUG composites became rough and cracked by the gradual incorporation of EUG, resulting in a deteriorated compatibility between EUG and MPU. With the increase of EUG content, the storage modulus (E') of various MPU/EUG composites increased in a temperature range of -50 °C to 40 °C and their loss factor (tanδ) decreased significantly, including a reduction of the tanδ of MPU/EUG (70/30) composites from 0.79 to 0.64. Specifically, the addition of EUG sharply improved the sound absorption performances of various MPU/EUG composites in a frequency range of 4.5 kHz-8 kHz. Compared with that of pure MPU, the sound absorption coefficient of the MPU/EUG (70/30) composite increased 52.2% at a pressure of 0.1 MPa and 16.8% at a pressure of 4 MPa, indicating its outstanding sound absorption properties.Entities:
Keywords: damping; eucommia ulmoides rubber; millable polyurethane elastomer; sound absorption
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885642 PMCID: PMC8658837 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Experimental formula of various MPU/EUG composites.
| Component | Content | Component | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPU | 100 | EUG | 100 |
| Stearic acid | 0.5 | ZnO | 5 |
| Active agent NH-2 | 2 | Stearic acid | 2 |
| Accelerator D | 2 | Accelerator DZ | 1 |
| Accelerator DM | 2 | Sulfur | 2 |
| Sulfur | 2 |
Figure 1(a) the preparation process of various MPU/EUG composites by using an open mill; (b) the vulcanizing instrument used in this work.
Figure 2(a) the prepared MPU/EUG specimens for SEM observation; (b) mechanical property testing instrument used in this work.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscope images of various MPU/EUG composites: (a) pure MPU; (b) MPU/EUG = 90/10; (c) MPU/EUG = 80/20; (d) MPU/EUG = 70/30; (e) MPU/EUG = 60/40; (f) MPU/EUG = 50/50.
Figure 4DSC and XRD curves of various MPU/EUG composites. (a) DSC curves; (b) XRD curves.
Crystallinity of various MPU/EUG composites.
| MPU/EUG | 100/0 | 90/10 | 80/20 | 70/30 | 60/40 | 50/50 | 0/100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔH (j.g−1) | 0 | 0 | 6.35 | 17.33 | 25.08 | 25.22 | 29.76 |
| 0 | 0 | 3.4 | 9.3 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 15.9 |
Figure 5The tanδ-T and E’-T curves of various MPU/EUG composites. (a) tanδ-T curves; (b) E’-T curves.
Figure 6The sound absorption coefficient of various MPU/EUG composites under different pressures: (a) 0.1 MPa; (b) 1.5 MPa; (c) 2 MPa; (d) 4 MPa.
Figure 7The average sound absorption coefficient of various MPU/EUG composites in the frequency domain of 4.5–8 kHz.
Mechanical properties of various MPU/EUG composites.
| MPU/EUG | Tensile Strength | Elongation at Break | 100% Elongation Stress (MPa) | 300% Elongation Stress (MPa) | Hardness (Shao A) | Tensile Permanent Deformation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100/0 | 30.2 | 597 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 56 | 12 |
| 90/10 | 28.5 | 585 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 55 | 17 |
| 80/20 | 25.5 | 609 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 54 | 26 |
| 70/30 | 25.2 | 701 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 59 | 34 |
| 60/40 | 20.9 | 726 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 65 | 67 |
| 50/50 | 16.9 | 679 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 69 | 130 |
| 0/100 | 17.8 | 514 | 5.5 | 9.3 | 90 | -- |
Figure 8Stress–strain curves of various MPU/EUG composites.