| Literature DB >> 34885610 |
Shakeel Ahmed1, Abasal Hussain1, Zahoor Hussain2, Zhang Pu2, Krzysztof Adam Ostrowski3, Rafał Walczak3.
Abstract
The effect of combining filler (carbon black) and fibrous materials (steel fiber and polypropylene fiber) with various sizes of coarse particles on the post-cracking behavior of conductive concrete was investigated in this study. Steel fibers (SF) and carbon black (CB) were added as monophasic, diphasic, and triphasic materials in the concrete to enhance the conductive properties of reinforced concrete. Polypropylene fiber (PP) was also added to steel fiber and carbon to improve the post-cracking behavior of concrete beams. This research mainly focused on the effects of macro fibers on toughness parameters and energy absorption capacity, as well as enhancing the self-sensing of multiple cracks and post-cracking behavior. Fractional changes in resistance and crack opening displacement (COD-FCR) and the relationship of load-deflection-FCR with different coarse aggregates of (5-10 mm and 15-20 mm) sizes were investigated, and the law of resistance signal changes with single and multiple cracking through load-time-FCR curves was explored. Results indicated that the smaller size coarse aggregates (5-10 mm) showed higher compressive strength: up to 8.3% and 14.83% with diphasic (SF + CB), respectively. The flexural strength of PC-10 increased 22.60 and 51.2%, respectively, with and without fibers, compared to PC-20. The diphasic and triphasic conductive material with the smaller size of aggregates (5-10 mm) increased the FCR values up to 38.95% and 42.21%, respectively, as compared to those of greater size coarse aggregates (15-20 mm). The hybrid uses of fibrous and filler materials improved post-cracking behavior as well as the self-sensing ability of reinforced concrete.Entities:
Keywords: FCR-COD curves; carbon black; coarse aggregate; concrete beam; conductive concrete; crack monitoring; polypropylene fiber; steel fiber
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885610 PMCID: PMC8659041 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Dimension and shape of (a) steel fibers (b) nanocarbon black (c) polypropylene fibers.
Physical properties of fiber and filler materials.
| Materials | Length | Diameter/Particle Size | Density | Resistivity | Tensile Strength | Young’s Modulus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 35 | 0.55 | 7.85 | 5–10 | 1150 | 210 |
| PP | 35 | 0.35 | 0.9 | - | 547–658 | 3.5–7.5 |
| CB | - | 6 × 10−5 | 0.5 | 0.75 | - | - |
Mix proportions of concrete with conductive and nonconductive material.
| Type | Specimens | Binder | Aggregates | Polypropylene Fiber (PP) | Steel Fiber (SF) | Carbon Black (CB) | Slump |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain Concrete | PC-10 | 545 | 1670 | - | - | - | 180 |
| PC-20 | 545 | 1670 | - | - | - | 195 | |
| Monophasic admixtures | SF70-10 | 545 | 1670 | - | 70 | - | 153 |
| SF70-20 | 545 | 1670 | - | 70 | - | 164 | |
| Diphasic Admixtures | SF70-CB4-10 | 545 | 1670 | - | 70 | 4 | 69 |
| SF70-CB4-20 | 545 | 1670 | - | 70 | 4 | 81 | |
| SF70-PP2-10 | 545 | 1670 | 2 | 70 | - | 150 | |
| SF70-PP2-20 | 545 | 1670 | 2 | 70 | - | 162 | |
| Triphasic Admixtures | SF70-PP2-CB4-10 | 545 | 1670 | 2 | 70 | 4 | 63 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-20 | 545 | 1670 | 2 | 70 | 4 | 71 |
Notations: PC-10 and PC-20 stands for plain concrete with 5–10 mm and 15–20 mm size coarse aggregates. SF, PP and CB stand for steel fiber, polypropylene fiber and carbon black. The number followed by the letter refers to the conductive material size, kg/m3, for example, SF70-PP2-CB4-10 and SF70-PP2-CB4-20 mean the samples with steel fibers 70 kg/m3, polypropylene fiber 2 kg/m3, carbon black 4 kg/m3 and coarse aggregates with (5–10 mm) and (15–20 mm) size aggregates.
Figure 2Schematic diagram for bending loading experimental set-up.
Compression strength, flexural strength and toughness parameters.
| Specimens | Standred Deviation | Fu | σu |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-10 | 40.27 | 3.83 | 13.50 | 4.05 | - | - | - | - |
| PC-20 | 37.76 | 4.95 | 12.94 | 3.88 | - | - | - | - |
| SF70-10 | 43.01 | 1.57 | 15.88 | 4.76 | 8.44 | 7.60 | 46.232 | 8.33 |
| SF70-20 | 40.31 | 2.37 | 15.10 | 4.53 | 9.53 | 8.59 | 44.19 | 7.96 |
| SF70-CB4-10 | 46.04 | 1.91 | 17.18 | 5.15 | 10.83 | 9.70 | 54.11 | 10.10 |
| SF70-CB4-20 | 42.21 | 3.73 | 14.59 | 4.37 | 8.60 | 7.74 | 45.42 | 8.18 |
| SF70-PP2-10 | 38.65 | 3.72 | 16.60 | 5.04 | 11.49 | 10.34 | 58.87 | 11.21 |
| SF70-PP2-20 | 35.55 | 3.07 | 15.88 | 4.76 | 8.28 | 7.50 | 43.01 | 7.74 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-10 | 41.47 | 6.51 | 20.97 | 6.04 | 12.10 | 10.90 | 66.17 | 11.97 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-20 | 38.33 | 7.83 | 16.62 | 4.96 | 11.17 | 10.23 | 53.45 | 9.62 |
Notations, f: compressive strength of concrete (N/mm2), Fu: the values of maximum load (kN) at the interval of 0.05 mm, σu: flexural strength of concrete (N/mm2), f.2: equivalent flexural tensile strength (Mpa) by δ2, f.3: equivalent flexural tensile strength (Mpa) by δ3, D: The energy absorption capacity of plain concrete, D.2 = D2 − D (kN·mm) by δ2 = δ1 + 0.65 (mm), D.3 = D3 − D (kN·mm) by δ3 = δ1 + 2.65 (mm), δ: deflection corresponds to Fu (mm) described in Figure 3.
Figure 3Flexural load-deflection curves of 5–10 mm coarse aggregates and 15–20 mm coarse aggregates.
Figure 4Load-deflection-FCR curves of 5–10 mm coarse aggregates (a) SF70-10 (b) SF70-CB4-10 (c) SF70-PP2-10 (d) SF70-PP2-CB4-10.
Figure 5Load-deflection-FCR curves of 15–20 mm coarse aggregates (a) SF70-20 (b) SF70-CB4-20 (c) SF70-PP2-20 (d) SF70-PP2-CB4-20.
Loading drop rate and percentage increment of FCR.
| Samples | Load Drop Rate (%) | Load Drop (kN) | FCR1.5 (%) | FCR3 (%) | Percentage Increment from FCR1.5 to FCR3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF70-10 | 17.48 | 1.50 | 25.25 | 31.9 | 20.84 |
| SF70-20 | 20.01 | 2.75 | 21.15 | 28.12 | 24.50 |
| SF70-CB4-10 | 8.33 | 1.05 | 28.95 | 37.72 | 23.25 |
| SF70-CB4-20 | 10.39 | 1.36 | 28.25 | 34.5 | 18.57 |
| SF70-PP2-10 | 5.32 | 0.97 | 23.56 | 27.65 | 14.79 |
| SF70-PP2-20 | 11.87 | 1.80 | 20.20 | 24.15 | 16.35 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-10 | 2.70 | 0.60 | 35.12 | 44.95 | 21.86 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-10 | 12.71% | 1.35 | 15.18 | 17.10 | 11.22 |
Figure 6Relationship between FCR and COD of (a) SF70-10 (b) SF70-CB4-10 (c) SF70-PP2-10 (d) SF70-PP2-CB4-10.
Figure 7Relationship between FCR and COD of (a) SF70-20 (b) SF70-CB4-20 (c) SF70-PP2-20 (d) SF70-PP2-CB4-20.
Fitted parameters through exp decay fit equation.
| Specimens |
|
|
| C2R | FCR3 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF70-10 | 2.23 | −35.66 | 35.80 | 0.95938 | 27.75 |
| SF70-20 | 1.60 | −31.54 | 31.40 | 0.99735 | 26.12 |
| SF70-CB4-10 | 1.26 | −41.35 | 41.10 | 0.99834 | 38.95 |
| SF70-CB4-20 | 0.79 | −37.81 | 38.08 | 0.99422 | 35 |
| SF70-PP2-10 | 1.53 | −28.71 | 28.05 | 0.99506 | 23.65 |
| SF70-PP2-20 | 1.41 | −25.86 | 25.92 | 0.99422 | 22.50 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-10 | 0.76 | −42.96 | 42.45 | 0.99813 | 42.50 |
| SF70-PP2-CB4-20 | 1.73 | −19.29 | 19.41 | 0.99179 | 16.50 |
Figure 8Load-time-FCR curves of (a) SF70-PP2-20 (b) SF70-PP2-CB4-10.
Figure 9Single and multiple crack patterns of (a) SF70-PP2-20 (b) SF70-PP2-CB4-10.