| Literature DB >> 34885576 |
Muhammad Irfan1, Rab Nawaz2,3, Javed Akbar Khan4, Habib Ullah2, Tahir Haneef5, Stanislaw Legutko6, Saifur Rahman1, Jerzy Józwik7, Mabkhoot A Alsaiari8, Mohammad Kamal Asif Khan9, Salim Nasar Faraj Mursal1, Fahad Salem AlKahtani1, Omar Alshorman1, Abdulnour Ali Jazem Ghanim10.
Abstract
The release of phenolic-contaminated treated palm oil mill effluent (TPOME) poses a severe threat to human and environmental health. In this work, manganese-modified black TiO2 (Mn-B-TiO2) was produced for the photodegradation of high concentrations of total phenolic compounds from TPOME. A modified glycerol-assisted technique was used to synthesize visible-light-sensitive black TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), which were then calcined at 300 °C for 60 min for conversion to anatase crystalline phase. The black TiO2 was further modified with manganese by utilizing a wet impregnation technique. Visible light absorption, charge carrier separation, and electron-hole pair recombination suppression were all improved when the band structure of TiO2 was tuned by producing Ti3+ defect states. As a result of the enhanced optical and electrical characteristics of black TiO2 NPs, phenolic compounds were removed from TPOME at a rate of 48.17%, which is 2.6 times higher than P25 (18%). When Mn was added to black TiO2 NPs, the Ti ion in the TiO2 lattice was replaced by Mn, causing a large redshift of the optical absorption edges and enhanced photodegradation of phenolic compounds from TPOME. The photodegradation efficiency of phenolic compounds by Mn-B-TiO2 improved to 60.12% from 48.17% at 0.3 wt% Mn doping concentration. The removal efficiency of phenolic compounds from TPOME diminished when Mn doping exceeded the optimum threshold (0.3 wt%). According to the findings, Mn-modified black TiO2 NPs are the most effective, as they combine the advantages of both black TiO2 and Mn doping.Entities:
Keywords: bandgap; black TiO2 nanoparticles; manganese doping; phenolic compounds; photodegradation; visible light absorption; wastewater treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885576 PMCID: PMC8658776 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Scheme for the synthesis of black TiO2 and Mn-modified black TiO2 NPs.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns, (b) DRUV-Vis spectra, and (c) Tauc’s plot of the bandgap energies of black and Mn-modified black TiO2 NPs.
Summary of the photocatalytic properties of the B-TiO2 and Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
| Properties | B-TiO2 | Mn-B-TiO2 (0.1%) | Mn-B-TiO2 (0.3%) | Mn-B-TiO2 (0.5%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWHM | 0.5872 | 0.5628 | 0.5117 | 0.4093 |
| d-spacing (Å) | 3.498 | 3.507 | 3.504 | 3.550 |
| Crystallite size (nm) | 49.31 | 47.63 | 47.89 | 48.41 |
| Crystallinity (%) | 60.82 | 46.00 | 47.49 | 45.79 |
| Absorption edge (nm) | 550 | >600 | >600 | >600 |
| Bandgap | 2.96 | 2.49 | 2.30 | 2.21 |
| Specific surface area (m2/g) | 99.88 | 97.35 | 94.03 | 74.60 |
| Pore volume (m3/g) | 0.198 | 0.216 | 0.210 | 0.231 |
| Pore size (nm) | 3.06 | 5.01 | 5.03 | 5.08 |
Figure 3HRTEM images of (a) B-TiO2 and (c) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs and line profiles of (b) B-TiO2 and (d) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
Figure 4FESEM images of (a) B-TiO2 and (b) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of (c) B-TiO2 and (d) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
Figure 5Comparison of (a) XPS survey spectra, (b) Ti2p spectra, (c) C1s spectra, and (d) O1s spectra; and deconvoluted Ti2p spectra of (e) B-TiO2 (f) Mn-B-TiO2; deconvoluted O1s spectra of (g) B-TiO2 (h) Mn-B-TiO2; deconvoluted C1s spectra of (i) B-TiO2 (j) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
XPS fitting parameters for B-TiO2 and Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
| Fitting Parameters | Binding Energy (eV) | |
|---|---|---|
| B-TiO2 | Mn-B-TiO2 NPs | |
| Ti2p3/2 (Ti4+) | 459.04 | 460.04 |
| Ti2p1/2 (Ti3+) | 460.46 | 458.70 |
| Ti2p3/2 (Ti4+) | 465.05 | 465.58 |
| Ti2p1/2 (Ti3+) | — | — |
| 1 OL | 529.94 | 530.31 |
| 2 OV | 531.37 | 531.56 |
| C–C | 284.71 | 285.08 |
| C–O | — | 285.88 |
| Coke-C | 288.78 | 289.24 |
| Mn3+ | — | 642.65 |
| Mn4+ | — | 643.98 |
| Mn6+ | — | 645.41 |
| Mn7+ | — | 646.28 |
1 lattice oxygen, 2 oxygen vacancy.
Figure 6(a) Mn2p XPS spectra of Mn-B-TiO2 NPs, (b) PL spectra, and (c) deconvoluted PL spectra of B-TiO2 and (d) Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.
Figure 7(a) UV-Vis absorbance spectra of TPOME after treatment (b) photocatalytic performance of B-TiO2 and Mn-B-TiO2 NPs for phenols’ removal and (c) kinetic plots of photocatalytic phenols’ removal.
Figure 8The photocatalytic degradation mechanism of phenols over Mn-B-TiO2 under visible light irradiation [64,65].
Apparent rate constants, and electrical energy consumption by different photocatalysts.
| Photocatalyst | Phenol Removal (%) | Kapp (min−1) | Electrical Energy (kWh/m3) | Cost USD/m3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-TiO2 | 48.17 | 0.2865 | 104.71 | 5.54963 |
| Mn-B-TiO2 (0.1%) | 52.37 | 0.3221 | 93.14 | 4.93642 |
| Mn-B-TiO2 (0.3%) | 60.12 | 0.3992 | 75.15 | 3.98295 |
| Mn-B-TiO2 (0.5%) | 23.97 | 0.1190 | 252.11 | 13.36183 |
Figure 9(a) Recyclability tests results of B-TiO2 and Mn-B-TiO2 NPs, (b) XRD patterns, (c) Raman spectra of Mn-B-TiO2 NPs.