| Literature DB >> 34885562 |
Mehmet Kaya1, Zeynel Baran Yıldırım2, Fuat Köksal1, Ahmet Beycioğlu3, Izabela Kasprzyk4.
Abstract
In this research, the mechanical properties of lightweight mortars containing different percentages of additional powder materials has been investigated using response surface methodology (RSM). Box-Behnken design, one of the RSM techniques, was used to study the effects of silica fume content (5, 10, and 15%), vermiculite/cement (V/C) ratio (4, 6, and 8), and temperature (300, 600, and 900 °C) on the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), bending strength, and compressive strength of lightweight mortars. Design expert statistical software was accustomed to determining and evaluating the mix-design of materials in mortar mixtures and temperature effect on mortars. After preliminary experimental research of the relationships between independent and response variables, regression models were built. During the selection of the model parameters, F value, p-value, and R2 values of the statistical models were taken into account by using the backward elimination technique. The results showed a high correlation between the variables and responses. Multi-objective optimization results showed that the critical temperatures for different levels of silica fume (5-10-15%) were obtained as 371.6 °C, 306.3 °C, and 436 °C, respectively, when the V/C ratio kept constant as 4. According to the results obtained at high desirability levels, it is found that the UPS values varied in the range of 2480-2737 m/s, flexural strength of 3.13-3.81 MPa, and compressive strength of 9.9-11.5 MPa at these critical temperatures. As a result of this research, RSM is highly recommended to evaluate mechanical properties where concrete includes some additional powder materials and was exposed to high temperature.Entities:
Keywords: box-Behnken design; expanded vermiculite; lightweight mortar; response surface methodology; silica fume
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885562 PMCID: PMC8658890 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties and characteristics of CEM I 42.5 Portland cement, expanded vermiculite, and silica fume.
|
| |
| MgO | 2.75 |
| Si2O2 | 19.12 |
| AI2O3 | 5.63 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.39 |
| Na2O | - |
| CaO | 63.17 |
| SO3 | 2.74 |
| K2O | 1 |
| Insoluble materials | 2.33 |
| Loss on ignition | 0.49 |
|
| |
| Specific gravity (g/cm3) | 3.09 |
| Blaine specific surface area (cm2/g) | 3114 |
| Initial setting time (min) | 150 |
| Final setting time (min) | 215 |
|
| |
| Color | Gold |
| Combustibility | Non-combustible |
| Shape | According to shape granule |
| Cation exchange capacity | 50–150 meg/100 g |
| Permeability | 95% |
| Water holding capacity | 240% (by weight) |
| 28% (by volume) | |
| pH | 8.1 |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.066–0.063 W/m K |
| Bulk density | 140 kg/m3 |
| Specific gravity | 0.22 |
| Specific heat | 0.20–0.26 kcal/kg °C |
| Sintering temperature | 1150–1250 °C |
| SiO2 | 36.90% |
| AI2O3 | 17.70% |
| CaO | 3.50% |
| TiO2 | 2.20% |
| MgO | 16.40% |
| K2O | 2.60% |
| Na2O | 0.20% |
| Fe2O3 | 11.20% |
| Loss on ignition | 9.20% |
|
| |
| MgO | 1.47 |
| AI2O3 | 1.42 |
| CaO | 0.8 |
| SO3 | 1.34 |
| SiO2 + AI2O3 + Fe2O3 | 89.16 |
| SiO2 | 85.35 |
| Fe2O3 | 2.39 |
| Loss on ignition | 3.4 |
| Moisture (%) | 0.19 |
| Bulk density | 0.55–0.65 kg/dm3 |
| Retaining on 45-micron sieve (%) | 0.58 |
| Specific gravity | 2.23 |
| Surface area (cm2/g) | 8900 |
Figure 1SEM images of expanded vermiculite and the form before use in the mixture.
Figure 2Research process.
Independent variables and their levels.
| Levels of Code | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | Factor | −1 | 0 | +1 |
| A | Silica Fume, % | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| B | V/C | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| C | Temperature, °C | 300 | 600 | 900 |
Box–Behnken Design for three variables.
| Experiment/Mix No. | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | −1 |
| 7 | 1 | −1 | 0 |
| 8 | −1 | 0 | −1 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | 1 |
| 10 | −1 | −1 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | −1 |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | 0 | −1 | −1 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Design matrix and responses obtained.
| Run No | Silica Fume (%) | V/C | Temperature °C | UPV (m/s) | Bending Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5 | 8 | 600 | 2181 | 1.8 | 5.3 |
|
| 15 | 8 | 600 | 2173 | 2.1 | 6.1 |
|
| 10 | 8 | 900 | 2227 | 0.9 | 3.5 |
|
| 5 | 6 | 900 | 2537 | 1.2 | 4.4 |
|
| 10 | 6 | 600 | 2380 | 2.5 | 7.9 |
|
| 10 | 8 | 300 | 2267 | 2.2 | 6.2 |
|
| 15 | 4 | 600 | 2737 | 3.0 | 10.9 |
|
| 5 | 6 | 300 | 2305 | 2.4 | 7.1 |
|
| 10 | 4 | 900 | 2595 | 1.2 | 8.1 |
|
| 5 | 4 | 600 | 2564 | 2.9 | 9.3 |
|
| 10 | 6 | 600 | 2385 | 2.6 | 7.8 |
|
| 15 | 6 | 300 | 2546 | 2.9 | 9.9 |
|
| 15 | 6 | 900 | 2328 | 1.0 | 5.1 |
|
| 10 | 4 | 300 | 2594 | 3.8 | 11.8 |
|
| 10 | 6 | 600 | 2408 | 2.7 | 8.0 |
ANOVA for developed response models.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | Prob > F ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Model | 413,984.6 | 11 | 37,635.0 | 141.64 |
|
| A-Silica Fume | 256.0 | 1 | 256.0 | 0.96 | 0.3987 |
| B-V/C | 120,756.3 | 1 | 120,756.3 | 454.47 | 0.0002 |
| C-Temperature | 78.1 | 1 | 78.1 | 0.29 | 0.6253 |
| AB | 8190.2 | 1 | 8190.2 | 30.82 | 0.0115 |
| AC | 50,625.0 | 1 | 50,625.0 | 190.53 | 0.0008 |
| BC | 420.3 | 1 | 420.3 | 1.58 | 0.2975 |
| A2 | 887.1 | 1 | 887.1 | 3.34 | 0.1651 |
| B2 | 194.1 | 1 | 194.1 | 0.73 | 0.4556 |
| C2 | 1869.2 | 1 | 1869.2 | 7.03 | 0.0768 |
| A2B | 7938.0 | 1 | 7938.0 | 29.87 | 0.0120 |
| AB2 | 2211.1 | 1 | 2211.1 | 8.32 | 0.0633 |
| Residual | 797.1250 | 3 | 265.7 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 351.1250 | 1 | 351.1 | 1.57 |
|
|
| |||||
| Model | 9.9948 | 10 | 0.9995 | 177.69 |
|
| A-Silica Fume | 0.0612 | 1 | 0.0612 | 10.89 | 0.0299 |
| B-V/C | 1.9013 | 1 | 1.9013 | 338.00 | 0.0001 |
| C-Temperature | 3.8025 | 1 | 3.8025 | 676.00 | 0.0000 |
| AB | 0.0100 | 1 | 0.0100 | 1.78 | 0.2533 |
| AC | 0.1225 | 1 | 0.1225 | 21.78 | 0.0095 |
| BC | 0.4225 | 1 | 0.4225 | 75.11 | 0.0010 |
| A2 | 0.0831 | 1 | 0.0831 | 14.77 | 0.0184 |
| B2 | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.00 | 1.0000 |
| C2 | 1.2208 | 1 | 1.2208 | 217.03 | 0.0001 |
| A2C | 0.0800 | 1 | 0.0800 | 14.22 | 0.0196 |
| Residual | 0.0225 | 4 | 0.0056 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.0025 | 2 | 0.0013 | 0.13 |
|
|
| |||||
| Model | 79.2818 | 9 | 8.8091 | 77.61 |
|
| A-Silica Fume | 4.3513 | 1 | 4.3513 | 38.34 | 0.0016 |
| B-V/C | 45.1250 | 1 | 45.1250 | 397.58 | 0.0000 |
| C-Temperature | 24.1513 | 1 | 24.1513 | 212.79 | 0.0000 |
| AB | 0.1600 | 1 | 0.1600 | 1.41 | 0.2884 |
| AC | 1.1025 | 1 | 1.1025 | 9.71 | 0.0264 |
| BC | 0.2500 | 1 | 0.2500 | 2.20 | 0.1979 |
| A2 | 0.5544 | 1 | 0.5544 | 4.88 | 0.0781 |
| B2 | 0.5544 | 1 | 0.5544 | 4.88 | 0.0781 |
| C2 | 2.9083 | 1 | 2.9083 | 25.62 | 0.0039 |
| Residual | 0.5675 | 5 | 0.1135 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.5475 | 3 | 0.1825 | 18.25 |
|
where A: Silica fume, B: Vermiculite/Cement ratio, C: Temperature, A2, B2 and C2: second order effect, A*B, A*C and B*C two factor interaction effects, A2B, AB2 and A2C qubic effects df: Degree of freedom, F-values: Fisher-statistical test value, p-values: Probability values.
Coefficient of determinations for response variables.
| Response | R2 | Adj R2 | Pred R2 | A.P. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (m/s) | 0.9938 | 0.9891 | 0.9094 | 46.020 |
| Bending strength (Mpa) | 0.9968 | 0.9924 | 0.9893 | 51.304 |
| Compressive strength (Mpa) | 0.9878 | 0.9755 | 0.9287 | 30.139 |
where R2: degree of correlation, Adj R2: adjusted the degree of correlation, Pred R2: predicted degree of correlation, A.P: adequate precision.
Figure 3Relationship between experimental and predicted values of response variable.
Figure 4Influence of independent variables and their interactions on response variables.
Multi-objective optimization criteria.
| Variables and Responses | Symbol | Goal | Lower Limit | Upper Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica Fume (%) | A | (%5–10–15) | 5 | 15 |
| V/C | B | (4–6–8) | 4 | 8 |
| Temperature °C | C | In range | 300 | 900 |
| Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (m/s) |
| In range | 2173 | 2737 |
| Bending Strength (MPa) |
| Maximize | 0.9 | 3.8 |
| Compressive Strength (MPa) |
| Maximize | 3.5 | 11.8 |
Optimization with desirability values.
| Solution Number | Silica Fume (%) | V/C | Temperature °C | UPV (m/s) | Bending Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Desirability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 371.6 | 2480.7 | 3.22 | 9.9 | 78.9 |
| 2 | 10.00 | 4.00 | 306.3 | 2597.8 | 3.81 | 11.5 | 98.3 |
| 3 | 15.00 | 4.00 | 436.605 | 2737 | 3.13 | 11.2 | 84.4 |
| 4 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 423.9 | 2345.2 | 2.52 | 7.2 | 49.7 |
| 5 | 10.00 | 6.00 | 330.2 | 2420.8 | 3.01 | 8.7 | 67.8 |
| 6 | 15.00 | 6.00 | 306.8 | 2533.9 | 2.91 | 9.6 | 71.6 |
| 7 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 604.7 | 2173 | 1.87 | 4.7 | 22.6 |
| 8 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 380.89 | 2241.4 | 2.28 | 6.7 | 42.9 |
| 9 | 15.00 | 8.00 | 364.1 | 2264.6 | 2.19 | 7.5 | 46.2 |