| Literature DB >> 34885529 |
Wonseok Jang1, Seunghun Han2, Taejun Gu1, Heeyeop Chae2,3, Dongmok Whang1,3.
Abstract
Due to the vulnerability of organic optoelectronic devices to moisture and oxygen, thin-film moisture barriers have played a critical role in improving the lifetime of the devices. Here, we propose a hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) embedded Al2O3 thin film as a flexible moisture barrier. After layer-by-layer (LBL) staking of polymer and hBN flake composite layer, Al2O3 was deposited on the nano-laminate template by spatial plasma atomic layer deposition (PEALD). Because the hBN flakes in Al2O3 thin film increase the diffusion path of moisture, the composite layer has a low water vapor transmission ratio (WVTR) value of 1.8 × 10-4 g/m2 day. Furthermore, as embedded hBN flakes restrict crack propagation, the composite film exhibits high mechanical stability in repeated 3 mm bending radius fatigue tests.Entities:
Keywords: exfoliation; flexible moisture barrier; hexagonal boron nitride; plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition; point defect
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885529 PMCID: PMC8658176 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1hBN templated Al2O3 deposition process. (A) Scheme illustrating initial state of Al2O3 deposition in hBN/PEI template layer, (B) A cross-sectional SEM image of Al2O3/hBN/PEI composite layer after 50 cycles ALD deposition in hBN/PEI template layer. The dashed line in (B) indicates the interface between the PEN substrate and the composite layer. (C) Scheme illustrating saturation state of Al2O3 deposition in hBN/PEI template layer after 200 cycles ALD deposition in hBN/PEI template layer, (D) Cross-sectional TEM images of Al2O3/hBN/PEI composite layer. The inset image is a high-resolution TEM image showing hBN flakes (dashed yellow box) in the composite layer. Scale bars are 100 nm.
Figure 2(A) Al 2p (B) O 1s XPS spectra of LBL Al2O3 (C) relative content of atomic bonding in LBL and bare substrate Al2O3.
Figure 3Electro-deposition of Cu particle on barrier bare Al2O3 (A) 5 nm (B) 10 nm (C) 20 nm and LBL Al2O3 (D) 5nm (E) 10 nm (F) 20 nm (Scale bar is 10 μm) (G) Comparison graph of Cu particle density between bare Al2O3 and LBL templated Al2O3 depends on thickness.
Figure 4(A) WVTR comparison plot of Al2O3 layers deposited on the bare PEN substrate and hBN/PEI/PEN substrate depending on the thickness (B) A plot of WVTR vs. thickness of the PEI/hBN barrier compared to previously reported values (C) WVTR values of LBL deposited Al2O3 layer before and after bending fatigue test (Bending radius: 3 mm (Tensile strain: 4%), 5000 cycles).