| Literature DB >> 34885493 |
Changzai Ren1, Wenlong Wang2, Dongliang Hua1, Shuang Wu2, Yonggang Yao2.
Abstract
The preparation of high-performance green cementitious material from industrial solid waste is a feasible large-scale utilization approach for industrial solid waste. This work investigates the feasibility of using industrial solid wastes in a sulphoaluminate-magnesium-potassium-phosphate cementitious composite material (SAC-MKPC) clinker preparation and the influence of the calcination temperature and clinker ingredients on the hydration behavior and mechanisms of the SAC-MKPC with a Mg/P ratio of 5. The results show that the novel SAC-MKPC that was prepared from aluminum slag, carbide slag, coal gangue, and magnesium desulfurization slag was composed mainly of mineral MgO, C4A3S¯, and C2S and the calcination temperature of the main mineral phases was 1250-1350 °C. The solid-waste-based SAC-MKPC had better mechanical properties and excellent water resistance compared with the MKPC. The optimal compressive strength reached 35.2, 70.9, 84.1, 87.7, and 101.6 MPa at 2 h, 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, and 28 d of hydration, respectively. The X-ray diffraction spectra and scanning electron micrographs of the hydration products of the SAC-MKPC clinker showed that AFt and K-struvite crystals coexisted and adhered to form a dense structure. This work provides an innovative idea to produce green cementitious material using industrial solid wastes and may promote the sustainable development of the power and mining industries.Entities:
Keywords: clinker phase; industrial solid waste; sulphoaluminate–magnesium–potassium–phosphate cementitious composite material; sustainable development; water resistance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885493 PMCID: PMC8658327 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Main pieces of experimental equipment.
| Process | Experimental Instruments | Manufacturer/Model | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Material Preparation Equipment | Electronic balance | Shanghai Yueping Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.; FA2004B | China |
| Disc refiner | Nanjing University Instrument Plant; QM-3SP04 | China | |
| Sample pulverizer | Shanghai Shuli Yiqi Yibiao Co., Ltd.; GJ100-1A | China | |
| Hot air oven | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; DHG-9053 | China | |
| Clinker Calcination | Standard sieve | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; 200 mesh | China |
| Box resistance furnace | Hennan Jianxi Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; KSL-1600X | China | |
| Steel mold | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; 20 mm × 20 mm × 20 mm | China | |
| Cement shaker | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; 60 times/min | China | |
| Standard curing box | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; YH40B | China | |
| Cement mortar vibration table | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; 170 mm × 110 mm × 300 mm | China | |
| Analysis Equipment | Automatic pressure measurement testing machine | Shandong Luda Experiment Instrument Co., Ltd.; DYH-300 B | China |
| Automatic setting time tester | Jian Yan Hua Ce (Hangzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd. | China | |
| SEM-EDS | Fei Electron Microscope Co., Ltd.; Quanta200; | Netherlands | |
| X-ray diffraction | Europe Italy Boris Pastemak Co., Ltd.; Europe | Germany | |
| X-ray fluorescence | USA Thermal Scientific Co., Ltd.; D8-Advance | America | |
| TG-DTG | NETZSCH STA 409 PC/PG Thermal Analyzer |
Chemical composition of the raw materials (wt%).
| MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | R2O a | LOI b | SAM c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbide Slag | 0.34 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 75.05 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 20.14 | KH2PO4 (99%, Aladdin) |
| Aluminum Slag | 4.87 | 70.79 | 9.65 | 0.41 | 1.95 | 4.11 | 0.49 | 3.51 | 4.22 | |
| Coal Gangue | 2.55 | 20.16 | 61.62 | 1.95 | 2.27 | 3.28 | 1.24 | 0.71 | 6.22 | |
| MDS | 31.46 | 1.21 | 1.03 | 58.15 | 1.26 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 6.23 |
a Alkaline oxide (K2O, Na2O). b Loss on ignition at 950 °C. c Secondary added materials.
Figure 1XRD patterns of raw materials: (a) magnesium desulfurization slag; (b) carbide slag; (c) aluminum slag; (d) coal gangue.
Figure 2TG−DTG outputs of raw materials: (a) magnesium desulfurization slag; (b) carbide slag.
Compositions of raw mixes in the experiment with different calcination temperatures.
| Sample | Coal Gangue/g | Aluminum Slag/g | MDS/g | Carbide Slag/g | Calcination | Holding Time/Min | Temperature Interval/°C | MgO Theoretical Content/wt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.22 | 14.33 | 63.74 | 20.71 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 40% |
| B | 0.75 | 8.63 | 76.73 | 13.89 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 50% |
| C | 0.43 | 5.09 | 84.86 | 9.62 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 60% |
| D | 0.23 | 2.71 | 90.43 | 6.63 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 70% |
| E | 0.15 | 1.67 | 93.07 | 5.11 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 80% |
| F | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 1200–1350 | 30 min | 50 | 100% |
Figure 3Calcination temperature increase control curve.
Mix proportions for the secondary mixing (g/100 g clinker).
| Sample | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | SO3 | MgO | K2O | SiO2 | Water | KDP | Gypsum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1200–40% | 12.19 | 1.18 | 31.23 | 24.07 | 25.06 | 0.19 | 5.69 | 29.4 | 17.03 | 3.73 |
| 1200–50% | 8.65 | 1.22 | 25.29 | 18.72 | 40.87 | 0.11 | 4.85 | 29.6 | 27.79 | 2.94 |
| 1200–60% | 5.32 | 1.36 | 20.08 | 14.22 | 54.36 | 0.06 | 4.35 | 29.7 | 36.96 | 2.26 |
| 1200–70% | 3.05 | 1.61 | 16.08 | 12.48 | 62.68 | 0.03 | 3.88 | 29.8 | 42.62 | 1.85 |
| 1200–80% | 2.05 | 1.64 | 13.58 | 10.05 | 68.03 | 0.06 | 4.42 | 29.9 | 46.23 | 1.59 |
| 1250–40% | 13.37 | 1.18 | 29.83 | 25.24 | 24.81 | 0.13 | 5.01 | 29.4 | 16.87 | 3.73 |
| 1250–50% | 11.98 | 1.38 | 24.95 | 15.77 | 40.42 | 0.14 | 4.96 | 29.6 | 27.48 | 2.95 |
| 1250–60% | 8.78 | 1.59 | 20.43 | 10.13 | 52.84 | 0.08 | 5.72 | 29.7 | 35.93 | 2.33 |
| 1250–70% | 3.81 | 1.63 | 15.25 | 7.76 | 66.45 | 0.04 | 4.85 | 29.8 | 45.18 | 1.66 |
| 1250–80% | 2.82 | 1.76 | 12.55 | 4.45 | 73.54 | 0.08 | 4.61 | 29.9 | 50.01 | 1.31 |
| 1300–40% | 25.18 | 1.26 | 32.13 | 8.89 | 24.66 | 0.21 | 6.93 | 29.4 | 16.77 | 3.73 |
| 1300–50% | 19.85 | 1.54 | 28.81 | 6.73 | 34.69 | 0.17 | 7.6 | 29.6 | 23.59 | 3.23 |
| 1300–60% | 14.24 | 2.39 | 22.96 | 4.73 | 46.33 | 0.23 | 8.46 | 29.7 | 27.78 | 2.65 |
| 1300–70% | 7.75 | 2.48 | 20.79 | 5.78 | 54.56 | 0.07 | 8.26 | 29.8 | 37.11 | 2.25 |
| 1300–80% | 4.48 | 2.55 | 16.52 | 1.81 | 66.14 | 0.05 | 8.24 | 29.9 | 44.98 | 1.68 |
| 1350–40% | 26.13 | 1.42 | 35.00 | 4.76 | 23.85 | 0.13 | 8.17 | 29.4 | 16.22 | 3.78 |
| 1350–50% | 19.24 | 1.63 | 30.49 | 3.26 | 36.01 | 0.08 | 8.81 | 29.6 | 24.48 | 3.17 |
| 1350–60% | 14.46 | 1.72 | 23.82 | 3.89 | 47.03 | 0.13 | 8.58 | 29.7 | 31.97 | 2.63 |
| 1350–70% | 7.17 | 2.18 | 19.19 | 3.84 | 58.57 | 0.07 | 8.68 | 29.8 | 41.19 | 2.05 |
| 1350–80% | 7.99 | 2.97 | 15.48 | 2.14 | 62.67 | 0.16 | 8.04 | 29.9 | 42.86 | 1.84 |
Figure 4XRD patterns of the SAC-MKPC clinker with MgO theoretical content at 1200 °C: (a) main phase; (b) minor phase; and (c) mineral phase actual content.
Figure 5XRD patterns of the SAC-MKPC clinker with MgO theoretical content at 1250 °C: (a) main phase; (b) minor phase; and (c) mineral phase actual content.
Figure 6XRD patterns of the SAC-MKPC clinker with MgO theoretical content at 1300 °C: (a) main phase; (b) minor phase; and (c) mineral phase actual content.
Figure 7XRD patterns of the SAC-MKPC clinker with MgO theoretical content at 1350 °C: (a) main phase; (b) minor phase; and (c) mineral phase actual content.
Figure 8XRD pattern of SAC-MKPC paste after 28 days of curing.
Figure 9TG-DTG outputs of the SAC-MKPC hydration product at 28 days: (a) 1200 °C; (b) 1250 °C; (c) 1300 °C; (d) 1350 °C.
TG results of the SAC-MKPC hydration product at 28 days.
| Sample | 1200–40% | 1200–50% | 1200–60% | 1200–70% | 1200–80% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPWL, °C | 98 | 102.5 | 106 | 107.5 | 108 |
| WL30–200 °C, wt.% | 5.51 | 9.48 | 13.16 | 14.04 | 14.31 |
| WL200–700 °C, wt.% | 2.24 | 1.45 | 1.08 | 0.87 | 0.68 |
| Sample | 1250–40% | 1250–50% | 1250–60% | 1250–70% | 1250–80% |
| TPWL,°C | 92.5 | 97.5 | 101.5 | 105 | 108 |
| WL30–200 °C, wt.% | 4.87 | 7.16 | 8.45 | 11.02 | 13.59 |
| WL200–700 °C, wt.% | 2.15 | 1.09 | 0.75 | 0.45 | 0.25 |
| Sample | 1300–40% | 1300–50% | 1300–60% | 1300–70% | 1300–80% |
| TPWL,°C | 103 | 105 | 106.5 | 107.5 | 108 |
| WL30–200 °C, wt.% | 6.19 | 9.49 | 11.41 | 13.55 | 14.99 |
| WL200–700 °C, wt.% | 1.54 | 1.24 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.46 |
| Sample | 1350–40% | 1350–50% | 1350–60% | 1350–70% | 1350–80% |
| TPWL, °C | 102 | 104 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
| WL30–200 °C, wt.% | 8.02 | 10.33 | 11.18 | 12.63 | 14.61 |
| WL200–700 °C, wt.% | 1.43 | 1.13 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.41 |
Note: TPWL, temperature peak of mass loss, °C; WL30–200 °C, 30–200 °C mass loss percentage; WL200–700 °C, 200–700 °C mass loss percentage.
Figure 10SEM micrographs of SAC-MKPC and EDS spectra (curing age: 28 days) (a. A area, b. B area, c. C area, d. D area).
Elemental distribution in selected areas.
| Element | A | B | C | D | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at% | m.r. | at% | m.r. | at% | m.r. | at% | m.r. | |
| C | 1.51 | 2.88 | - | - | - | - | 0.58 | 1.10 |
| O | 43.83 | 62.68 | 49.17 | 61.94 | 43.34 | 3.26 | 42.23 | 60.02 |
| Al | 3.28 | 2.78 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 18.88 | 15.91 |
| Si | - | - | 0.54 | 0.39 | - | - | 2.24 | 1.74 |
| S | 17.32 | 12.36 | 1.99 | 1.25 | - | - | 2.03 | 1.44 |
| Ca | 31.09 | 17.75 | 1.61 | 0.81 | 4.47 | 2.42 | 29.01 | 16.49 |
| Fe | 2.34 | 0.96 | 0.19 | 0.07 | - | - | 1.97 | 0.81 |
| Mg | 0.63 | 0.59 | 33.25 | 27.57 | 19.61 | 15.07 | - | - |
| P | - | - | 7.69 | 5.00 | 13.41 | 11.99 | 3.09 | 2.51 |
| K | - | - | 5.09 | 2.63 | 18.22 | 11.00 | - | - |
Figure 11SAC-MKPC sample setting time.
Figure 12Compressive strength of SAC-MKPC samples at (a) 1200 °C, (b) 1250 °C, (c) 1300 °C, and (d) 1350 °C.
Strength retention rate under different curing conditions.
| M/P | Theoretical MgO Content | Air Curing for 28 d (F/MPa) | Water Curing for 28 d ( | Strength Retention Rate (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3/1 | 100% | 53.9 | 32.9 | 0.61 |
| 80% | 67.5 | 43.8 | 0.65 | |
| 70% | 64.6 | 50.4 | 0.78 | |
| 60% | 48.3 | 46.9 | 0.97 | |
| 5/1 | 100% | 81.5 | 55.4 | 0.68 |
| 80% | 91.4 | 76.5 | 0.83 | |
| 70% | 89.5 | 92.2 | 1.03 | |
| 60% | 53.5 | 57.8 | 1.08 | |
| 7/1 | 100% | 83.5 | 60.1 | 0.72 |
| 80% | 92.6 | 86.1 | 0.93 | |
| 70% | 90.7 | 101.6 | 1.12 | |
| 60% | 55.2 | 64.6 | 1.17 | |
| 9/1 | 100% | 42.2 | 24.5 | 0.58 |
| 80% | 31.5 | 19.2 | 0.61 | |
| 70% | 25.2 | 24.7 | 0.98 | |
| 60% | 12.4 | 12.9 | 1.04 | |
| SAC | - | 68.7 | 76.95 | 1.12 |
Figure 13Water resistance of the SAC-MKPC.