| Literature DB >> 34885432 |
Ana Parra1, Ivana Jarak1, Ana Santos1, Francisco Veiga1,2, Ana Figueiras1,2.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is an area in great development and with application in the most varied fields of science, including cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. Because conventional formulations for topical application are not always able to effectively penetrate the physical barrier that human skin exerts against factors and compounds of the external environment, polymeric micelles appear as alternative carriers for drugs and active ingredients delivery, also allowing ingredients with lower solubility and higher lipophilicity to be delivered. In fact, the augmented bioavailability of drugs, greater efficacy even at a lower dose, and selective drug delivery in specific organelles are very interesting advantages of the polymeric micelles usage in cutaneous application. As a consequence, they show a reduction in many of the local and systemic adverse effects, which might lead to an increase in patient compliance to the therapeutics, constituting a promising alternative to conventional topical formulations.Entities:
Keywords: bioavailability; cosmetics; cutaneous application; efficacy; nanotechnology; polymeric micelles; safety; skin; skin disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885432 PMCID: PMC8658125 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic representation of the polymeric micelles formed by different polymers.
Figure 2Schematic representation of PM and drug-loading process in (a) one step and (b) two steps.
Figure 3Schematic representation of the solvent evaporation process for polymeric micelle’s preparation.
Figure 4Summarized schematization of the principal advantages and disadvantages for PM-based carrier systems.
Figure 5Schematic view of skin layers and drug-delivery routes.
Polymer micelles prepared for skin delivery described in the literature in the last decade.
| Active | Structure | Polymers Used as Micellar | Conclusions | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Oleanolic Acid |
| Poloxamer 407 | Enhanced wrinkle alleviation | [ |
| CoQ10 |
| Oleyl-hyaluronan | Enhancement in skin hydration | [ |
|
| ||||
| All- |
| Poly(ethylene glycol) conjugated phosphatidylethanolamine | Higher stability with slower drug oxidation | [ |
| All- | Diblock methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(hexyl-substituted lactic acid) | Higher efficiency than marketed formulations | [ | |
| Adapalene |
| D-α-tocopheryl polyethyleneglycol 1000 succinate | Targeted drug delivery capacity | [ |
| Benzoyl peroxide |
| Pluronic® F127 | Targeted drug delivery capacity | [ |
|
| ||||
| Tacrolimus |
| Diblock methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(hexyl-substituted lactic acid) | Enhancement in skin drug deposition | [ |
| Resveratrol |
| Pluronic® P123 | Decrease in the cytokine levels | [ |
| Silibinin |
| - | Reduction of psoriasis index area | [ |
|
| ||||
| Clotrimazole |
| Diblock Methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(hexyl-substituted lactic acid) | Enhancement in skin drug deposition | [ |
| Terconazole |
| Pluronic® P123 | Higher permeation | [ |
|
| ||||
| Imiquimod |
| Diblock methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-)-hexyl-substituted lactide | Higher delivery efficiency at lower dose than the marketed formulation | [ |
| Spironolactone |
| Diblock methoxy-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(hexyl-substituted lactic acid) | Targeted drug delivery capacity | [ |
Composition of micelles of oleanolic acid showing transparent liquid immediately after being diluted with distilled water [40].
| Composition ( | PMO-G | PMO-H |
|---|---|---|
| Oleanolic Acid | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Capryol® 90 | 2 | 2 |
| Poloxamer 407 | 6 | 7 |
Figure 6Remaining ATRA (%) in loaded PEG750-DPPE micelles (closed symbols) and 75% methanol/HBS solution (open symbols). Diamonds represent oxygen-filled environments, squares represent nitrogen-filled environments, and triangles represent ambient air (adapted from [20]). (a) light exposure ambient; (b) light protection ambient.
Figure 7Comparison of ADA delivery efficiency of formulations (12 h after application) in finite dose of the ADA formulations, corresponding to 2 and 10 µg/cm2 of ADA for the micelle and marketed formulations, respectively. Reprinted with permission from [42]). Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2018.
Figure 8Cutaneous distribution profile of TAC in the upper layers of human skin (total depth of 400 µm and a resolution of 20 µm) after a 12 h application of the 0.1% micelle formulation (close dots) and Protopic (0.1% w/w) (open dots). Reprinted with permission from [21]. Copyright American Chemical Society 2014.
Figure 9Serum cytokines concentration (TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23) of different groups. Reprinted with permission from [23]. Copyright Elsevier 2020.
Figure 10(a) Ex vivo cumulative amount of TCZ permeated per unit area across skin. (b) In vivo cumulative amount of TCZ deposited per unit area in the skin (adapted from [46]).