| Literature DB >> 34885420 |
Wanqi Zhang1, Hui Liu1, Zhechen Liu1, Yuhong An1, Yuan Zhong1, Zichu Hu2, Shujing Li1, Zhangjing Chen3, Sunguo Wang4, Xianliang Sheng2, Xiaotao Zhang2,5, Ximing Wang1,5.
Abstract
Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) was doped with a rare-earth metal, Eu, using a solvent synthesis method evenly on the surface of a mixed-crystal TiO2(Mc-TiO2) structure in order to produce a core-shell structure composite ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 adsorption photocatalyst with good adsorption and photocatalytic properties. The characterisation of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 was performed via X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis (BET) and ultraviolet-visible light differential reflectance spectroscopy (UV-DRs). The results indicated that Eu-doped ZIF-8 was formed evenly on the Mc-TiO2 surface, a core-shell structure formed and the light-response range was enhanced greatly. The ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 for basic fuchsin was investigated to validate its photocatalytic performance. The effect of the Eu doping amount, basic fuchsin concentration and photocatalyst dosage on the photocatalytic efficiency were investigated. The results revealed that, when 5%-Eu-doped ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 (20 mg) was combined with 30 mg/L basic fuchsin (100 mL) under UV irradiation for 1 h, the photocatalytic efficiency could reach 99%. Further, it exhibited a good recycling performance. Thus, it shows certain advantages in its degradation rate and repeatability compared with previously reported materials. All of these factors suggested that, in an aqueous medium, ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 is an eco-friendly, sustainable and efficient material for the photocatalytic degradation of basic fuchsin.Entities:
Keywords: Eu-doped; TiO2; ZIF-8; basic fuchsin; photocatalysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885420 PMCID: PMC8658464 DOI: 10.3390/ma14237265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) XRD patterns of TiO2 at different temperatures and (b) XRD patterns of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2, ZIF-8@Mc-TiO2, Mc-TiO2, ZIF-8.
Figure 2SEM (a) of ZIF-8, SEM (b–d) and TEM (e,f) of ZIF-8 (5%Eu)@Mc-TiO2.
Figure 3(a,b) ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 EDX diagram and (c) single element EDX mapping of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2.
Figure 4(a) XPS survey spectrum of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2. (b–f) N 1s, O 1s, Ti 2p, Zn 2p, Eu 3d, XPS spectrum of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2.
Figure 5N2 desorption diagram of ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2.
ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2-specific surface area and pore size values.
| Sample | SBET (m2/g) | VPore (cm3/g) | RAve (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | 159.23 | 0.0808 | 20,305 |
Figure 6UV-Vis DRS diagram (a,b) and band gap width diagram (c,d).
List of material forbidden band widths.
| Sample | Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(0.5%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(1%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(3%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(5%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(8%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 | ZIF-8(10%Eu)@Mc-TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eg(eV) | 2.97 | 2.94 | 2.92 | 2.94 | 2.92 | 2.90 | 2.85 | 2.83 |
Figure 7(a) ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2 and Mc-TiO2 photo catalytic efficiency diagram, (b) effect of initial concentration of basic fuchsin on catalytic efficiency, (c) effect of catalyst dosage on catalytic efficiency and (d) recycling times of catalyst.
ZIF-8(Eu)@Mc-TiO2-specific surface area and pore size values.
| Materials | Basic Fuchsin Concentration | Degradation Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Fe2O3/g-C3N4 [ | 25 mg/L | 92% |
| Ag/AgVO3 [ | 20 mg/L | 93.6% |
| H4SiW6Mo6O4O/SiO2 [ | 8 mg/L | 98% |
| Fe3O4/SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles [ | 10 mg/L | 98% |
| This work | 30 mg/L | 99% |